Posted on 08/31/2010 10:45:09 AM PDT by combat_boots
FreeVoiceOfAus said... Pam, Great work calling out that guy at 7 min in, when you mentioned you're anti-jihad not Islam, the fact he seems to think attacking one is attacking the other is quite telling
I also noticed the same old kitman seems to be pushed over and over, "we oppose terrorism" and "he opposes the terrorist actions of Hamas" both of which can be interpreted differently since "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". Their definition of terrorism might be the act of killing "innocents" but what's an innocent, according to Jihadists, it means Muslims anyone else doesn't count, so terrorism in their definition could be Israel or America defending themselves, heck half the Ron Pauler's spout that why not the Jihadists. As for the "terrorist actions of Hamas", that could be a reference to when they kill "innocents" aka Sunnis or fellow Shiites as opposed to Israeli's, Christians, Jews and maybe even Muslims who get in their way (hence considered Kafir), all of whom would not be counted as innocents hence not protected. But the leftist dhimmi's eat it none the less
(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...
Way to go Pamela Geller
The “priestess” is a Commie apologist for jihad and one smarmy leftist looking down her nose on everyone. Bob Beckel was abominable as he always is — but Pam Geller slammed the all down. I love when she told Beckel that she is anti-jihad not anti-Islamist and if he can’t tell the difference, then he’s in some kind of trouble. And, of course, he can’t tell the difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.