A flat amount per person, would not only be the most logically fair, but would also be the SUREST way to dramatically reduce the size and scope of government.
Do I have any idea what that amount would be? A LOT smaller than you would think, that is unless you enjoy the ongoing growth, of the behemoth of government that now exists.
Your posts continue to obsess over comparisons among citizen's, ABILITY TO PAY. That is socialism and wrong, across the board.
Have a nice evening.
“Your posts continue to obsess over comparisons among citizen’s, ABILITY TO PAY. That is socialism and wrong, across the board.”
So what is your figure? You won’t say, because it is just plain wrong headed.
Of course. If they can’t pay, it won’t work. Not a very clear thinker tonight, are you? a PER AMOUNT would be so high there would be a massive inability to pay, leading to default. And no, socialism has never been introduced here. There has never been any mention of socialist programs ... quite the opposite ... what we have now is more socialist because we have so many who pay nothing.
You are imagining this like everyone going out to eat and paying the same. If we did that we’d be eating garbage.
“Do I have any idea what that amount would be? A LOT smaller than you would think...”
And that figure is?