O'Donnell doesn't express herself well, at all. She comes off looking and sounding like a high-school kid. Sadly, she was correct but incoherent in her explanation.
Some think it was a trap. It’s hard to predict that Coons would screw up the 1A that badly.
She left it open ended. Perhaps she realized that leaving it that way would invite the controversy that she could play upon later. Not sure either way.
It would be cool if Clarence Thomas could do an ad for Christine. I believe that’s probably illegal, maybe?
He graduated from Yale Law, and wrote a concurrence in the Elk Grove case where he said that there should be no incorporation re establishment clause.
Shame on you Chris Coons for getting the 1A so completely wrong. says Clarence Thomas.
There’s also a decent chance that anything that isn’t part of her attack would be considered “off message” So, it’s possible that Coons error was intentionally designed to take Christine off message.
No harm having the Fox Conservatives tonight explaining how Chris Coons reading of the 1A is very very wrong. In fact, Chris Coons is the stupid one.
Maybe correct; I didn’t see a video of it. However, any group of honest un-brainwashed students of the law would have known what she meant. If I could readily understand her question, they should have been able to also. Also, if you listen closely to the exchange, her opponent [amidst the laughter said “Good question...”, thinking he had a good answer to he question]. She was in enemy territory and I think did quite well for not having been trained for combat.