Skip to comments.
Race now required for mortgage modification?
Founding Ideals ^
| September 13, 2010
Posted on 09/13/2010 7:32:52 PM PDT by agee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/13/2010 7:32:56 PM PDT
by
agee
To: agee
2
posted on
09/13/2010 7:34:35 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(The TOTUS-Reader: omnipotence at home, impotence abroad (Weekly Standard))
To: agee
We need an equal protection clause in the Constitution or its amendments. Oh wait . . .
3
posted on
09/13/2010 7:35:10 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Even the earth is bipolar.)
To: agee
This reminds me of the forms we have to fill out for the kids at school. They say we HAVE to tell the kids’ race. Why should it even matter?
To: agee
I imagine most of them are done over the phone.
Would it be wise to talk in Ebonics?
5
posted on
09/13/2010 7:36:26 PM PDT
by
earlJam
To: agee
fill out mixed. like our president was supposed to do. Besides we all have mixtures from way back when.
6
posted on
09/13/2010 7:37:07 PM PDT
by
hecht
(TAKE BACK OUR NATION AND OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM)
To: agee
If it turns out
a higher percentage of blacks get help than whites - can we assume racial bias? And can we assume the MSM won't give an eff?
7
posted on
09/13/2010 7:40:23 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/09/the_power_of_images_turned_aga.html)
To: agee
The only reason the government can possibly have for wanting to know the color of your skin is so that it can discriminate on the basis of the color of your skin.
8
posted on
09/13/2010 7:43:30 PM PDT
by
Guyin4Os
(A messianic ger-tsedek)
To: hecht
I am certainly mixed - Irish, Scotts, German, a couple of vikings, who knows what else... might be a polar bear in there somewhere...
9
posted on
09/13/2010 7:43:42 PM PDT
by
patton
(Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
To: agee
That seems to be pretty standard throughout the gubermint and was in effect far before the current _resident moved in.
10
posted on
09/13/2010 7:44:42 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("It's amazing, A man who has such large ears could be so tone deaf" Rush Limbaugh 9/8/10)
To: agee
Instead of posting excerpts from the
National Review article so that your blog would get web click credits, far better would it have been for you to post the
National Review article excerpts here, and then add your few comments.
Always give full credit in the proper thread spaces to the source of the original article, in this case, National Review. Always give proper attribution to original writers which in this case was Matthew Shaffer who wrote Racial Voyeurism on September 9, 2010 for National Review.
Thanks.
To: agee
The latest fiasco is the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) which requires lenders to identify the race of the applicant even if the applicant refuses to provide the information This is nothing new. When we applied for a mortgage years ago, we were asked how we wanted to identify our race. I told the mortgage people we would not answer the question. They then told us that if we chose not to answer, they were required to do so on our behalf.
To: patton
I am certainly mixed - Irish, Scotts, German, a couple of vikings, who knows what else... might be a polar bear in there somewhere...Nevertheless, change your name to Rastus Leroy Jefferson, speak in Ebonics, wear hip-hop clothing, flash some gang signs, and tell them to guess yo' race.
To: behzinlea
No. Nein. Here in Bayern, gibt’s kein Rascenhass, Du Saupreuss, Du.
(In Bavaria, we have no racial hate - you stupid pig Prussian.)
14
posted on
09/13/2010 7:57:02 PM PDT
by
patton
(Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
To: freedumb2003
>Not satire...?
Sadly, no
15
posted on
09/13/2010 7:57:04 PM PDT
by
agee
To: agee
The government fully intends to provide the data to third party community groups, on which banks are making “enough” loans to certain demographics and then let those local thugs extort the banks with the help of the local media.
16
posted on
09/13/2010 7:59:20 PM PDT
by
RachelFaith
(2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
To: freespirited
That would have been in direct contradiction of the published HUD documents at the time. The preference was to ALWAYS have race/ethnicity self identified.
17
posted on
09/13/2010 7:59:35 PM PDT
by
agee
To: freedumb2003
18
posted on
09/13/2010 8:00:49 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
To: agee
That’s been done at loan application for probably 30 years. The modification part would already have that info.
19
posted on
09/13/2010 8:01:39 PM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I aspire to a large carbon footprint; just like Al Gore's)
To: Guyin4Os
It is called reparations.
20
posted on
09/13/2010 8:01:41 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson