O'Donnell did OK in the debate, but she did not pull off a game-changing performance.
And let's face facts: if the Democrats ran a candidate for Senator who sued her old boss for "gender discrimination" with the ultra-liberal EEOC, who hadn't held down a job for seven years, who failed to pay a mortgage and then sold the house to an employee of her campaign whom she was dating at the time, and was now living in an apartment rented for her by her campaign we would be having a field day over it.
I find it extremely hard to believe that the only possible choices for GOP voters in DE were a stooge like Castle and a person who can't even run her own life.
O'Donnell may be our only shot, but it takes gall to call someone a coward because they notice the emperor has no clothes.
And very poised.
People like people like her.
The only things that she said that I didn't like is 1) she said she wants to protect Social Security, and 2) she said we should provide medical care to people without money and then just send them a bill. Why waste a stamp? Once they receive free care, the horse has left the barn.
Without a saddle.
Go Christine!!
O'Donnell may be our only shot, but it takes gall to call someone a coward because they notice the emperor has no clothes.
And it takes a dupe like you to defend a coward who shows up on a thread only to post that O'Donnell has "baggage", as if it's breaking news. Or perhaps you agree with mwl8787 who believes that that comment was "insightful and valuable"?
Go back to sleep.