[jessduntno]

There certainly is a better way than percentages: Flat AMOUNT per person.”

Hahahaha. And what would that amount be? Hahahaha. Thanks.

“You are once again, too concerned with how much the “rich guy” gets to keep.”

MY posts are focused on how much we get to pay ... I dunno what the hell YOU are talking about. A fixed amount? What, like “Gimme 5,000 dollars, screw you pay me?”

No, THAT wouldn’t be progressive. It could be 50% of what one guy has and .0000001 of what someone else has. Cripes. Where do you guys come from? Do you know what that figure would have to be?

Talk about class warfare.

[EyeGuy]

And I don't know what class warfarists like you are doing on a conservative forum. You still haven't explained why a high earner is obligated to pay more in actual dollars to support the government.

A flat amount per person, would not only be the most logically fair, but would also be the SUREST way to dramatically reduce the size and scope of government.

Do I have any idea what that amount would be? A LOT smaller than you would think, that is unless you enjoy the ongoing growth, of the behemoth of government that now exists.

Your posts continue to obsess over comparisons among citizen's, ABILITY TO PAY. That is socialism and wrong, across the board.

Have a nice evening.