Posted on 08/28/2010 5:26:03 PM PDT by Mozilla
THE DATE FOR THE RALLY IN WASHINGTON, D.C. HAS BEEN SET
For Immediate Release: 08/28/2010
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Obamas lack of qualifications to serve as President of the United States stated that WE THE PEOPLE by and through Philip J. Berg and Obamacrimes.com is sponsoring the OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE / ELIGIBILITY/ OBAMACARE Rally in Washington on Saturday, October 23, 2010 12 Noon to 4:00 p.m. at U.S. Capitol West Front.
The OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE / ELIGIBILITY/ OBAMACARE Rally in Washington, D.C. is for the purpose of exposing Soetoro/Obama and demanding that he proves that he is Constitutionally eligible to be President, or for the benefit of the 308 million citizens of the United States, to resign from office.
All individuals participating are requested to bring a copy of their Birth Certificate.
The crucial issues regarding Obama, the IMPOSTER, continue to grow. However, the most important issue is Obama not being Constitutionally eligible to be President: 1) not being natural born being born in Mombasa, Kenya; and 2) even more important the fact that Obama was adopted or legally acknowledged by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, and his school record in Indonesia indicates the Imposters name is Barry Soetoro, his nationality being Indonesia and his religion being Islam. Obama, the Imposters legal name is Barry Soetoro. Obama must be stopped ! WE THE PEOPLE can, by way of the largest rally ever in Washington, DC, have a Peaceful Revolution and force Obama to prove he is Constitutionally eligible or resign from office. YES WE CAN !
The cost of the Rally in Washington is expensive. We must raise Fifty Thousand [$50,000.00] Dollars to cover the cost of the Rally including advertising this important event.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacrimes.com ...
I would rather have an elected Republican majority House bring it up on the House floor.
When they start the impeachment hearings.
This aint going to cut it. Wait until after the election.
Don't forget: Obama cannot be natural born having been born, by his own admission, “a subject of the British Commonwealth” because his father was a British subject, and because of the British Nationality Act of 1948. Our framers were crystal clear about requiring a natural born citizen. Four Chief Justices and dozens of Supreme Court cases cite the definition. Our framers used a very old notion, the notion that the child inherits the allegiances of the parent. Obama only proves their correctness.
Have a rally to explain our history. Berg is a faithful Democrat operative, out to keep the focus on birth certificates, just has our only other ineligible president, Chester Arthur, took advantage of, if he didn't cooperated with, a journalist, Hinman, who wrote a book insisting that Arthur was born in Canada. Arthur, just like Obama, hid his birth certificate. He was born in New Hampshire. Like Obama, Chester's father was not naturalized when Chester was born; he was a British subject (Irish). Obama’s father was never naturalized and never had allegiance for our Constitution, just like his son.
Don't forget: Obama cannot be natural born having been born, by his own admission, “a subject of the British Commonwealth” because his father was a British subject, and because of the British Nationality Act of 1948. Our framers were crystal clear about requiring a natural born citizen. Four Chief Justices and dozens of Supreme Court cases cite the definition. Our framers used a very old notion, the notion that the child inherits the allegiances of the parent. Obama only proves their correctness.
Have a rally to explain our history. Berg is a faithful Democrat operative, out to keep the focus on birth certificates, just has our only other ineligible president, Chester Arthur, took advantage of, if he didn't cooperated with, a journalist, Hinman, who wrote a book insisting that Arthur was born in Canada. Arthur, just like Obama, hid his birth certificate. He was born in New Hampshire. Like Obama, Chester's father was not naturalized when Chester was born; he was a British subject (Irish). Obama’s father was never naturalized and never had allegiance for our Constitution, just like his son.
The witnesses against him are from his own family.
Here is some more information and links
Hmm…An AP story from 2004 entitled Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate has been discovered on archive.org by many sites (and twitter where I got this). Does this mean now that the AP is nothing but a bunch of birthers?
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations. ...
See the whole Obama 1964 divorce on Scribd.com or as 13 individual images below (in proper order):
I immediately called the clerk in Hawaii and asked where the extra page was. She looked, and counted, and said that there must be some mistake in the records she counted only 13 pages that are available for reprint. I pointed out to her that the page count she sent skipped from page 10 to page 12 page 11 was missing. To that, she suggested that perhaps the pages were simply misnumbered before they where archived into the microfiche.
I accepted her answer, not thinking much about it at the time. Perhaps it was just a clerical error in the 1960s, when hand-filed paper records and IBM punch cards were how court documents were tracked and maintained.
I have since come to learn that Obama and his team of lawyers have been working to sanitize his records since he announced that he’d run for President circa November 2004. Now in the White House, hes still ACTIVELY blocking subpoenas for such documents as his Cambridge and Occidental College records TODAY the same type of documents promised to be made available during his campaign. Obama and his lawyers are exceedingly adept at exploiting loopholes in Hawaiian birth certificate law to keep Obamas past hidden from the American people.
This missing page page 11 very likely is a copy of the original birth certificate, based upon the prima facie timeline of the 1964 divorce. The Kenya birth certificate was likely requested on Jan 23, 1964 by either Judge King (to award custody on the next trial date), or recommended to Ann Dunham by her attorney for the ex parte divorce, where only one parent was expected to be present.
The missing page, 11, should be chronologically-numbered as all other pages were in the original docket file, by the court clerk at the time. Starting at page 8, Exhibit A is placed where it would have occurred by date in the paperwork (and appeared on microfiche), even denoting an erased, yet barely-readable “8″ on both pages of the returned notification sent to Obama SR. The missing page, numbered as page 11, would likely be a page that would have been admitted to the divorce file sometime in mid- to late-February 1964 almost as if it were an undocumented Exhibit B.
Heres a very plausible timeline merging the 1964 Obama Divorce papers and new Kenya birth certificate:
Jan 20 (Mon) divorce request is filed by Stanley Ann D. Obama
Jan 23 (Thur) divorce orders for trial are given by Judge King at chambers
In Hawaii, birth certificates are not Public Record. If the Kenya birth certificate was a part of the divorce decree, it may have been pulled out at the end of the trial, or more recently by a watchful archivist or attorneys wishing to remove unfavorable information about Obama.
To date, despite other honest attempts to refute the Kenya birth certificate, such as dealing with when the Republic of Kenya came into existence as a republic have been un-bunked. Dishonest alterations of the Kenya birth certificate have been maliciously created by sites such as Democratic Underground, designed to discredit the Kenya birth certificate theyve been un-bunked as well.
Having not actually seeing the Kenya birth certificate, and its chain of evidence, no intellectually-honest person can say if its real or not. By the same token, none of us have seen or touched the short-form Certification of Live Birth that has appeared on Obamas Fight the Smears or FactCheck.org websites.
No one can confirm the chain of evidence of Obamas Certification of Live Birth that has appeared online, which is the abbreviated-version of Obamas true, 1961, original long-form(s) Certificate of Live Birth and associated vital statistics records. Even the Hawaii Department of Health directly refuses to verify Obamas online COLBs.
The Eighth Witness, Lucas Daniel Smith,
Case CLOSED!!!
.
It’s all pretty simple, really =
It’s now time to do to the Democrats on Healthcare...
...just what the Democrats did to Vietnam =
Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education Camp
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts
.
CUT THE FUNDING...!!!
.
Ditto squared.
This issue does not help the Demorats not one bit in any election. It is a drag on them. It’s the fools here and trolls who think that this helps them. They are still going to lose Congress and probably more than 100 seats both Houses combined.
“Yes, Phil Berg is a Hillary Democrat. But, that won’t be mentioned in the news coverage. What you can expect is that protesters will be outnumbered by reporters and cameramen, who will be jostling to find the looniest people and capture the most outrageous quotes.”
The media has all the power. Participants will ALL be labeled Beck 9/12ers or Tea Partiers.
Well, for us it is case closed. But you’re preaching to the choir and no amount of evidence, new or old, is going to make a difference to non-birthers. Just sayin.
The TRUTH is NEVER a bad idea. Get the truth into the history books if he can't be impeached.
This should be done AFTER the November elections IF AT ALL. It seems no court in the land is willing to take on this issue. Do I think Obama is a fraud? YES! Isn’t it more important to win back the House and Senate and put the country on the road to an ACTUAL recovery. We need to stop the bleed and take back our country.
Adding my two cents...I agree this is a bad idea!
Someone on YouTube sent me a private message with a link to this video....first I’ve seen or heard of it and I didn’t do any checking into the source other than to read Brent Bateman’s bio on the site. FYI to anyone else who might be interested:
FRAUD
http://www.quadcitypictures.com/
“Take a sneak peak at the film that will destroy the criminal Obama Cult. In Our Citizens We Trust. The whole world will be talking about the FRAUD. IN THEATERS SOON.
