To the rescue?
Posted on 07/19/2010 5:00:25 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
Hi.
Old info, but still valid: Jay McKinnon, aka, opendna
http://www.timothybirdnow.com/?p=851
Whoever it is that took up Polarik’s massive work on this butter???? (forget the FReepname now) had a thread a couple of months back on which someone spoke about the guys who were in on the photoshopping.
Anyone who doesn’t know 0’s a fraud is out to lunch.
Nobody but Les Kinsolving ever asks any tough pointed questions in that room.
.
In the words of the famous Mel Brooks, "It is good to be the King."
Are you like stink on sh!t, white on rice?
Wadda matter, no Rush threads to attack?
There is NO ONE else that has been in on "IT" since the beginning that will take the job...The consequences of the actions one has to take to do the job is too high for a "normal" obot.
To the rescue?
It's called marketing noob, i.e. Capitalism, until Jim Rob says no, live with it.
“I hope it is a sign of things finally changing in the attitude of the press.”
#####
Unlikely.
The Commies finally began to get traction in the counterculture revolution of the 60’s, largely because of, and in league with, their allies in the Press.
Now with American political power to an historically unprecedented degree, I doubt seriously whether we are going to see any significant change in the Media, and their deeply ingrained Leftist propaganda.
And, the guy that wrote it has already admitted the fraud.
Ergo, Gibbs is in on it.
And, now, Gibbs speaks for the office of the ‘President’
Therefore, the fraud is being perpetrated by and in the office of the President itself. “
CORRECT!
Look at the video again = notice one of the State-run
media walking out in the middle of the question.
Says it all, does it not?
Who was that reporter?
I don’t understand that. Aside from posting the whole thing here, how else is the information supposed to get out?
I don’t care a bit how many people visit my blog. I just want the information out there. It’s a lot more efficient to put it in one place and send people there to read it than it is to say it over and over a million times.
I can understand your point if you’re talking about a little article that can easily to posted here in its entirety, but for a longer post with many links it’s just a waste of time to redo it all here if you’ve already got it done someplace else.
And some of us who are putting stuff on our blogs have taken a lot of time to come up with what we’ve got and have a LOT more we still need to do. We have to be decent stewards of our time.
Why is it any more “dishonest, unethical, and parasitic” to link to a blog (that has information that took time to investigate and write up) than it is to post to what a so-called “reporter” reports?
Hmmmmm - there is a whole section right at the top of the “Forums List” for them to post their threads. It is called “Bloggers & Personal”. FR has supplied that specific forum for their posting, how is that unethical?
They don't post threads.
They post a teaser with a link to a blog where one must go to read the bulk of the content.
That is very different from posting a thread.
“Les Kinsolving”
Good man, Les.
Keep peppering him till they can’t ignore it anymore (and don’t let the fraud be forgotten).
It's called blogpimping, n00b.
Disagreeing with it is called "market forces". Live with it.
And crying to teacher is VERY manly of you, Nancy.
Then don’t go there and get another hobby.
You asked a question, I answered it.
Somebody should ask him more questions,,,
Every day...;0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.