Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How can New Jersey imprison a gun owner who broke no laws? (7 years for Legal firearms!)
http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/how-can-new-jersey-imprison-a-gun-owner-who-broke-no-laws ^

Posted on 10/23/2010 8:13:37 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA

"Hey David," the Facebook message began, "Thought you might be interested in Brian Aitken, in jail in NJ for 7 years for owning legal guns."

....

At trial Brian Aitken’s defense team showed the jury Brian’s three FBI background checks to lawfully purchase firearms, a number of witnesses—including a Mount Laurel police officer—testified that Brian was moving between residences and all witnesses—including the Mount Laurel police officer—testified that Brian’s firearms were unloaded & locked in the trunk of his car exactly as New Jersey State Law requires…Brian knew how to do this because he had called the New Jersey State Police days earlier to ensure he was in compliance with the law…a fact the Judge ruled inadmissible in the court room.

Now, this 26 year old small business owner—with no prior criminal record—is sitting in jail for 7 years simply because a Judge, since removed for misconduct in a different case, refused to allow the jury to apply the state law that allows abiding gun owners to transport their legally owned firearms from one house to another.

The jury returned from deliberation three times practically begging the Judge to tell them the law that protects an individuals rights to transport firearms—the Judge outright refused to tell them!

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; brianaitken; codrea; examiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
This judge should be in prison.

Effing ridiculuous.....the firarms community needs to rally behind this poor guy.

1 posted on 10/23/2010 8:13:41 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The jury should have told the judge to f himself and either nullified the law or found the accused INNOCENT.


2 posted on 10/23/2010 8:18:10 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

“The charges against me are non-violent and victimless. I did everything I could to follow the letter of the law; I checked the State Statutes, I contacted the New Jersey State Police… I did everything by-the-book. The Courts don’t seem to care. My son has gone fatherless for over one-third of his life because of a charge without merit. It’s time for this to end.”

http://www.the-912-project.com/2009/07/26/brian-aitken-follows-new-jersey-gun-laws-and-now-faces-7-years-in-prison/


3 posted on 10/23/2010 8:20:40 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
The jury should have told the judge to f himself

Yeah, what's up with a jury like that?

The jury exists for the sole purpose of protecting the accused from crooked judges, prosecutors or unjust laws.

4 posted on 10/23/2010 8:28:24 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Judges and politicians ignore the law and the Constitution to do what they think is right. I am against this.

Jury nullification is when people sitting on a jury ignore the law in the name of justice. I am a proponent of this because the power is with the citizens.

5 posted on 10/23/2010 8:28:24 PM PDT by Teotwawki (To Him be the glory throughout all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
The jury returned from deliberation three times practically begging the Judge to tell them the law that protects an individuals rights to transport firearms—the Judge outright refused to tell them!

Jury failed. They should have nullified right then and there. As much the jury's fault as the judge's.

6 posted on 10/23/2010 8:28:33 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Until we have an educated populace that sits on juries, we’ll continue to have these findings....sucks, but true ;


7 posted on 10/23/2010 8:29:28 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Ought to be the damnable judge in prison for seven years for this kind of judicial misconduct.

Pathetic example of an activist judge imposing his will ahead of the letter of the law.


8 posted on 10/23/2010 8:29:31 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Judge my A$$. What frikkin’ out of control wannabe Law and Order prosecuter brought this case before the Judge in the first place?


9 posted on 10/23/2010 8:29:50 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I agree. Why in the world would a jury find this man guilty?

All 12 must have voted guilty. Not one juror had enough doubt, or enough courage. This is very odd.


10 posted on 10/23/2010 8:32:20 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Surely this will be fixed on appeal.


11 posted on 10/23/2010 8:33:12 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
The jury exists for the sole purpose of protecting the accused from crooked judges, prosecutors or unjust laws.

The dumbing down of America has indeed taken its toll in too many ways to count.

I hope we can fix it....

12 posted on 10/23/2010 8:33:52 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA


This judge should be in prison.”

I’m beginning to think that should be the case for at least 90% of the judges in our country now.


13 posted on 10/23/2010 8:35:14 PM PDT by proudofthesouth (I Still Hate Commies Even After They Changed Their Names To Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
Surely this will be fixed on appeal.

Whilst a man is sitting in a prison cell.....such a comforting thought to him I'm sure.

14 posted on 10/23/2010 8:35:40 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

Can Christie pardon him? If so why hasn’t he?


15 posted on 10/23/2010 8:37:04 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Been on a jury lately? Last time I was on one, the judge specifically instructed us that we can’t nullify. I know my rights, so I’m not cowed by the judge, but I suspect >>90% of jurors will blindly follow.


16 posted on 10/23/2010 8:37:27 PM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Can’t Governor Christie pardon this guy? He certainly should, IMHO. What about appeals?


17 posted on 10/23/2010 8:39:28 PM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecabal
Right on FRiend, the jury has the final say.

The judge can suck eggs.

18 posted on 10/23/2010 8:40:58 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thecabal
the judge specifically instructed us that we can’t nullify

Don't have to call it nullification, all you have to say is "not guilty". Tricky part is getting the slugs that usually get on juries to agree with you. My wife found that out and hung a gun case jury.

19 posted on 10/23/2010 8:43:52 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thecabal

Please explain....my husband has a recall to jury duty coming up....he needs more info


20 posted on 10/23/2010 8:45:10 PM PDT by goodnesswins (f you don't support Obama, and the deconstruction of America: YOU are a RACIST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson