[r9etb]

You continually hammer at Breitbart as if exposing racism was a crime.

I continue to hammer Breitbart because he posted something out of context.

That's making excuses by pointing a finger at someone else.

A rational person would come to a different conclusion.

He exposed them. For that he has to be brought down.

You're still making excuses for Breitbart's lack of integrity on this matter. He failed to give the whole story -- it appears that he failed even to consider the possibility that there's more to the story -- and he got caught. And now he's trying to spin his way out of it.

Were a leftist to do that, I'm sure you'd be right up there in front, casting stones. But you're not doing so here.... amazing.

[Maverick68]

"Were a leftist to do that,"
============== Leftists ARE doing that, even as we speak which is why many Freepers have a tough time swallowing the spirited defense of Sherrod, the NAACP and the attack on Breitbart...these evil pieces of zhit don't need any help from our side, ESPECIALLY when the defense is usually coming from some who do so to reinforce their sense of superiority....

[Theo]

Breitbart’s concern wasn’t with Shirley Sherrod. His concern was with audience members who cheered her on when they heard the story of her former racism. While Shirley Sherrod is no longer a racist, some of the people in the audience were.

And THAT is Breitbart’s point: the audience, not Shirley Sherrod. To Breitbart, Shirley Sherrod is irrelevant.

[DJ MacWoW]

I continue to hammer Breitbart because he posted something out of context.

You can listen to the whole racist speech. It's online.

A rational person would come to a different conclusion.

She's a racist. And that can't be denied. She said that Republicans are racist because they oppose Bam's agenda. She has not changed. She still makes decisions based on color. She still says "my people" and "them". A rational person knows racism when they see it.

You're still making excuses for Breitbart's lack of integrity on this matter

Nope. Her full speech is worse than the excerpt.

[paulycy]

“I continue to hammer Breitbart because he posted something out of context. “

Given the easily verifiable fact that the Breitbart excerpt INCLUDED Sherrod’s exculpatory phrase “it’s about poor and those who have” it is clear that your point is invalid.

Do your homework. Don’t repeat untrue Media Matters Marxist talking points as though they were fact.

Also, Sherrod’s phrase “oh, it’s still about black and white” is completely within context AND within the original Breitbart post. This is incontrovertible.

Please do your own homework and don’t hammer conservatives with false accusations. We are supposed to be on the same side here on FR.