Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruinator

We need a Constitutional Convention to hold our
“representatives” accountable -—
and governable the same laws.

Today, they shred the Constitution daily
(eg. Romney in Massachusetts with his impositions
and pres_ _ent Obama daily by Executive fiat).


29 posted on 08/02/2010 12:46:40 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis
Do you think you can lay the Constitution on the table and start cutting and changing and even hope you will have anything identifiable left? You can't control a con con, the liberals would love a chance to shred the very concept of inalienable rights.

Why do you want to give them that chance?

35 posted on 08/02/2010 12:59:30 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis

The coservative point of view will not be the only on represented. People forget that. One issue delegates will hold a CC in gridloack. The party in power holds the gavel, and they in turn would set the agenda. We don’t have the enlightment of the founders and to think so is naïve, let the sheer number of the population compared to this country’s founding would make it nearly impossible to find consensus. Just my opinion.


57 posted on 08/02/2010 2:06:59 PM PDT by Bruinator (God is Great.... Beer is good.... Muzzies are.........?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson