Posted on 11/13/2010 7:26:23 PM PST by Nachum
Mark Ritchie file 1 here
Controversial Minnesota Democratic - Farmer - Labor Party Secretary of State Mark Ritchie was formerly a key member of radical socialist "alternative" political party - a party that helped launch the political career of Barack Obama.
In the early 1990s, the now defunct New Party was founded as a left wing adjunct to and eventual replacement for the Democratic Party.
While New Party leaders always touted their party as non socialist and analysis of its leadership gives lie to that claim.
New Party News Fall 1994 listed over 100 activists -"some of the community leaders, organizers, retirees,, scholars, artists, parents, students, doctors, writers and other activists who are building the NP"
Of the hundred or so activists listed many were affiliated to ACORN, Democratic Socialists of America, the Communist Party USA offshoot Committees of Correspondence, or the far left Institute for Policy Studies - once described by analyst Brian Crozier as the "perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB."
Mark Ritchie's New Party comrades included;
From New Party News Spring 1996 page 1;
Mark Ritchie, as Minnesota Secretary of state has the responsibility of overseeing electoral recounts. This resulted in considerable controversy in 2009 when Ritchie handed a U.S Senate seat to leftist former comedian Al Franken, though his Republican opponent was ahead on election night.
Now Mark Ritchie is set to oversee another recount that could put leftist Democrat and long time Ritchie associate Mark Dayton in the Minnesota Governor's mansion.
Interestingly Ritchie serves on Advisory committee of Wellstone Action with Franken, Dayton and Democratic Socialists of America member, New Party founder and Progressives for Obama endorser Frances Fox Piven.
The fact that Mark Ritchie once helped lead a covertly socialist political party with close ties to President Barack Obama must cast doubt on his impartiality and suitability for the position.
ping
We should really push for re-starting the House Un-American Activities Committee...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee
Next are lights, cameras and microphones. Let's talk, shall we?
;-\
“We should really push for re-starting the House Un-American Activities Committee...”
before you do that push better educated the public or the Dems will just knock it out of the water shouting ‘McCarthyism’. The Communists have done their work for years.
“The fact that Mark Ritchie once helped lead a covertly socialist political party with close ties to President Barack Obama must cast doubt on his impartiality and suitability for the position.”
I thought the British were most recognized for their use of the understatement. Is this author British?
”Barbara Ehrenreich Democratic Socialists of America leader, Institute for Policy Studies trustee and in 2008, founder of Progressives for Obama”
Rosa Brooks
Rosa Brooks serves as senior advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michele Flournoy, and in May 2010 she also became , running a new Pentagon office dedicated to those issues. She is on leave from her job as a law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she also served as Director of Georgetown Law School’s Human Rights Center. Brooks is known as a columnist, an expert on human rights and law of war issues, and a foreign policy commentator. At the Pentagon her portfolio has included both human rights issues and global engagement and strategic communication.
In 1991 Brooks earned a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard University, where she studied history and literature;http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/facinfo/tab_faculty.cfm?Status=Faculty&ID=2133 while an undergraduate at Harvard, Brooks served as president of the Phillips Brooks House Association. At Oxford University she was awarded a Master of Studies degree in social anthropology in 1993, and was a Marshall Scholar. In 1996 she completed her studies at Yale Law School, which conferred upon her the title of Juris Doctor.
Brooks’ work history has included previous government service as a senior adviser to Assistant Secretary Harold Hongju Koh at the U.S. Department of State, five years as an associate professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, and a stint as Special Counsel to the President at the Open Society Institute, George Soros’ philanthropic foundation. She is the former director of Yale Law School’s human rights program, and she has taught at both Yale and at Harvard. She has also been a consultant for Human Rights Watch, a fellow at he Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard, a board member of Amnesty International USA, a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a member of the Executive Council of the American Society of International Law.
In 2004 she served as a foreign policy advisor to the Kerry-Edwards campaign, and she was a supporter of Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign. She has been a board member of the National Security Network, a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Fragile States, and a member of the steering committee of the White Oak Foreign Policy Leaders Project. She has traveled and worked around the world, including in Iraq, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Indonesia, China, Sierra Leone, Uganda, and Russia.
Brooks’ scholarly work has focused on terrorism and rule of law issues, international law, human rights, law of war, and failed states. Along with Jane Stromseth and David Wippman, Brooks coauthored Can Might Make Rights? Building the Rule of Law After Military Interventions (2006), a book which helped shape the United States Army’s praxis of rule of law. Brooks is also the author of numerous scholarly articles published in law reviews.http://rosabrooks.squarespace.com/war-everywhere/
As a popular and influential columnist in addition to a scholar, her byline has appeared in publications all over the world, ranging from Harper’s Magazine to the Washington Post, and in 2005 she began a weekly op-ed column for the Los Angeles Times. Her writings focused on foreign policy, human rights, and national security issues, and occasionally spanned other topics, including economics and culture. to a humorous take on parenting.. (Brooks has two young children). Brooks retired the column upon her appointment to the United States Department of Defense.
Brooks has been a frequent guest and panelist on MSNBC (The Rachel Maddow Show, Race for the White House, Countdown, and Tucker), a commentator on Bloggingheads.tv , and a blogger for Slate Magazine’s XX Factor. She has also appeared several times on Fox’s The O’Reilly Factor. In May 2007 she wrote a lighhearted column poking fun at O’Reilly’s bluster.. O’Reilly has periodically vilified and attacked her ever since, particular when she was appointed to an influential position at the Pentagon.
