[FR_addict]

“... The Colonel was given a LAWFUL order by his chain-of-command and chose not to follow it for the most flimsy of reasons. He now realizes he was played by the “birther” crowd.

Regardless of Obama’s eligibility for service, he had no place to refuse a lawful order. He either obeys it or resigns his commission.”

It is not a lawful order if Obama is not eligible to be President, according to the Constitution.

It would be a simple thing for Obama to prove, yet Obama and “his crowd” refuse.

[OCCASparky]

It would be a simple thing for Obama to prove, yet Obama and “his crowd” refuse.

I too find it curious why he doesn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt, including his financial aid paperwork to college, transcripts, etc. But again, if you change the name Obama to Bush and birther to truther, is the Colonel any less wrong for doing what he did? His orders WERE lawful. Just because the President is the C-in-C of the Armed Forces doesn't mean every single deployment order comes straight from him. Delegation of authority and all that, dontcha know.