Posted on 10/13/2010 6:31:01 PM PDT by Talkradio03
O'Donnell to Christ Coons: "If you're saying what I said on a comedy show is relevant to this election, then absolutely, you writing an article saying you learned your beliefs from articulate intelligent Marxist professor and that what's made you become a Democrat, that should send chills up the spine of every Delaware voter" (Video)
(Excerpt) Read more at hapblog.com ...
Blow it out your behind.
What was the point in that poster’s useless, snotty assertion that O’Donnell has “baggage”?
Who cares? She’s the nominee. Winning is all that matters now.
Anyway, when that poster you are defending “cleverly” crafted together a sentence that combined a vicious swipe at Rove with a negative comment about O’Donnell, my spidey sense started to tingle. It left a stench. ..Just like your post did. So go play with yourself.
But saddened that so many self-described conservatives are apparently stupid enough to think a blithering idiot like Christine O'Donnell is our political savior from Obamunism? Yes.
My two cents: Just tone it down a bit until after the election. What will be will be. I’ve gotten in a few digs here and there, but I mean, she’s the candidate. It’s too late now. Save the post mortems for POST mortem, as much as you can.
As I often say, if you are disappointed, your expectations were too high. Lower them, accept it, and move on.
What baggage?
Try falsifying her resume for starters. And I don't care if she had student loans to pay off - that's not a mark against her. But lying about it by claiming a degree before she had it, along with inflating multiple other claims such as the line about obtaining a certification from Oxford, is indeed a problem. It suggests she has an issue with being forthright and truthful. And that is baggage I'd rather not have from our candidates.
So the clown from Minny can be a Senator, but O’Donnell just does not haver the right stuff? What is the right stuff, McCain or Lindsay Graham? She is better than 33% of the GOP Senators currently in office.
The left is already trying to pile O'Donnell's baggage onto Angle because they both attended events at the Claremont Institute, both are perceived as Tea Party women etc., even though Angle has nothing to do with O'Donnell. Propping her up and pretending there's nothing wrong with her only makes the left's case easier for them, and we lose 3 races instead of just 1.
Good troll bait thread...
It’s worse than that. O’Donnell will be a black eye for the tea party. But look on the bright side. Our populace is so stupid in 6 months they won’t even remember Christine O’Donnell. Then again, from what I can tell, COD will find a way to stay in front of the camera==her favorite place to be. Maybe she can become a FOX analyst.
Exactly where did I ever say Franken was Senatorial material? Oh wait. Never. Although I do find it odd that the only bar you set for our candidates is that they must be better than Franken. That’s kinda like defining “physical fitness” by simply weighing less than Rosie O’Donnell.
You could write a new chapter in "How To Win Friends and Influence People."
Here's a quote from somebody smarter than I:
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat." THEODORE ROOSEVELT (Paris Sorbonne,1910)
COD is in the arena, you are nothing but a loudmouthed critic.
O'Donnell did OK in the debate, but she did not pull off a game-changing performance.
And let's face facts: if the Democrats ran a candidate for Senator who sued her old boss for "gender discrimination" with the ultra-liberal EEOC, who hadn't held down a job for seven years, who failed to pay a mortgage and then sold the house to an employee of her campaign whom she was dating at the time, and was now living in an apartment rented for her by her campaign we would be having a field day over it.
I find it extremely hard to believe that the only possible choices for GOP voters in DE were a stooge like Castle and a person who can't even run her own life.
O'Donnell may be our only shot, but it takes gall to call someone a coward because they notice the emperor has no clothes.
Who cares? She’s the nominee. Winning is all that matters now.
Gee. Sounds awfully similar to what came out of the Clinton camp circa the early 90's when all the Whitewater/Paula Jones/Gennifer Flowers/Troopergate stuff started trickling out about Bubba.
O'Donnell did OK in the debate, but she did not pull off a game-changing performance.
And let's face facts: if the Democrats ran a candidate for Senator who sued her old boss for "gender discrimination" with the ultra-liberal EEOC, who hadn't held down a job for seven years, who failed to pay a mortgage and then sold the house to an employee of her campaign whom she was dating at the time, and was now living in an apartment rented for her by her campaign we would be having a field day over it.
I find it extremely hard to believe that the only possible choices for GOP voters in DE were a stooge like Castle and a person who can't even run her own life.
O'Donnell may be our only shot, but it takes gall to call someone a coward because they notice the emperor has no clothes.
O'Donnell did OK in the debate, but she did not pull off a game-changing performance.
And let's face facts: if the Democrats ran a candidate for Senator who sued her old boss for "gender discrimination" with the ultra-liberal EEOC, who hadn't held down a job for seven years, who failed to pay a mortgage and then sold the house to an employee of her campaign whom she was dating at the time, and was now living in an apartment rented for her by her campaign we would be having a field day over it.
I find it extremely hard to believe that the only possible choices for GOP voters in DE were a stooge like Castle and a person who can't even run her own life.
O'Donnell may be our only shot, but it takes gall to call someone a coward because they notice the emperor has no clothes.
I am so very impressed with your emotional maturity - juvenile name calling right up there with an 8th grader.
I am in Delaware. I am encouraging everyone I know to vote for COD. That said, I have found constructive comments by other posters to be insightful and valuable. If you disagree, so be it.
I voted for Gerald Ford over Carter in 1976. That decision did not make Gerald Ford a rocket scientist.
One can still agree with Karl Rove and concurrently support and vote for COD. Why is this concurrent viewpoint so threatening?
But if you want a realistic assessment of the political situation in Delaware as it stands right now, pull your lips off of Christine O'Donnell's ass and ask yourself what exactly did she do, other than not being Mike Castle, to deserve this senate nod.
Great post. Sounds pretty much right on to me.
And let's face facts: if the Democrats ran a candidate for Senator who sued her old boss for "gender discrimination" with the ultra-liberal EEOC, who hadn't held down a job for seven years, who failed to pay a mortgage and then sold the house to an employee of her campaign whom she was dating at the time, and was now living in an apartment rented for her by her campaign we would be having a field day over it.
Well said. And if you want proof of exactly that I've got two words: Alvin Greene.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.