Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Fine by me, but I'm also of the opinion we should just write this one off and focus on other races. She does have the unfortunate effect of pulling down our ticket elsewhere as long as she stays in the news. And I'd rather not lose McMahon or Angle as well because they get unwillingly grouped with her.

The left is already trying to pile O'Donnell's baggage onto Angle because they both attended events at the Claremont Institute, both are perceived as Tea Party women etc., even though Angle has nothing to do with O'Donnell. Propping her up and pretending there's nothing wrong with her only makes the left's case easier for them, and we lose 3 races instead of just 1.

48 posted on 10/13/2010 8:10:05 PM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: conimbricenses

It’s worse than that. O’Donnell will be a black eye for the tea party. But look on the bright side. Our populace is so stupid in 6 months they won’t even remember Christine O’Donnell. Then again, from what I can tell, COD will find a way to stay in front of the camera==her favorite place to be. Maybe she can become a FOX analyst.


50 posted on 10/13/2010 8:12:11 PM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson