They loved trees.
Posted on 09/06/2010 10:29:52 AM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman
In a week when Jews will celebrate Rosh Hashanah, the New Year—5771, the connection between the Nazi’s rebellion against the Judeo-Christian worldview and the present-day ideology that drives the environmental movement needs to be exposed.
Anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and elsewhere around the world, driven in part by the Islamic hatred of Jews, but also reflected in the liberal antipathy to corporations and the financial community, often portrayed as “Jewish bankers”, as history’s favorite scapegoat for economic problems. The situation mirrors Germany in the 1930s.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
It’s been said on here that the Obama presidency was like going back to the 70’s but more and more it seems to me to be a reliving of the 30’s. Scary.
Jews and Christians can stand up to the Godless haters - together...
“a reliving of the 30’s. Scary.”
Just remember that there was no “Second Amendment” in the constitutions of Poland, Hungary, Austria, France,etc. When the Nazis come around this time, we’ll be ready......
The Greens have been internationalized since World War II, and so now they are figthing against the international free market, i.e., world trade, while we conservatives become concerned about an international socialism suffocating our own society from the opposite direction, and the green movement has played a critical role in this whole process. Too many people are naive about the green movement. Even George Will said yesterday in his latest article that the greens used to be like bambi before they become infected with progressive big government ideas - http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2010/09/05/the_environmental_movement_in_retreat_241082.html This is simply untrue.
I hear you, but that will be a tall order indeed.
Nanny State = Nazi State
They loved trees.
the nazis loved trees so much the wehrmacht could not effectivelt train in forest fighting. they had to OJT it in the proppet marshes in russia.
To an extant that is true, but keep in mind that the Nazis called Germany the “Fatherland.” Their enviromentalism was therefore a chauvinistic green Jack London style - Social Darwinism and the Call of the Wild.
What is your source on that? I would be very interested in that. I do know that Nazi public works program which had been salivating at draining the Pripit Marshes for over a decade in the 1930’s to help turn it into arable farming land(which lets you know how long the Nazis were planning their eastward expansion), was denied by the Nazi heirarchy in 1941. About this particular time, Hitler was more concerned that the Ukraine would turn into an American Dust Bowl if this were to be done.
These particular trees were located near Brandenberg, just east of Berlin. They were cut down after the fall of the Soviet Union. Few were concerned about the environmental fascim that those trees represented when they were cut down.
The trees were under commie control for over 45 years, I can only assume they were unaware the swastika was there; otherwise they would have been cut down long before Dec. 2000.
While I don’t doubt for a minute that leftist fascism is promoting hatred of Jews and Christians, it seems that the new Jews to our new Nazis are fat people. This may just be a flash in the lard pan, an entertaining intermission before the demonic minions blitzkrieg Israel and the Church, but fat people should definitely beware of leftnuts displaying signs of liberal illness.
The trees are larch trees, which are coniferous trees, but they turn golden in the fall and lose their needles. In other words, the only time you see them is in the fall. Nonetheless, they were very visible from the air during that time of the year. Why the Soviets did not cut the trees down earlier is of course an interesting question. Western Germans were far more concerned about it than the Soviets. Why? Because it reveals western environmental fascism.
Funny thing is, the characteristic of Americans which (along with what was even in the 1930's a racially mixed society) made the Nazis confident that we'd fold up like a cheap suit was our unwillingness to march in step like good little automatons. Governing Americans is and should be akin to herding cats. And around 100 million of those cats possess a couple hundred million modern firearms. That makes the work of our new Commissars / SS a little more tricky than what their predecessors had to deal with.
Anyone interested in the “blood and soil” theories of Richard Walther Darré who is often called the founder of the green movement:
http://ftrsupplemental.blogspot.com/2008/03/blood-and-soil-as-official-doctrine.html
Blood and soil was an SS doctrine. Darre was Himmler’s mentor in the early 20’s as they were both involved in a green German youth movement that its roots in the pantheistic ecology of Ernst Haeckel called Monism (which today is known as Social Darwinism). Later, Himmler became Darre’s senior in the SS. Himmler himself came out of the backwoods countryside of Bavaria. Hitler was not a blood and soil ideolgue like Himmler and Darre, but he did talk about it and use it on occasion. Goebbels, however, apparently hated the doctrine, though he was still a vegetarian.
German blood and soil was an eugenic environmentalism (Social Darwinian ecology) that stood in stark contrast to ancient Israel who were of the blood of Abraham dwelling in the promised land. As such, some Germans tried to herald Germany as a modern promised land for greens where racism and environmentalism would help cleanse the landscape of its corrupt internationalism propagated largely by the Judeo-Christian worldview.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.