“While the treasonous United States media continues their membership in the criminal Obama cult, this film sheds light on the multiple felony crimes and treason committed by illegal U.S. President Barry Soetoro. The whole world will be talking about the FRAUD.”
The American public is stupid. Palin with restore honor while she campaigned for Obamas side kick McCain. Glen Beck is an anti-borther and a friend of OReillys at Fox/Saudia and people think he is a conservative.
Most of your points make sense Frantzie, except the comment about Beck. If this thread is any indication, Beck realizes that few have the focus, time, or interest in reading the constitution. This is a Constitutional issue and no one on this thread, granted that it is a “support Berg” thread, appears to understand, or to want to address the facts. Assuming that the public remains ignorant, and Obama keeps hiding documents, manufactured or not, which show that he was born in Hawaii, this is a losing battle for Beck or Levin or Limbaugh. Beck, at least, is keeping an audience by talking about founders and framers, even if he avoids the founders and framers whose involvement with and use of the natural born citizen provision might expose his evasion, Jay, Jefferson, Story, Wilson, Ramsay, Marshall, Waite, and Bingham (included as a framer since he wrote the original 14th amendment draft).
It is simply a fact that Alwaleed bin Talal is News Corp’s largest stockholder. Of course, if we don't protect the Saudi's he won't last long, so its not possible to know the extent of his editorial control. But this may be a country incapable of making the connections which finds it easier to discuss current rumors than to learn about our foundation. There are certainly Free Republic writers who understand. It may be that those who understand don't bother with anything that mentions Berg. It could even be, as I've seen on some threads, that most respondents who understand stay away, since absence of reason means these people mean to distract.
Birth to a foreign father made Obama ineligible. Discovery of a valid Hawaiin long form birth certificate doesn't make Obama a natural born citizen. Lack of a birth certificate might show that Obama is not even a citizen. He wasn't challenged because McCain too was ineligible. It was a clever political trap, and McCain was probably an active participant. The Tea Party people I've spoken with have no doubt that Obama is illegitimate because he is a born British subject. A Berg rally of any sort will simply be dismissed, as it probably should be. the people on this list who aren't obama supporters would to well to read the Constitution and at least one case: pick The Venus, Minor v. Happesett, Perkin v. Elg, Wong Kim Ark noting that Wong Kim was born on our soil and not made a natural born citizen, even Dred Scott got natural born citizenship right.
I’ve seen all of this before, but thank you for reposting. My hope is that this event is held after the Nov elections so that our candidates - in every state - do not have to comment on this controversial topic. You may not think it is controversial and I won’t make a guess on the truth, but the timing sucks.
Don’t put undue stress on our candidates as we approach this very important election. The country is hanging by a thread economically and we have an opportunity to change the course of an almost certain depression.
Obama is being outed day by day, why blow our opportunity to put an end to his congressional foul play?
Fine, do it after Nov 2.
Two wrongs do not make it right. Disregarding the social contract of the Constitution for the sake of being elected into power under false pretenses does nothing whatsoever to inspire confidence in the integrity and trustworthiness of the GOP. Your approach was already attempted in the 2008 election and rejected by a large enough number of conservative voters to doom the campaign of McCain and many other Republicans dependent upon the contributions of conservative and independent voters. Replaying the same error with more energy and renewed hope can only further divide conservatives further and diminish support for Republican candidates even further than before, despite the conservative reactions to the Obama Administration. You simply cannot persuade many conservatives and many independents to trade one unprincipled politician for another.
You can either be a Patriot who protects and defends the Constitution and its social contract limiting the encroachment of government upon the rights and liberties reserved to the states and individual citizens, even when doing so is unpopular and harmful to your personal circumstances, or you can find an infinite number of excuses why not doing so is not expedient today, perhaps tomorrow, or perhaps forever.
Saul Alinsky called upon the Marxist revolutionaries to challenge the ability of the democracy to live up to its own professed standards until they are found to be wanting. The proposed strategy of marginalizing the Constitutional eligibility issue and any person defending the Constitution plays directly into the hands of Saul Alinsky and his Marxist disciples. If you cannot live up to the standards of the Constitution, many people will ask why they should be bothered to do so at the risk of their own personal ruin just o put you into positions of power in their lives? On the other hand, if you demonstrate the Constitution means what it says and you are there to protect and defend it and the citizens it protects, perhaps they will trust you enough to delegate you into power with their votes.
obumpa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.