Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Judge Reverses Prop 9: Discovers New Right
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=2724 ^ | William M Briggs

Posted on 08/06/2010 6:39:21 AM PDT by mattstat

Marriage is not a “contract” between a male and female. That is, it may be partly that—the couple usually pledge allegiance of some kind, such as forswearing all others; again, traditionally—but marriage is not predominately an inter-personal contract.

Instead, marriage is a “contract”, or rather agreement, between the couple and the culture in which the couple lives. It is the culture which confers the special status of “husband and wife.” Marriage, culture says, is different, legally, religiously, and morally, from, say, two (or more) people merely cohabitating.

Another way of stating this is to say that it is everybody but the couple that confers the right of marriage. After all, the couple looks to society and asks each member of that society to recognize the couple’s bond, a bond to which is attached certain privileges and responsibilities.

To emphasize: it is other people, not the couple, that confers the right (and duties) of marriage.

Californians created a law which said, in essence, “We recognize traditional marriage only.” We can now see that ...

(Excerpt) Read more at wmbriggs.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; prop9

1 posted on 08/06/2010 6:39:23 AM PDT by mattstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mattstat

Prop 8.


2 posted on 08/06/2010 6:40:23 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattstat

So I guess Prop 8 is safe.


3 posted on 08/06/2010 6:41:06 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

For a minute there I thought this was a ‘parody’ of Prop 8.


4 posted on 08/06/2010 6:41:34 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mattstat

This kind of ‘anything goes’ thinking (one judge’s opinion negating that of 7 million others), will come around full circle one day to re-instate slavery again.


5 posted on 08/06/2010 6:45:54 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattstat

I thought it was Prop 8

Did you cut and paste the headline ???


6 posted on 08/06/2010 7:00:07 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattstat
To emphasize: it is other people, not the couple, that confers the right (and duties) of marriage.

Unless I am completely misunderstanding his point, Mr. Briggs is mistaken, and his reasoning, not the judge's 'discovery' of a new right, is what will lead to opening the doors to any sort of relationship the human mind can conjure up. The argument that culture confers rights is the same as that of those who advocate a 'pure' democracy. If the most people say something is right or wrong, that's the end of it. It is, at its core, a might-makes-right argument and leads inexorably to a repressive and totalitarian state.

That is why we live in a republic which recognizes that there are values above those that derive only from the will of the people. In this republic those values are recognized to be granted by the Creator. Consider the difference between the French Revolution and the American Revolution to see the outcomes of the two different world views. Clearly we are on an arc toward the outlook of the French Revolution. The end will not be pretty.

What Mr. Brigg's argument fails to take into account is that while traditional marriage is a contract between a couple, and between the couple and society at large, there is another party with a substantial interest—God. Only with that reference point can a marriage be said to be anything other than a civil arrangement. And if it is only a civil arrangement then whatever the civil authorities, or the mob, determines is the definition of marriage, that is it.

7 posted on 08/06/2010 7:09:17 AM PDT by newheart (History is an outbreak of madness--Ellul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson