Posted on 10/25/2010 8:54:13 AM PDT by maggief
Our latest interview with the White House Insider reveals a Democratic Party civil war, with growing opposition to the Obama White House.
Authors Note: This interview took place for nearly two hours over the weekend at the office of the White House Insider. We wish to extend our gratitude for their making time to meet with us despite an extremely demanding schedule. The information contained in this interview is among the most in depth and fascinating to date, and due to the extent of information, will come in two installments. Here is installment one:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsflavor.com ...
Thanks STARWISE. This White House insider could have been talking about anyone’s reaction to Zero’s behavior.
I just read part two.
None of this sounds even remotely authentic.
White House Insider: "0bama is lost. Absolutely lost."
"...how fast it all went wrong, how soon we all started to see that there was so little to the man. We got caught up in the moment, and forgot to consider the consequences of electing someone who was simply not prepared to be president.
Part Two:
[Thanks, maggief.]
Some people (most apparently) think this is all made up.
I don’t know.
I do know 0bastard’s going crazy.
I think the interviews may be authentic.
Thank you for the ping Lucy. I think we can figure out what this is all about now. What we have suspected all along. Probably the reason Rahm got the hell out of there. Probably why Axelrod is getting out early next year. Rats are abandoning the sinking ship hoping they won’t drown. Watch for Holder to get out, then you know the you know what is getting ready to hit the fan.
Oh and Stern, one day he was there, then O disappeared from the press that morning, remember that? When he was supposed to be at a soccer game, only there wasn’t one? Then Stern just quits out of the blue. I think we all know Andy Stern, he wouldn’t just quit unless there was a damn good reason and it can’t be pretty that’s for sure.
see #243
popcorn ping!
this episode is really reading like a novella..writer33, is that you????
Uses a lot of expletives, doesn’t he? I wonder if this “insider” has the initials R.E.? (Or at least the author wants us to think so.)
Thanks for the ping!
Thanks....getting interesting.
I don’t believe a word of it, but it was fun to read.
Narcissistic Personality Disorders with a huge degree of
Reactive Attachment Disorder
reared by Marxist idiots . . .
HAD to be a huge ‘accident’ eager to happen from the beginning.
He had to be chosen by the puppet masters partly because of those features. They would NOT be that ignorant about such things.
He has to be some sort of scape-goat stooge to blame the chaos on that he was tasked with helping to create.
Sep 11: newsflavor.com / the-president-is-losing-it
Sep 15: newsflavor.com / the-president-needs-to-grow-up
Sep 18: newsflavor.com / what-the-hell-have-we-done
Sep 21: newsflavor.com / the-clintons-are-going-for-it
Sep 27: newsflavor.com / obama-battling-severe-depression
Oct 03: newsflavor.com / obama-offering-hillary-clinton-vice-president-position
Oct 07: newsflavor.com / pelosi-and-obama-at-war
Oct 13: newsflavor.com / michelle-obama-blowout
Oct 18: newsflavor.com / coming-soon-serious-white-house-scandal
Oct 25: newsflavor.com / they-were-in-shock-at-the-presidents-behavior
Oct 26: newsflavor.com / president-obama-is-lost-absolutely-lost
Sounds like we aren't far from the point where the "brown suits" enter the narrative...
“Ive been following this for a couple of months and peg the Insider as Rahm Emmanuel or somebody very close to him.”
Following what? What? What? What?
Newsflavor? Who is this guy?
Hillbuzz article is even juicier!
Links to the other past articles appear at the bottom of this article. He makes it very clear in these that he was an actual insider at one point in time, but now relies on contacts with others who are on the inside. I think he makes that clear in this later article as well. When he is talking about the meeting with Obama then he says that he is long gone from the scene.
Personally It seems to me that everything he is saying fits well with not only what we are seeing, but in what was predicted behavior for O as a Narcissist. This behavior was all predicted before he became president. The next stage predicted is when O feels that he cannot trust those who got him elected. Things could get real doomy for the US at that point. He would be expected to lash out in very irrational and dangerous ways.
If you missed it then go read this for an eye opener
http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html
“Heres some of what Dan Morain said about Yesse Yehudah in 2008:
As a presidential candidate, Obama has been critical of the congressional system of doling out money for pet projects. But he is no stranger to pork-barrel politics and the practice of spreading government money around his district. In Springfield he once directed state funds to a nonprofit group headed by a Republican and former ballot foe, Yesse B. Yehudah.
Yehudah barely registered a ripple of meaningful opposition, drawing only 10% of the vote in his 1998 challenge of Obama.
The following year, a nonprofit run by Yehudah, a social services organization called Fulfilling Our Responsibility Unto Mankind, began seeking state support. At the same time, Obama was considering mounting an ambitious challenge to U.S. Rep. Bobby L. Rush, a fellow Democrat.
Former foe Yehudah stepped up early to help. In November 1999, five people who worked for the Republicans nonprofit organization each gave $1,000 checks to Obamas congressional campaign committee. Yehudah makes no secret of his goal.
We want [politicians] to know that when we sit down, were serious, Yehudah said. They know it when a $1,000 check comes in.
Obama lost his congressional bid. President Clinton backed incumbent Rush, who received twice as many primary votes as Obama. Obama was left with a $40,000 debt.
Later that year, Yehudah associates pitched in an additional $5,000 to help retire Obamas debt. The contributions were recorded on Oct. 7, 2000, three days after the Illinois Senate, at Obamas behest, approved a $75,000 state grant to Yehudahs nonprofit, state records show.
In an interview, Yehudah said the commitment for the grant was secured months earlier, in July. He called timing of the donations a coincidence.
The donations were modest by political standards, as was Obamas relatively small assist to the nonprofit group of his ex-rival and new benefactor. But in Illinois, government actions often occur around the time of campaign donations, said Stewart of the Better Government Assn. The answer is always the same: Its always a coincidence.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton said there was no connection between the campaign donations and the grant to Yehudahs organization. Of course not, he said.
By 2002, Obama was preparing for his next challenge, a run for the U.S. Senate. Also that year, the Illinois attorney general sued Yehudah over allegations of kickbacks unrelated to the state grant. It was settled out of court.
Three days after the suit was filed, Obama returned one batch of donations totaling $5,000.
This Yehudah business is tied into Tony Rezko, because Tony Rezko had his hand in almost every crooked deal like this back then and many of you probably know Rezko as being the man who helped Obama buy his house (by buying the land next door, that the Obamas could not afford, so that they could meet the purchase stipulation for the propety, which required both the house and the adjacent land to be bought on the same day).
Rezko is connected to the Giannoulias Mob Banking family through Broadway Bank, which many of Rezkos crooked deals laundered money through. Rezko made deposits, then the Giannoulias family would loan large sums to all sorts of criminals, with Alexi himself claiming he never knew the extent of their criminal operations.
All of this ties into Rod Blagojevich, Rahm Emanuel, Jan Schakowsky, Mayor Daley, Valerie Jarrett, and all sorts of other crooks you know who are in various positions of power and prominence, because they all took money from the same corrupt troughs, got rich off various Chicago area land deals and other schemes, and made sure thieir relatives and personal friends all received Michelle Obama-style consulting fees whenever possible. This is how Chicago works.
So, if there is a Big Scandal it is most likely related to someone out there being ingenious enough to connect all the various scams and schemes this cast of characters was engaged in and present it in a way that the public understands with all the crimes, graft, bribes, and pay-to-play corruption pointing right to Obama himself.”
Interesting
is this serious or just satire?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.