Posted on 09/05/2010 7:41:12 AM PDT by jim byrd
If you are, as I am, a perusing cogitator of the Democratic Party's purveying of balderdash, then you most certainly have been left scratching your head in a state of bewilderment as to how a brain, or collective brains, larger than a walnut, could produce such poppycock outside an asylum for the maniacal. It's as if the entire collective Democratic Party and our dear President Obama have gnawed their way out of restraints, moved to Washington, DC, and set up shop. At last, relief appears to be cresting the horizon. All in possession of gumption, intelligence, and old fashioned horse-sense may soon be able to cease head scratching, enjoy respite from hazes of bafflement, and rejuvenate from the cessation of perpetual insomnia from attempting to break the invincible code of ignorance that shrouds Barack Obama and the Democratic Party like a a titanium cocoon
(Excerpt) Read more at jimbyrd.com ...
I don’t think he’s insane. The insane people are the ones who elected him thinking he would be good for the country.
I liken Obama and the democrats as our Bin-Laden and Al-Qaeda.
They respectively believe that their ideologies are the correct vision to guide the world.
Yet, under close scrutiny, one can only conclude that their ideologies are illogical and sheer madness and the products of simple-mindedness.
I’ve read that French intelligence briefed Sarkozy that obama is insane (at least, mentally ill or unstable). It’s possible other foreign powers believe the same. Some with alarm, others with glee.
I don’t think he is insane either. He is just a nobody w/ pie/sky eyes and a severe case of opticus rectosis. He is in over his head, and we all know where his head is.
He is a bewildered, smartass little boy. He routinely places his hands over his ears (a trick in itself, since his ears are so big and it involves putting his hands in where his head is), and dances around in his own little circle, singing “la-la-la-la” like a little kid who is trying not to listen to reason.
His ascendancy says way more about America in the present era than it does about this stupid lost soul. His meteoric descent of late may signal thatour fair land is returning to some semblance of sensibility. I hope so.
One other thing: inasmuch as liberalism is a mental disorder, he is insane — but no more so than any liberal.
He may not be insane, but he is a malignant narcissist and arrogant Stalinist thug whose sole purpose in life is to destroy this country.
.
The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.
The Obama File
http://www.theobamafile.com/index.htm
.
No he is not insane. He is doing exactly what he said he would do. Destroy and dismantle!
Obama gives many indications of being a megalomaniac.
Megalomaniacs are, by definition, maniacs.
Maniacs are, by definition, insane.
Therefore, Obama is insane.
A Shrink Asks: What’s Wrong with Obama?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/a_shrink_asks_whats_wrong_with.html
I don’t know if Obama is insane, but those who voted for him certainly are.
I bet he’s driven by the whole Affirmative Action over Substance that many blacks suffer. Add to that an infusion of anger over pre-1865 America, and the arrogance of Islam when dealing with the dhimmis, and I think there is can of mixed nuts in the WH.
Most of us would not imagine any correspondence between conceiving an ethnic genocide and, say, guiltlessly lying to one’s boss about a coworker. But the psychological correspondence is not only there; it is chilling. Simple and profound, the link is the absence of the inner mechanism that beats up on us, emotionally speaking, when we make a choice we view as immoral, unethical, neglectful, or selfish.
Most of us feel mildly guilty if we eat the last piece of cake in the kitchen, let alone what we would feel if we intentionally and methodically set about to hurt another person.
Those who have no conscience at all are a group unto themselves, whether they be homicidal tyrants or merely ruthless social snipers.
The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or even gender.
What differentiates a sociopath who lives off the labors of others from one who occasionally robs convenience stores, or from one who is a contemporary robber baron - or what makes the difference betwen an ordinary bully and a sociopathic murderer - is nothing more than social status, drive, intellect, blood lust, or simple opportunity.
What distinguishes all of these people from the rest of us is an utterly empty hole in the psyche, where there should be the most evolved of all humanizing functions. [Martha Stout, Ph.D., The Sociopath Next Door] (highly recommended)
I concur 100%. Below is a previous post I made on the subject:
1. Those who were bedazzled by his campaign’s brilliant marketing and/or McCain’s incompetence as a candidate. Mostly independents fall into this category.
2. Those caught up in the novelty of electing the nation’s first Black President. Almost all white liberals fall into this category.
3. Those (typically minorities) who saw Obama’s election as a way to “get theirs”
I think Obama’s governing has stripped away many in category #1 and some in category #2. Those in category #3, while parasites, were at least being honest with themselves. I am convinced that Obama has been groomed, maybe since his early years, to play a major role in Government. No doubt that his handlers succeeded beyond their wildest dreams by getting him elected POTUS. Anyone who thought this guy could actually “reach across the aisle and solve problems” was delusional. The man literally went from State Rep to POTUS in four years—with two of those years spent campaigning. His govening experience was paper thin. Worst of all, there was very little focus on his associates, most of whom were Socialsts and Marxists. McCain should have made a huge issue of this, but chose to take the “high road” and lose. As a result, America lost.
I still think that the 2012 Presidential election will be a very close one. That is because most modern Americans would rather be clients than producers. 50+ years of liberal indoctrination has paid off big time. The only way Obama can lose if he continues to overreach—which he well might.
Are they insane? I’ll go for mostly power-hungry and not too bright. For decades Dems have gotten away with telling the most well-off people on the planet that they are poor victims of rapacious capitalists who want to kill them. Yes, that is basically been the message of the Dems. Secretly they believe that most Americans are too stupid to run their own lives. Combined with the sense of their own mental and moral superiority (and a big lust for unbridled power over others) the Dems have been successful. Maybe their luck has finally run out.
That’s why he’s called Be Wacky Insane~0
Comments like "posting his birth certificate on his forhead" is way out of the norm...
saying his girls have to get babysitting jobs so they can buy things....is way out of the norm....
avoiding any "free press" events...
This man is a puppet....and the strings are all tangled...and those strings are controlled by his brain.
Millions of Dem loyalists made a huge mistake and they're eating it!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.