[telebob]

This all seems like a very inefficient approach to the problem. Why succumb to the CW models adopted by backward, less technical societies?

In my view, the proper approach would be to disregard side issues of race, ethnicity, rural or urban and focus on the nuetralization of the string pullers and their nomanklatura who are the architects of the new American gulag.

Why waste the ammo?

[frog in a pot]

Your #25 properly questions the lack of wisdom inherent in adopting the CW model used by backward, less technical societies.

I’ll add it seems unwise to equate physical defense of the Constitution as a civil war.
We certainly do not regard violent, but appropriate law enforcement as civil war.
The Constitution is the high ground, and we own it.

The wrinkle comes when, during the sensible approach you advocate, those both internal and external who hold an anti-American agenda employ 3d world Odinga-like tactics.

Unfortunately, and without addressing here the means they could employ, it seems likely they could obstruct the controlled excision we would like to see.

[bill1952]

>the proper approach would be to disregard side issues of race, ethnicity, rural or urban and focus on the nuetralization of the string pullers and their nomanklatura who are the architects of the new American gulag.

Because “side” issues are exactly what is driving this invasion and the “hope & change” takeover of America.
To disregard it is to put you in your grave.

[wintertime]

In my view, the proper approach would be to disregard side issues of race, ethnicity, rural or urban and focus on the nuetralization of the string pullers and their nomanklatura who are the architects of the new American gulag.

Hm?...The "disappearances" game. Both sides can play that slow-burn game.

[ExpatGator]

Because they will be attacking at the margins of the rural/white/safe zones. You will not have a choice.