In her work as a columnist, Brooks has been recognized by liberals for her courage and outspokenness, and her remarks have at times generated backlash from the political right.When she was appointed by Barack Obama to a Pentagon advisory position in April 2009, conservatives attacked her. Conservative commentators like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity labelled her one of the “Top Ten Most Dangerous Obama Czars.” http://polijamblog.polijam.com/?p=7515/-/, while the Washington Times wrote an editorial denouncing her appointment.. Her Pentagon and military colleagues came to her defense,, and the attacks gradually died down as she established a reputation for principled but pragmatic leadership, especially in complex areas such as information operations.
Most of the initial conservative attacks focused on her criticism of Bush administration’s use of so-called torture against suspected terror detainees. She was also critical of the decision to go to war in Iraq, though she has recently taken a view cautiously supporting a slow and phased withdrawal.
In 2007, she wrote that prior to 9/11, “most experts say... al-Qaida was little more than an obscure group of extremist thugs, well financed and intermittently lethal but relatively limited in their global and regional political pull. On 9/11, they got lucky. Today, thanks to U.S. policies, Al-Qaida has become the vast global threat the administration imagined it to be in 2001. Our ham-handed detention and interrogation tactics and our ill-advised invasion of Iraq have alienated vast swathes of the Islamic world, fueling extremism and anti-Americanism. Today, Al Qaeda is no longer a single organization. Now it’s a franchise, with new gangs of terrorists around the world proudly seizing the “Al Qaeda” affiliation.”
She has also penned a 2006 column in which she wrote that President “Bush...authorized practices that even [former Attorney General] Gonzales predicted might be seen by ‘future prosecutors’ as violations of the War Crimes Act,” and that “it’s far too late for [Bush] to leave a legacy that won’t be a source of shame to future generations.”
She has been occasionally been a critic of some policies of the State of Israel. According to Brooks, “In the United States today, it just isn’t possible to have a civil debate about Israel, because any serious criticism of its policies is instantly countered with charges of anti-Semitism.”
Brooks has also been an advocate for increased taxpayer-funds for public media (such as National Public Radio and public and community broadcasting). In April 2009 she asserted that “Years of foolish policies have left us with a choice: We can bail out journalism, using tax dollars and granting [broadcast] licenses in ways that encourage robust and independent reporting and commentary, or we can watch, wringing our hands, as more and more top journalists are laid off.”
As a supporter of sending more troops to Afghanistan and an advocate of a robust and well-funded counter-insurgency and counter-terrorism strategy, and as an occasionally sharp critic of prominent Democrats (including Hillary Clinton), Brooks has also sometimes annoyed the political left.
In December 2008, for instance, she warned “Democrats still basking in the reflected glory of Obama’s win” that “Idiocy and greed aren’t just for Republicans. For every Larry Craig, there’s an Eliot Spitzer; for every Ted Stevens, there’s a Rod Blagojevich.... [I]t’s precisely when a party achieves power that its members need to start worrying the most about idiocy and greed.... [P]ower really does corrupt. But illegal corruption isn’t the only thing Democrats should be on guard against.... Members of political majorities succumb easily to smugness and complacency, to the conviction that explaining and justifying ideas is no longer necessary, to the temptation to dismiss critics as so many irrelevant cranks. “Groupthink” is mainly a disease of the powerful and complacent, not the fractious opposition.”
On economics, Brooks is a progressive/liberal populist. She has skwewered the Bush administration’s alleged mishandling of the economy , argued for addressing the economic crisis with New Deal-style programs,, and decried large bailouts for financial firms.
The daughter of best-selling author Barbara Ehrenreich (Nickel and Dimed) and psychologist John Ehrenreich, Brooks currently lives in Virginia with her family.
Books
(with co-authors Jane Stromseth and David Wippman Cambridge University Press, 2006).
A Garden of Paper Flowers (Picador, 1994) (under the name Rosa Ehrenreich; later articles are credited to Rosa Ehrenreich Brooks)
Other Notable Publications
Failed States, or the State as Failure?, 72 U. Chicago L. Rev. 1159 (2005)
War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror, 153 U. Pennsylvania L. Rev. 675 (2004).The New Imperialism: Violence, Norms & Rule of Law, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 2275 (2003).
Law in the Heart of Darkness: Atrocity & Duress,’’ 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 861 (2003).
http://reference.findtarget.com/search/Rosa%20Brooks/
Rosa Brooks is commie Barbara Ehrenreich’ daughter. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
He’s a terrific Australian.
I’m all for it but imagine the outcry. The Repubs just need to be more vocal about these commies Obama has and is employing.
OK, That explains it ;) Thanks for your response.
The thug is closely allied with the moveon thugs -
http://www.letfreedomringblog.com/?p=1882
You’re welcome. You’ve got great decernment skills. :)
OMgosh... for a minute there I was thinking that this is the guy that Clinton pardoned... no, his name was Mark Rich.
Too close for comfort, though.
Is that one of those guys who was part of the George Soros plot to take over the secretary of state positions to make it easier to steal elections and thus power? Is there any info on their funding?
Not sure. You would have to do searches on the people, the organizations and public comments. That’s is how I would follow the money.
“Next are lights, cameras and microphones. Let’s talk, shall we? “
No teleprompters?
Thanks for the info!!
It would seem that this guy and his party is the “missing link” between Bummer and Soros. I’ve wondered who our president really is, and now I have no doubt at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.