Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Richard Curtis's snuff movie: A satire? A canny marketing strategy? (Eco-Fascists)
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | October 2, 2010 | James Delingpole

Posted on 10/04/2010 9:29:01 AM PDT by CedarDave

Richard Curtis’s eco-fascist snuff movie was a disaster for the green movement, I think we can all agree.

Well, not quite all of us to judge by one or two bizarre comments and newspaper responses I’ve seen today. Let’s just dispense with a few of them.

1. It was an internet “hit.” (~~snip~~)

2. It was all part of Richard Curtis’s “cunning plan”. (~~snip~~)

3. Richard Curtis is a secret “denier” and devised the project as satire.(~~snip~~)

4. This was an unfortunate accident. It isn’t representative of the green movement.(~~snip~~)

5. It’s actually “funny” and people who don’t think so haven’t got a sense of humour.

Hmm. Let’s see what “Thegavster” has to say about this on the previous post. I think he makes the point rather well:

So the killing of people who do not subscribe to the 10:10 campaign is “funny”. It’s “funny” to kill children in a classroom? Its “funny” to kill people who have a different opinion? What sort of people find that funny? If the people who pressed the button were dressed in Nazi uniforms, would it still be “funny”? Would those who made this video and who find this “funny” still find it “funny” if a similar video was produced showing supporters of the campaign being blown up? Would the video still be “funny” if it was made by animal rights activists and showed children and others being blown up because they didn’t support animal rights campaigns? Would a similar video be “funny” if made by Islamic extremists and showed non-Muslim children being blown up? Would it still be “funny” if the video showed Muslim children being blown up by that crazy Pastor in the US who wanted to burn Korans?


(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science
KEYWORDS: 1010; carbonemissions; ecofascists; nopressure
The video has gone viral. Be warned, it's graphic.

Here are some other blog links from the Telegraph:

Pachauri's strategy: terrorize the children

Splattergate: 'Oh well, we live and learn….'

Eco-fascism jumps the shark: massive, epic fail!

'Go green or we'll kill your kids' says Richard Curtis eco-propaganda shocker

1 posted on 10/04/2010 9:29:08 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Full title of the article (to long for FR):

Richard Curtis's snuff movie: A satire? A canny marketing strategy? I don't think so

2 posted on 10/04/2010 9:30:59 AM PDT by CedarDave (Ten-year anniversary - proudly Freeping since Aug 17, 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“Would a similar video be “funny” if made by Islamic extremists and showed non-Muslim children being blown up?”

I think I’ve seen that video.


3 posted on 10/04/2010 9:56:01 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Aren’t these the same folks that say it’s not funny to have animals be harmed in movies?

Circus animals not cute but tortured?


4 posted on 10/04/2010 10:14:54 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Richard Curtis produced such popular fare as the Blackadder and Mr. Bean series, as well as films such as Four Weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill, Bridget Jones's Diary and Love, Actually.

He is one more limousine liberal who owns a home in Notting Hill as well as two, count 'em, two country homes in Walberswick, Suffolk and Henley, Oxfordshire.

He is a swine.

5 posted on 10/04/2010 10:53:54 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Buy Gold and Guns Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I didn’t think it was funny. I thought it showed the typical response of an extremist religious cult, blowing up those who disagree with them.

It’s what you do if you don’t have any convincing arguments, or if you are a false religion.


6 posted on 10/04/2010 2:15:38 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

However, I did think the ending was funny — because in the end, they will turn on their own, as they all try to outdo each other for the eco-freak award.

No doubt, at some point they will blow up Al Gore’s house.


7 posted on 10/04/2010 2:16:42 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
There must be a for-credit class somewhere, Non-Apologic Apologies For Left Wankers Whingers Wingers, that they are all required to take.

“STATEMENT BY EUGENICA EUGENIE HARVEY, DIRECTOR OF 10:10 UK

“Last week, 10:10 made available a short film. Following the initial reaction to the film we removed it from our website and issued an apology on Friday 2 October.

“Subsequently there has been negative comment about the film, particularly on blogs, and concern from others working hard to build support for action on climate change. We are very sorry if this has distracted from their efforts.

“We are also sorry to our corporate sponsors, delivery partners and board members, who have been implicated in this situation despite having no involvement in the film’s production or release.

“We will learn from this mistake. Today I have written to supporters and stakeholders explaining that we will review processes and procedures to make sure it cannot happen again. Responsibility for this process is being taken by the 10:10 board.

“The media coverage of the film was not the kind of publicity we wanted for 10:10, nor for the wider movement to reduce carbon emissions.

” If people have been in touch with us personally about the film, we will be replying to individual emails over the next few days. Meanwhile our thanks go out to all those who support 10:10 and who work to combat the threat of climate change.”

8 posted on 10/04/2010 7:09:26 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson