Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Gives a Pass: TSA Won’t Touch Muslims’ Junk
Floyd Reports ^ | Nov. 16, 2010 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 11/16/2010 7:43:43 AM PST by EternalVigilance

Thirty-one-year-old John Tyner, a 31-year-old recently unleashed the “Don’t tase me, Bro” moment of airport security. While about to receive a genital check from TSA security, Tyner agreed to a search of non-intimate areas but said, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested.” However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.

CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.

“Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”

Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”

So, Muslim women will not be subject to a full body scan or a pat-down on much of their elaborately concealed bodies. Feeling secure yet?

Add this to the growing proof that political correctness is not merely totalitarian but suicidal. The president made an exception to airline security protocol big enough to drive a jihad through — and applied it only to the adherents of Islam. Roman Catholic nuns can be groped en masse, but Obama rushed to defend the dignity of Muslim women.

Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear. Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airports; bhoislamism; cair; crushislam; democrats; dhimmicrats; friskingnuns; imamobama; islam; islamofascism; islamuberalles; mullahobama; muslims; obama; palin; security; terrorism; tsa; tsapervs; tsascanners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last
To: EternalVigilance
CAIR...has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.

Makes for a nice story, now show me the "guarantee."

61 posted on 11/16/2010 8:14:25 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

putting aside for a moment debates about the best and appropriate forms of security screening for air travel, the idea that MUSLIMS of all people are to be exempt from intrusive security screening that the rest of us go through is so offensive on every level

so now all the rest of this are supposed to go through these types of screenings while any jihad terrorist can sail through .... yeah, this makes the TSA both pointless AND incompetent


62 posted on 11/16/2010 8:14:25 AM PST by Enchante (What if the Olberdork returned to the air - and no one notices.... or cares?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“CNSNews.com has reported...”

I’m going to need a little verification there before getting excited.


63 posted on 11/16/2010 8:16:27 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Starve the beast. Save the liver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
“In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”

CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.

So our government is now abiding by Islamic Law.

We need to have riots in the streets about this. Apparently it is the only effective way to communicate with our government.

Threats of violence it now appears is the only effective way to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Flying is not a constitutional right. If it violates their religious sensibilities to be searched they should choose another mode of transportation.

Either all must submit to searches or none shall. We do not have special rights in this country.

64 posted on 11/16/2010 8:18:49 AM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabrial
Thanks. I agree that distortions like this should not be posted as fact.

I would have a serious problem reconciling THAT dichotomy. After some followup research, I found that this is on the CAIR wish list, but I did find that it was quite prolific on the Internet.

65 posted on 11/16/2010 8:19:18 AM PST by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Would YOU want to touch muzzie “junk?”

I didn’t think so.


66 posted on 11/16/2010 8:19:38 AM PST by Dick Bachert (11/2 was a good start. Let's finish the job in 2012. U Pubbies stay strong!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

exactly, the report is that CAIR is instructing people there is no evidence yet the TSA is supporting CAIR’s proposal.


67 posted on 11/16/2010 8:19:38 AM PST by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Freep Mail Call for you.


68 posted on 11/16/2010 8:19:57 AM PST by Global2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

The only thing verified is that CAIR do suggest head and neck pat downs are the only pat down appropriate. But when? CAIR contend if secondary screening is the result of wearing the head scarf only that area should be patted down. They tell Muslim women to ask if the extra screening is because of the headscarf.


69 posted on 11/16/2010 8:20:12 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

A government without constitutional restraints terrorizes its own citizens. We are being subjected to systematic terrorism by our government, and once they (the fascist pigs) intimidate and beat us down on one issue, they will move on to the next one. The Muslim terrorist are winning. They are beating us on our own home front, and here is where we need to fight back, even if it means fighting back against our own government.


70 posted on 11/16/2010 8:21:27 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

OK...shaved my stash, got a big black MooMoo and a black head scarf. Now I beez muslim for TSA.

I have the solution....muslims may not be allowed to fly. Period. Solves everyone’s problems.


71 posted on 11/16/2010 8:21:49 AM PST by halfright (My presidents picture is in the dictionary, next to the word, "rectum".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Can you please chime in on the position a Catholic should take about these physical pat downs?

We don't fly(for obvious to you reasons).

I keep thinking of the fellows on Crossing the Goal and what they would say about this as a boundary or non boundary issue.

72 posted on 11/16/2010 8:24:17 AM PST by Global2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

New saying should be “Don’t TSA me Bro”.


73 posted on 11/16/2010 8:25:10 AM PST by Global2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I will simply declare that I am a Muslim woman when I go through.


74 posted on 11/16/2010 8:25:42 AM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

The scanners and searches ALSO violate Jewish and Christian belief (or “law”). Assert your 1st Amendment rights.


You would think it would be obvious, yet seems that Muslims have become a protected class....Hope some group is bring a lawsuit on this one...I want congress critters first in the pat-down line, second would be anyone in a burqa or hijab! I cannot believe they will put a 3 year old thru the trama of a pat down, but not a muslim woman.


75 posted on 11/16/2010 8:28:20 AM PST by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

"Don't touch me junk!"

76 posted on 11/16/2010 8:28:22 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

TSA = TRAINED SEXUAL ASSAULT


77 posted on 11/16/2010 8:28:34 AM PST by sniper63 (I am the leader of the TEA Party, I, myself am the leader of me, myself for I am the TEA Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I see two constitutional issues - establishment of a religion and equal protection under the law.


78 posted on 11/16/2010 8:29:02 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

I agree. If everyone would say they refuse screenings because they are Muslim, what would they do? Just not let anyone fly? How can they prove someone is or is not Muslim (not that it should matter)?


79 posted on 11/16/2010 8:30:06 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pecos
Me too!!! Let's feel up granny she might be a suicide bomber. And let's sexually molest little kids. But, don't touch the very people who are trying to kill us. That makes so much sense.

Something really bad is going to happen on obama's watch.

80 posted on 11/16/2010 8:33:24 AM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson