Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
SCOTUS doesn't want to touch this one any further than they could throw it.

Which is odd since if SCOTUS wanted to re-gain some honor, they would hear all the facts and rid themselves of two dis-honorable justices in the process.

17 posted on 10/01/2010 12:37:57 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Guilty of being White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Michael Barnes

Four conservative justices and one now-retired liberal justice have all done some bizarre things in association with Obama’s presidency, as if they were dragged along against their will.

So have a number of judges in the eligibility cases - ethics violations which they had to know would be obvious and could actually get them disbarred.

As has Dick Cheney.

I think there’s more to this story than meets the eye.


20 posted on 10/01/2010 12:49:54 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Barnes

I think the answer to your query is the photo(on FR) of Obama comfortably being palsy-walsy with SC justices in Robert’s chambers. I think this was before the election and when there were legal cases against Obama which might have come before the SCOTUSA. Hearing now of Robert’s oil investments makes me wonder.


154 posted on 10/05/2010 10:33:51 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson