Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew Breitbart Owes Shirley Sherrod and Us an Apology
Pajamas Media ^ | July 21, 2010 | Ron Radosh

Posted on 07/22/2010 7:40:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last
To: DJ MacWoW

The tape does NOT show people applauding the early comments. It shows them agreeing with and acknowledging the part where she says that her heart was changed by God, that it’s not about black or white, but poor people needing help against the powerful.

It was about Sherrod from the get-go - “The black racist Obama government appointee.” THEN it changed to the “reaction of the NAACP.” Of course, the reaction of the NAACP is a LOT different if you look at it over the full course of the speech.

You seem to be just regurgitating what someone you trust told you - NOT what you have decided yourself after watching the whole video with an open mind. I hope that I am wrong about that. Could you please point out the time signature where they “applaud and cheer” racism?


101 posted on 07/22/2010 8:52:40 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Because for all they say about the lame stream, some people still don’t get it.

Yeah. They're buying everything they are being sold. Did you see JimRobs thread on this?

Is this country being run by the NAACP or what?

102 posted on 07/22/2010 8:53:34 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think Pajamas Media misses the boat here.

Complex speach understood to convey a lot to various audiences — the original audience took it one way and viewers now, expecting worse, take it another.

Taken as a whole, if I had sat through it, would I have given her a job of general responsibility in an Executive Branch — of course not. Her focus is on a litany of special leftist agenda items — if not racial, then class struggle. She has no relationship to our Constitutional structured goals for the Federal Government.


103 posted on 07/22/2010 8:53:45 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
From the speech:

So I took him to a white lawyer that we had -- that had...attended some of the training that we had provided, 'cause Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for the family farmer. So I figured if I take him to one of them that his own kind would take care of him.

So that's when they made black people servants for life. That's when they put laws in place forbidding them to marry each other. That's when they created the racism that we know of today. They did it to keep us divided. And they -- it started working so well, they said, "Gosh, looks like we've come up on something here that can last generations." And here we are over 400 years later, and it's still working. What we have to do is get that out of our heads. There is no difference between us. The only difference is that the folks with money want to stay in power and whether it's health care or whatever it is, they'll do what they need to do to keep that power, you know. It's always about money, y'all.

You know, I haven't seen such a mean-spirited people as I've seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn't it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush's and we didn't do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President.

104 posted on 07/22/2010 8:57:26 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: riri

***Until then, I will sit here and bite my nails, watch the Rasmussen polls and make some shiny new tea party signs.***

This is why military service is good training for our yoots. Sitting and cleaning ordnance - watching for infiltrators and making shiny new bullets would be better;) LOL!!!


105 posted on 07/22/2010 8:57:54 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
'Breitbart: It's Not About Shirley Sherrod; It's About NAACP attacking Tea Party"

You're quoting Breitbart's spin, after-the-fact spin? The story as posted speaks for itself. It made NO MENTION of the crowd reaction. The story was written exclusively about this "racist" speech.

Listen, if you choose to be intellectual obtuse, that's certainly your prerogative. BUT, you're not entitled to your own facts. This speech that was excerpted by Breitbart is not racists, it's religious. The woman talks at some length about the redemptive power of salvation. And it explicitly implores people to NOT judge people on their race, but on their circumstances.

You're either too lazy to read the whole speech, or to intellectual dishonest to admit Brietbart's wrong. Either way, it's not becoming of someone who claims to be conservative.

106 posted on 07/22/2010 8:58:05 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
Yes yes. Poor Saint Shirley!

Shirley Sherrod was hired by Ag Secy Tom Vilsack shortly after shakedown for $13M

Saint Shirley Sherrod: Shut Down BigGovernment.com for Good of the Country

107 posted on 07/22/2010 8:58:54 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma
File under the stimulus bill, free homes and farms if you qualify -- free money the new USDA charter.

As if the free houses for people who could not pay was such a grand success, then free farms for the same people will blow you away.

The USDA, according the Sherrod has just your ticket, free money no interest loans for minorities that want to own farms. Come to think of it, isn't this why Rhodesia went from the breadbasket of Africa to the Zimbabwe who is now starving? Owning the farm doesn't make you a farmer, and proof positive socialism is a bust..

They had to send me extra help from Washington to try to help because of the Stimulus money, because we have more money, direct loans, for low income and moderate income families and guess what – those loans are 100% loans – you can buy the land – and build a house – 100% loans – no private mortgage insurance – those loans are directly from USDA.

Watch the video and see the racism.

Did you know the USDA was in the free home mortgage and free home business. Hey you could buy one and live in a few years, then just move get a new ID and buy another.

108 posted on 07/22/2010 8:59:18 AM PDT by Tarpon (Obama-Speak ... the fusion of sophistry and Newspeak. It's not a gift, it's just lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“The clip speaks for itself.”

This clip misleads as to the focus of she was trying to share. Overall, given other statements and subsequent remarks, I believe the woman has several issues. However, the point is that anyone watching the clip would naturally focus on HER and what she says in the clip.

Breitbart should have been VERY clear about what he was trying to do with the presentation of the clip...that it wasn’t about HER....but about the reaction of the NAACP audience

However, I want conservative to be above reproach in this type of thing....particularly if they are in the business of communication (journalism).


109 posted on 07/22/2010 8:59:54 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
No comment on Kristinns story? Or JimRobs thread. How about this womans shakedown of the USDA?

Shirley Sherrod was hired by Ag Secy Tom Vilsack shortly after shakedown for $13M

You cry for her. She's laughing.

110 posted on 07/22/2010 9:00:59 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

No, I didn’t see Jim’ss thread. When I got here, I posted a vanity avd haven’t really seen what else is going on except for this thread.
Here is mine.
MENSA Syndrome
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2557059/posts

It ain’t what you might think...


111 posted on 07/22/2010 9:02:10 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Got my dates wrong. Thanks for the correction. Much appreciated.


112 posted on 07/22/2010 9:03:22 AM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Breitbart didn’t demand her resignation, Omaba did, through Vilsak.

True, and the reason Obama demanded it was because he had seen the whole tape. When she later confessed to helping out whitey, that's when Zero decided to throw her under the bus.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

113 posted on 07/22/2010 9:05:14 AM PDT by houeto (Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/Jungle-Bucket-1.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Nice take on the situation. It is scary.


114 posted on 07/22/2010 9:06:27 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: pyx

You’re welcome.


115 posted on 07/22/2010 9:06:43 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Breitbart wasn't in the wrong. The NAACP had the complete tape of her speech--all 43 or more minutes of it. They could have easily refuted the excerpts if they wanted. Instead they condemned her, and Obama and the Department of Agriculture fired her. So who is guilty of jumping to conclusions?

IMO, after reading the entire text of the speech and viewing the video, the woman is a racist and partisan hack. She accuses Republicans of being racist and mean spirited because they oppose Obamacare. And it appears the NAACP edited the full speech because of an unexplained gap--[audio/video interrupted at source, duration unknown]

116 posted on 07/22/2010 9:07:10 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

You may be an Old Deck Hand but you are a fairly new FReeper.

There really is no need to keep hammering your one nail - we get it! Breitbart is not perfect enough for you - so he should be chucked overboard.

Have you accomplished anything close to Andrew Breitbart - or do you just feel superior? Feelings are not currency in this fight!!!


117 posted on 07/22/2010 9:07:45 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Dig deeper than the speech and you will find she is a bigoted jackass.

Either way, every single member of the NAACP is a racist....by the very definition of their association.

118 posted on 07/22/2010 9:08:19 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bullshark!
This video has exposed the racists at the NAACP.
If Sherrod was a pillar of fairness, she would have admonished the audience....
Breitbart is a Patriot!!!


119 posted on 07/22/2010 9:09:09 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kabar

>>Blaming Breitbart and Obama is nonsense. <<

But Obama’s admin is the one that took action. They are the ones that forced her resignation. That is where the rubber meets the road here. That is the BIG FXXXXX deal here. Everything else is bad stuff, but pales in comparison. It is just typical media fluff, bias, etc.


120 posted on 07/22/2010 9:10:28 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson