Posted on 08/04/2010 5:55:34 PM PDT by jbjd
The President will visit Texas August 9. Boyd Richie, Chair of the Texas Democratic Party announced July 31 he couldn’t attend a dinner fundraiser at Austin’s Four Seasons due to non-specified commitments. No time for an AF1 touchdown meet-’n-greet.
Reports Richie dissed the POTUS based on unpopularity, miss the point. He became TDP Chair in 2006. Look what Obama put him through since then.
In 2007, Richie swore to election officials Obama was qualified for office to get his name on the primary ballot. (Under Texas law, the candidate on the ballot must be eligible for the job.)
In March 2008, Hillary Clinton won the primary. But Richie, a superdelegate, announced May 29 he’d vote for Obama at the August Convention.
Days later, he had to realize he made a big mistake.
In June, rumors swirling Obama was no natural born citizen, he launched an internet advertising campaign, “Fight the Smears.” Robert Gibbs, Communications Director for his political campaign, posted a mock-up “Certification of Live Birth.” Copy proclaimed this proved Obama was “native” born. A seasoned politico familiar with federal campaign spending laws, Chairman Richie would recognize this was political advertising. A lawyer, Attorney Richie would discern the legal distinction between an admission the candidate is “native” from the Constitutional requirement “natural born.”
Knowing he’d been ‘had,’ Attorney Richie, a member of the bar, nevertheless promised election officials the nominee was qualified for the general election ballot. For a year, he got away with this lie. Until fall 2009, when citizens contacted AG Abbott charging he committed election fraud to get Obama’s name on the ballot and then, violated Open Records law by refusing to produce documents which were the basis for eligibility certification.
Given these circumstances, who could blame Richie for refusing to give Obama the time of day?
(Excerpt) Read more at jbjd.wordpress.com ...
Dave Montgomery, the reporter for the Star-Telegram, hints the President’s unpopularity explains Mr. Richie’s snub. http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/07/31/2375281/texas-democratic-candidates-distance.html#ixzz0vdSzg9CP Someone should contact Mr. Montgomery to report the more likely reason why. dmontgomery@star-telegram.com
I did not know that. So he is like Pelosi who committed that fraud by certifying in writing that he was qualified for the office (in 2 or 3 states). (All 3 branches of government KNOW that he is not qualified for the office.)
Please read the full article on my blog. Texans have a particularly strong case to expose this fraud and trigger the filing of Articles of Impeachment. First, do your homework. The citizen complaints of election fraud are posted in the sidebar. These contain a well-pleaded overwhelming circumstantial case to support these charges.
As for not knowing Boyd Richie provided the only Certification of BO’s Nomination filed with election officials in Texas, well, you can thank the person who stole some information I posted on my blog - he claimed to have received the information anonymously - and then, having failed to do his homework, misinterpreted that information and spread lied throughout the internet. Eventually, he came to learn he was mistaken but, he could not correct his initial misinformation without revealing the theft. So, he chose to keep his readers in the dark.
I have been desperately trying to correct his mistakes, ever since. Especially with respect to these state Certifications. Because if citizens continue to believe the only person responsible for these false documents is Nancy Pelosi then, effectively, remedying this fraud is beyond their control. But going after the Chair of the Texas state party for the election fraud viz a viz the ballot, could be a breeze, once enough citizen activists come to know the particulars in that state.
So if he was disqualified in Texas.....that in and of itself doesn’t void anything. McCain won all of the Texas Electoral votes.
Absolutely none of my work is aimed at disqualifying BO; or reversing the results of an election whereby the only people elected were Electors. I am charging that the D’s who Certified BO is Constitutionally eligible for the job committed election fraud. That is, they swore to election officials BO was Constitutionally qualified for office without first ascertaining this was true, just to get these officials to print BO’s name on the ballot in those states that require to get on the ballot the candidate must be qualified for the job. This is not about BO; he knows whether he is qualified. But what about those other people who swore he was? How did they know? I insist, they didn’t.
Geesh, I didn’t even think of that! Thank you. I kept omitting ‘words’ (links) to get down to the 300-word limit. But this is only if the post is an excerpt! Oh, well, live and learn...
I will study the article tomorrow when my thoughts are clearer. From what I have read of the article, the pieces would fit the other data that is know. I have been trying to weigh the accusations from Rev. Manning about his involvement with the Muja in Afghanistan.
What can I do from here in Texas to help?
I do have a good relationship with one of the staff of my congressman (Thornberry). On several occasions I have sent them some of my analysis work.
Hurry! Quick! While there’s still time!
You can post it now and it’ll be right here! On page one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.