To: ChrisBoundsTX
What do you expect from a group that abandoned its feminist principles and whored itself out as a wing of the Dem party years ago?
To: ChrisBoundsTX
Sweet. Now it is OK to call Democrat chicks “whores” too.
3 posted on
10/11/2010 6:00:45 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
The Nasty Old Witches would endorse a serial rapist over a Republican as long as he voted Democrat and supported Federally-funded abortion.
4 posted on
10/11/2010 6:01:08 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
NOW is just another rat nest hole
5 posted on
10/11/2010 6:05:20 AM PDT by
Doogle
(IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN....PLEASE donate, because it's the RIGHT thing to do)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
they also endorsed Grayson who spouted off about the “K Street whore” who ticked him off
Evidently “whore” is acceptable when used by “manly” men who back govt-paid abortion
6 posted on
10/11/2010 6:08:46 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(The lesser of two evils is still evil.)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
National Organization for Women Whores
7 posted on
10/11/2010 6:13:05 AM PDT by
Jaxter
("Pro Aris et Focis")
To: ChrisBoundsTX
By the way, that sounded like Jerry Brown’s voice that said the word whore, on that recording to me. IMO
8 posted on
10/11/2010 6:22:37 AM PDT by
Racer1
To: ChrisBoundsTX
N.O.W. does not support “whores”.... they only support Marxist tyrants.
To: ChrisBoundsTX
now is a division of hell inc. and lesbians for satan... they endorse evil wherever it rears its head.
LLS
To: ChrisBoundsTX
Wonder what Brown’s girl friend thinks of it?.
13 posted on
10/11/2010 6:40:52 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: ChrisBoundsTX
If NOW ever had any integrity, it's been a long time, so it doesn't surprise me.
14 posted on
10/11/2010 6:41:12 AM PDT by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
“NOW Endorses Brown Within Hours Of Whore Audio”
Well, at least we know what it takes to get NOW’s endorsement. Just be a male candidate that calls your female opponent a whore and you’re guaranteed NOW’s immediate endorsement. Works for me.
15 posted on
10/11/2010 6:43:03 AM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Made from The Right Stuff!)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
NOW has embarrassed itself many times ... what’s one more?
To: ChrisBoundsTX
NOW has shown its true colors, and they are anti-woman and pro-marxist.
To: ChrisBoundsTX
Totally understandable, old chap: they heard “whore,” their ears perked up, and they did what they always do, endorse the RAT.
18 posted on
10/11/2010 6:55:16 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("It's amazing, A man who has such large ears could be so tone deaf" Rush Limbaugh 9/8/10)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
I would not have expected anything different from them. They’re not for WOMEN, they’re for LIBERALISM.
21 posted on
10/11/2010 7:19:26 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: ChrisBoundsTX
I doubt a NOW endorsement holds any sway. Those who would be impacted by it are already flaming libtards and would have voted for Brown anyway.
24 posted on
10/11/2010 7:28:41 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...
Thanks ChrisBoundsTX.
The standards for an endorsement at the National Organization for Women must be pretty low.
26 posted on
10/11/2010 7:40:43 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: ChrisBoundsTX
We can’t make this stuff up!
To: ChrisBoundsTX
NOW would’ve endorced if Whitman whined about the whore comment more. That’s what they’re looking for.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson