Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yogi Bear: The Worst Movie Ever?
Pundit Press ^ | 12/11/2010 | Aurelius

Posted on 12/13/2010 11:30:20 AM PST by therightliveswithus

The 'worst movie ever' is a term often thrown around when terrible movies are released. The upcoming 3D film Yogi Bear takes its inspiration form a classic cartoon and apparently wrecks it. The acting seems staid and the jokes in the commercials are embarrassing. It could possibly be the worst feature film in history.

My personal favorite, of course, is Tommy Wiseau's masterpiece The Room. Yet at least The Room has some redeeming features, mainly the fact that it is so bad, it is good. For example, please enjoy this quick summary of the movie:

(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: glitter; movies; terrible; yogibear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last
To: Borges; DollyCali

ping


161 posted on 12/14/2010 11:18:13 AM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

True Grit isn’t a remake it’s another crack at the novel.


162 posted on 12/14/2010 11:42:49 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Upstate NY Guy

“I vote for Eraserhead as the worst movie of all time.”

That’s just silly.


163 posted on 12/14/2010 11:48:16 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack; circlecity

A.I. may not have entirely worked but it was still ambitious and consumate filmmaking. And his best films have much better than simple dialogue.


164 posted on 12/14/2010 11:51:23 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"A.I. may not have entirely worked but it was still ambitious and consumate filmmaking. And his best films have much better than simple dialogue"

Oh his best films have been very good, such as Jaws as was noted above. But AI was a colossal stinker. An indecipherable script which rambled from scene to scene never coming close to a coherent plot. Incredibly boring and it went on forever. There were at least three points where it could have ended and I did think it was over, but no, it kept going and going. The production was terrible and in once scene towards the end you could actually see the boom microphone in the frame onscreen. The fact we know that Spielberg is capable of incredible film making is what made this mess all the more puzzling.

165 posted on 12/14/2010 12:01:04 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

When you see the boom mike onscreen that’s the fault of the projectionist who did not frame the film properly. Films are made to bleed off the screen. The novel structure of A.I. made it that much more interesting for me. Big budget film this artful don’t usually get made. You can respect it without liking it.


166 posted on 12/14/2010 12:05:08 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

I agree. I kept wishing that the blue fairy would bring the film to life.


167 posted on 12/14/2010 12:07:48 PM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"When you see the boom mike onscreen that’s the fault of the projectionist who did not frame the film properly."

But Spielberg had final say on editing and that scene (or any other scene for that matter) could have been snipped without affecting the "qualilty" of the movie one bit. All leaving that scene in did was to add poor prodcution to the extensive list of flaws connected with this embarrasment to the Speilberg cannon.

168 posted on 12/14/2010 12:25:36 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
The movie I use as the standard for horrible movies: The Perfect Storm

Utterly dreadful. It's enough that I was rooting for the main characters to just die already, but then periodically it would -- bizarrely -- switch to showing us Karen Allen and a couple of other people being rescued from some random boat that had nothing whatsoever to do with the main plot. I don't think "these unconnected events also took place on Earth at the same time" is a good enough reason to include scenes in a movie. You could get the same effect by taking a movie like 'The Fugitive' or 'The Sixth Sense' and inserting several scenes of a random person having their car break down & getting it towed.

169 posted on 12/14/2010 12:36:26 PM PST by Sloth (If a tax cut constitutes "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should count as a "desposit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Borges
“A.I. may not have entirely worked but it was still ambitious and consumate filmmaking. And his best films have much better than simple dialogue.”

AI failed miserably in the story telling department. Speilberg didn't seem to know what words were needed to project the ideas he wanted to beam into our minds via the dialog. AI as a film or story idea REQUIRED this more literary projection to work. He did not have our fears and preconceptions to manipulate as he had so deftly done in earlier films. Reducing complex ideas to dialog we can all understand is a talent in and of itself, no less than the talent Speilberg demonstrated in “Jaws”. Speilbergs great talent is very deceptive. The “simple” dialog, scenes, editing etc of his early films has convinced waaaay to many aggressive, intelligent but ultimately un talented people that THEY could be story tellers too. I think Speilberg, hands down, the most imitated Director in film history. Few people walked away from a Jimi Hendrix show saying “I can do that too!”. A LOT of people have walked away from a B.B. King show thinking “I can do that too”! They were of course wrong. Speilberg knew what he wanted to do in AI but he failed to pass that on to us.

170 posted on 12/14/2010 12:46:33 PM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull

Yogi Bear IS Howard the Duck II


171 posted on 12/14/2010 12:58:09 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Alternate ending. Booboo kills Yogi...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6w0r-ScEG4&feature=youtube_gdata_player


172 posted on 12/14/2010 1:15:22 PM PST by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

All films have the boom mike just off the frame. That’s the way they are made. They have to be framed properly so you can’t see it.


173 posted on 12/14/2010 1:27:22 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

But as cinema it was often breathtaking. Sometimes just plain old virtuosity is fun for its own sake. Like a great pianist playing flawed music but playing it really well.


174 posted on 12/14/2010 1:29:19 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I think you’re the first person to ever agree with me. :)

It was interminable!


175 posted on 12/14/2010 1:34:30 PM PST by Politicalmom (America-The Land of the Sheep, the Home of the Caved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"All films have the boom mike just off the frame. That’s the way they are made. They have to be framed properly so you can’t see it."

I'm aware of that. But there's nothing that would have preveted Speilberg from editing out the frames where the cameraman screwed up. That's what film editors do.

176 posted on 12/14/2010 1:38:36 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

The cameraman did not screw up. Films are made that way. It’s intentional. Projectionists are supposed to frame them properly.


177 posted on 12/14/2010 1:46:02 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
There have been so many unspeakably bad movies that it's not likely Yogi is the worst one ever.

But I have to wonder: who thought Dan Ackroyd was still able to attract an audience?

And if you do go with Ackroyd as the voice of Yogi, wouldn't you want someone compatible to read Boo-Boo's lines?

Would you really go with Justin Timberlake if you've already made the decision to get Ackroyd?

178 posted on 12/14/2010 1:46:02 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
178 comments and no mention of


179 posted on 12/14/2010 2:09:48 PM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umbagi
I have "Plan 9" and "They Saved Hitler's Brain" in a virtual dead heat. Unlike some other movies, they were intended to be campy. They were just bad.

I think I give the edge to "Hitler's Brain" for pure "badness" because it is almost impossible to follow, and is sort of two different movies interspliced together. At least Plan 9 had a plot, ridiculous as it was, that could be followed.

180 posted on 12/14/2010 2:12:01 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson