Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calstate Dems involuntarily commit the innocent and let homeless psycho killers run free
Mainestategop ^ | Mainestategop

Posted on 11/20/2010 11:41:47 AM PST by mainestategop

Two days ago, An elderly woman was murdered in front of her sister and onlookers on LA's metro gold line station in Little Tokyo. The station, recently opened a year ago under the new gold line extension into east LA now has its first big incident. An insane drug addicted and mentally ill homeless woman is now in custody for committing the murder.

The killer, a woman named Jackkqueline Pogue committed the offense has a long history of mental illness not to mention an even longer criminal history. She had been thrown out of just about every shelter and welfare housing in the city (which is surprisingly not uncommon given that these shelters and other facilities turn a blind eye to drug use and crime) and had a history of roaming LA's metro stations and trains panhandling and causing trouble.

Under California law including a newly expanded version of the LPS act, she was supposed to have been placed in involuntary commitment, institutionalized for a short period and then required to take medication and attend peer counseling.

That never happened.

In fact at least a year previous she assaulted an elderly man at Pershing square station and a Hispanic woman on the metro red line at Hollywood and Vine. The police did nothing. In fact on LAPD officer commented that nothing could be done anyway since she was mentally ill therefore she would get off easy. That still is no excuse. A woman is now dead thanks to their neglect. This should never have happened.

But the innocent are punished still...

This of course brings me to yet another tragedy. This week or maybe next when I get to it, I intend to publish an article on my blog and elsewhere about a high school graduate who was ready to start her adult life only to have it taken away from her by the state of California and mental health professionals.

Melinda Lee, The granddaughter of Chinese refugees who fled Mao Tse Tung's communist upheaval in China to Taiwan, then America and whose parents wound up embracing him had her whole life ahead of her when all of a sudden it was snatched away just a month after she graduated from High School. This woman had her whole life ahead of her... not anymore.

Melinda was forced into involuntary psychiatric commitment by her parents because according to them, she was awkward and peculiar. Doctors labeled her as having Asperger's syndrome, a form of mental social retardation that is also said to be related to autism. Doctors claimed she didn't fit in and was incapable of becoming an independent adult. All of this was conjecture and hear say. They based it on lies by the parents as well as their own biased opinions just because she was said to be nerdy.

Plenty of kids who are nerdy go on to accomplish great things! Think about people like Bill Gates for example. But no. Liberals want the government to butt in. To that end they make up a stupid disorder and then the government comes in, cancels the God given rights of our constitution and forces them to go through things THEIR way. As a result, poverty and disaster which is what always can be expected evertime government is in control.

Melinda had her whole future destroyed. She was not harmful to herself or anyone, she was an A student, she was a bright intelligent young woman ready to enter the world but instead she had that taken from her. In the coming week You will learn more about how liberalism destroyed her.

Meanwhile Jack Pogue gets to sleep on the streets of skid row, she gets thrown out of every shelter and SRO in the city, she goes around making trouble and nobody does anything! Add to this, California gives away several hundred dollars of your taxes to these people like Pogue for doing no work and they spend it on drugs. It all comes down to her killing an innocent old lady at a train station and only then is she arrested and detained. Unlike Melinda and others who are detained because liberals hate freedom and hate successful people.

Now of course I expect more debates to surface about terminating more of our God given liberties in the name of safety against mentally ill criminals. This despite as I mention already in a previous article Laws to that end already and always have existed, even if Hogue wasn't violent, the fact that she is mentally ill, homeless and unable to care for herself would have been enough for the state o come in and place her in the least restrictive setting possible. This as opposed to Nancy Pelosi putting Melinda Lee in an institution and drugging her into oblivion not to mention Nate Tseglin, a high school student who was institutionalized for being ostracized at school and because his parents were anti communist Russian refugees. Tseglin had a bright future but was drugged into oblivion and now suffers brain damage all thanks to Orange County Liberals.

Until we eject the liberals from the 3 branches of government and from the state assembly in California and other states, we will continue to suffer. So will innocent victims like melinda Lee and Nate Tseglin, and so will the victims and loved ones of violent psychotic homeless.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: civilcommitment; communism; crime; goldline; homeless; jackkqueline; littletokyo; melindalee; murder; pogue; skidrow; train

1 posted on 11/20/2010 11:41:54 AM PST by mainestategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

Sounds as if the young woman’s parents had issues they were projecting onto her. They should have had themselves committed.


2 posted on 11/20/2010 11:59:17 AM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Agreed. The parents BTW were Radical leftists. The mother was a aged hippie BTW.


3 posted on 11/20/2010 12:02:08 PM PST by mainestategop (DonÂ’t Let Freedom Slip Away After America , There is No Place to Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

That makes sense and explains it. It does sound like communism to me.


4 posted on 11/20/2010 12:03:41 PM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

Your life is off to a bad start when your parents can’t even spell your name correctly.


5 posted on 11/20/2010 12:17:36 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

I live in L.A. and I was thinking of Betty Sugiyama this morning. I honestly have no words for what I feel about this heart-breaking loss of life, a sweet, innocent lady gone, killed in front of her sister/life companion. I truly do not believe that “mental illness” makes people kill, but evil does.


