[STARWISE]

"By the lower Courts finding that plaintiffs do not have standing and that their claims present a political question, the lower Courts were able to avoid having to address the underlying merits of the Kerchner case. With such a decision, the American People unfortunately still do not know conclusively where Obama was born and whether he is an Article II “natural born Citizen” and therefore constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.

Being a born “Citizen of the United States” is a necessary part but is NOT sufficient to be an Article II “natural born Citizen of the United States”. We have asked the relevant questions and provided for the U.S. Supreme Court in our Petition various reasons why it should accept this case and promptly resolves this constitutional crisis."

~~~~~~~~

Keep going, Mario.

[STARWISE]

..Ping!

[butterdezillion]

I’m not as up on all the court cases as I should be, but isn’t this the case where they are suing Pelosi, Cheney, etc because they didn’t verify Obama’s eligibility?

If so, then how can they dismiss it as a “political question”, when the point being raised is that the people who were supposed to do the job failed to do it?

Does the public have no right to sue the government for failing to do what the law requires? Or are they just saying the only person who would have standing to sue would be John McCain? Wouldn’t it be a hoot if Sarah Palin sued and broke the whole thing open?

[MIchaelTArchangel]

If Barark is found not to be eligible to serve as President, the Congress will be forced to chose from among the other eligibles who did not receive a majority of votes in the electoral college—that candidates are John McCain.

[MIchaelTArchangel]

If Barark is found not to be eligible to serve as President, the House will be forced to chose from among the other eligibles who did not receive a majority of votes in the electoral college—that candidates are John McCain.

[so_real]

Obama was born a British Subject/Citizen to a British Subject/Citizen father and a U.S. citizen mother. Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen and never intended to be one. Obama's father was never even an immigrant to the USA nor was he even a permanent legal resident.

It is just that simple. You can not be a natural born citizen if your parent or parents were un-naturalized subjects of a foreign power. "Pure allegiance" to our nation is paramount to the office executing laws over it. It isn't "pure" when only one parent complies. That is "tainted" allegiance at best. The sheer fact that so many don't understand this speaks so very poorly about a our education system.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

Good to see the effort continued on Obama Eligibility. Hopefully a real hearing will be held based on this issue

It is sad that we have phony conservatives attacking Birthers and supporting Obama. Many of these people had no problem when Clinton’s girlfriends kept their stained dresses....yet they have been supporting Obama on his eligibility issue.

We need people to stop bragging about “we got Clinton’s law license revoked”...and step up and support those challenging Obama’s eligibility.

[Michael Barnes]

SCOTUS doesn't want to touch this one any further than they could throw it.

Which is odd since if SCOTUS wanted to re-gain some honor, they would hear all the facts and rid themselves of two dis-honorable justices in the process.