6 posted on 11/20/2010 12:30:29 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Yes, I'm a neocon. What of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I truly do not believe that “mental illness” makes people kill, but evil does. My grandmother had a neighbour who was schizophrenic. When she was on her meds, she was a perfectly nice person, when her husband (a deacon at his local church btw) left her and their kids, she stopped taking her meds and became dangerously unhinged, she tried to poison her own son and tried to stab someone else with a pair of scissors. Evantually, she ended up in sheltered housing and got a job as a cleaner in a hospital were they supervised her meds regime.
Now, if mental illness is the result of 'evil' rather than a genuine neurological impairment, are you suggesting that the medication she was on was some kind of holy miracle cure touched by the hand of God, or are you willing to accept that some people behave dangerously due to an actual medical issue caused by the way their brain is wired, as opposed to demonic possession or whatever it is you apparently believe causes this?
7 posted on 11/20/2010 12:48:24 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

If your neighbor tried to stab someone, she should have been tried for assault. Was she? Same thing for the attempted poisoning. Or did she get out of it because of psychiatric testimony?


8 posted on 11/20/2010 1:00:06 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Yes, I'm a neocon. What of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
She was sectioned under the Mental Health Act for assessment and treatment. Her children were taken off her and placed with other family members. She was placed under a sheltered housing scheme where she could be supervised taking her medication and she got a job as a cleaner in a hospital as I said.

You still seem to be under the impression that 'mental illness' is some kind of excuse that was invented by the wicked to get away with crime. I have no doubt that there are some perfectly sane but evil people who do feign mental illness in order to try and soften the punishment for their crimes, but this doesn't mean that every psychiatric assessment pointing to diminished responsibility on the grounds of mental illness is bullshit. There are people out there who because of some traumatic experiences, or just because of the way their brains are wired are genuinely incapable at times of rationale thought or behaviour, and their chief victims are themselves, because they are often unable to form friendships, remain in contact with their family or hold down homes or jobs. Sometimes they attack others in their addled mindset, but in the case of those who are violent they more often turn that violence upon themselves than others. Fortunately, in some cases, as with the woman I mentioned, their illnesses can be treated with therapy and medication and they can live reasonably normal lives. She didn't belong in jail. It would have served no purpose. With treatment she became a contributing member of society and managed to maintain a relationship with her children and have friends. There are people out there who really do genuinely need help, rather than wholesale condemnation.

9 posted on 11/20/2010 1:28:57 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
There are people out there who really do genuinely need help, rather than wholesale condemnation.

Of course there are, and no one is condemning them. Have you ever tried having a reasonable discussion instead of going into histrionics? I was referring to KILLERS and not to everyone who has a psychiatric diagnosis. Good grief. Look at the topic again.

10 posted on 11/21/2010 1:04:46 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Yes, I'm a neocon. What of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Some people are killers because of their psychiatric condition, it isn’t because they are evil, it is because they are afflicted. This woman I mentioned could well have killed someone in her untreated state, but with the right meds and supervision, she was a perfectly decent human being. That is what I am trying to say.


11 posted on 11/21/2010 1:19:49 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I know what you were trying to say. I just don’t like being accused of a sentiment I do not hold. I do not like being accused of condemning all mentally ill persons. That was the argument technique you used, to demonize me because we disagree.


12 posted on 11/21/2010 1:49:21 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Yes, I'm a neocon. What of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Well, with all due respect, saying something like this:

I truly do not believe that “mental illness” makes people kill, but evil does.

Kind of leaves me with the impression that you believe that people who kill whilst in a state of delusion or psychosis are evil, rather than ill. Of course, I'm not sure what your definition of 'evil' is, perhaps I am taking your statement out of context if what you are trying to describe is the affliction itself, rather than the person suffering from it. Although in your other post, you seemed to be implying that the woman I described had somehow escaped justice by not being jailed for acts committed whilst in the grip of untreated psychosis...

13 posted on 11/21/2010 2:30:23 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

And you seem to see the perpetrator as a victim, a very common liberal view. You sound deeply schooled in the psychiatric way of thinking. You want to help everyone. My view is this: you “help” a killer by locking them up and keeping society safe from their evil deeds. Several years ago, a social worker in a small southern California town was murdered by an individual she was trying to help. He came into her office and stabbed her repeatedly. He had a diagnosis of some kind of psychosis and there were other warning signs that he could be violent. It is foolish to try to help someone like that without protecting oneself and others.


14 posted on 11/21/2010 2:44:20 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Yes, I'm a neocon. What of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I do see perpetrator who commits their crimes because of their psychosis as victims, yes. That doesn't mean I'm stupid though. If they are a danger to others and they need to be locked away in a secure facility, that is how it has got to be. I don't really blame them though, they are not really morally culpable for their actions.
And as I say, in some cases, where they can receive help, such as in sheltered living arrangements where their medication regime is supervised, they can live reasonably normal lives, and in cases were this is possible, that is how these people should be dealt with.
You accuse me of being a liberal, believe me, when it comes to perpetrators I view as sane and morally culpable, I advocate a harsh line, especially when it comes to crimes of a violent or sexual nature. But taking a punitive approach to people with mental illness is pointless and wrong. Your use of the phrase 'psychiatric thinking' means that it seems to me that you still seem to disbelieve in the concept of mental illness. I believe you have an emotionally punitive motivation for your desire to lock up people who are dangerously ill, not merely a practical one.
15 posted on 11/21/2010 5:05:13 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson