Immaculate Deception: Fraud in reporting Obama's birth

The registered birth copy obtained by Orly Taitz in the search of the divorce record(assuming she obtained this in England?):

http://jdlong.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/possiblebhokenyanbirthcertificate1.jpg

Dated Feb 17, 1964. Why is the date significant?

It fits in with the time line for the Obama Sr./Stanley Ann Dunham divorce proceedings from Jan 20-March 20, 1964. The judge must know who parents are before he awards child support/custody and that is disclosed by a birth certificate.

Just so happens these divorce papers skip page 11 with a missing page in back, which would have been said birth certificate:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18130289/Obama-1964-Divorce-Papers-13-Pages-Missing-Pg-11

Scrubbed from the record. Barry’s minions have been busy.

This registered birth certificate copy has been presented in court under oath. It has real stamps and signatures of real people. In addition we have excellent PROVENANCE of it being filed and requested in a previous court proceeding LONG BEFORE THE ISSUE OF OBAMA’S NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP.

There is no provenance of any document presented by Obama in court or otherwise. No birth certificate; not even his online short form has been filed with evidentiary certificate under oath in any court proceeding. Which is because it’s a forgery.

That’s the great thing about COMMON SENSE and DEDUCTION, you don’t have to be document analysis expert to know what document is a forgery.

No evidence is getting to court because Zero’s top law firms are getting cases dismissed on political question, standing, jurisdiction — nothing on the merits.

And thus far, you need comparative (expensive) counsel to go against such MASSIVE legal muscle, and Barry’s lead counsel under direction of Robert Bauer from Perkins Coie has been on this for quite some time. A part time lawyer and dentist, such as Taitz for example, with limited financial resources, staff, is no match.

WND, etc can say whatever they want, it should be mentioned, in the past few years concerning this issue, tidbits were found and posted here on FreeRepublic, usually months to a week before WND even posted the headlines. (Though they did come ahead with the former senior elections clerk in Hawaii, Tim Adams; I never noticed anything posted here beforehand.)

One such item is Stanley Ann’s friend Susan Blake testimony about how she didn’t know how to change the newborn’s diapers:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107889

Another not so disclosed were the missionaries who witnessed the pregnant white girl named Stanley (would you remember?) being denied boarding on a return flight to the U.S.

Moreover, copies of the obtained birth certificate copy were manipulated and posted all over the web by the merchants of chaos at the dummycrat underground,etc. and it was falsely reported that said document was a forgery using a template on another site..until archived records revealed the website had been just recently created for the diversion.

My experiences are there are active legal brats, minions, etc directed from ultimately the White House to murky up the internet powerhouse of information. They stir up lies, create confusion, a complete psy-ops campaign, and the scrubbing of documents and websites has clearly happened under Zero’s current goon and ex-CIA John Brennan. All this I’m sure, because the staff at the HI DOH got Barry race wrong right? At what point will people wake up to what we’re dealing with? http://www.eagleworldnews.com/2007/01/31/care-director-and-two-us-aid-workers-killed-in-nairobi/ Barry uses numerous names, social security numbers, and lies about all of it. These are the constructs of a psychopath.

Zero has already mentioned in public he was born in Kenya when he was Senator and years before, there are witnesses who signed affidavits presented in court. And there is most certainly evidence found that is withheld to avoid compromise of sources, etc. As far as Obama Sr.’s mother’s testimony, I’m not sure.

It would seem however that Zero is an undocumented illegal. Sounds amazing, but that’s what it appears from what the former HI elections clerk stated about no record for Barry; no prima facie evidence, an incomplete or late filing. Phil Berg, who brought the first lawsuit, stated Obama never had an American passport before getting the diplomatic one as Senator. More of that Chi-town corruption?

•Fact 1: Barack Obama Sr. (the President’s father) was married to another woman (Kezia Aoko) in Africa at the time of Barack Hussein Obama Jr’s birth to Stanley Ann Dunham Obama (the President’s mother).

True, but it is unclear whether that first marriage had the force of law. It may have been just a tribal ceremony not recognized by the authorities.

•Fact 2: In the United States, being married to two women at the same time is illegal. It is the crime of bigamy.

But only if the first marriage was legally binding, which we do not know to be the case.

On the other hand, if Obama Sr.'s first marrage was in fact legally binding, then little Barry would have been a US citizen at birth even if born in Kenya. In that case his mother's marriage to his father would be invalid, making her a single mother and allowing her to pass on her citizenship to him if he were born abroad.

•Fact 3: In 1961 someone placed a birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper declaring the birth of a son to “Mr. and Mrs.” Barack Obama (Sr).

That "someone" was the Hawaii Department of Health, as the top of the page clearly indicates.

•Fact 4: Stanley Ann Dunham (Barack Jr’s mother) claims to have been married to Barack Obama Sr. at that time. Barack Obama Jr. also claims that his parents were married and later divorced.

That they were divorced is a matter of public record..

•1. Did Barack Obama Sr. inform Stanley Ann Dunham of his concurrent marriage to the woman in Africa? (If not, he committed fraud as well as bigamy.)

The evidence suggests he informed her some time after they were married, which in turn prompted her to leave for Seattle.

•2. Did Stanley Ann Dunham marry Barack Obama Sr. knowing he was already married to another woman? (If so, they were both fraudulent.)

The evidence suggests not.

•3. Did Stanley Ann’s parents know about the first wife and approve of the marriage of their daughter to an already married man? (If so, they were involved in fraud too.)

By all accounts, SAD's parents did not approve of the marriage. That's why they weren't invited to the ceremony and why the young couple found it necessary to elope to Maui.

•4. Were Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann Dunham really married?

Of course. Why would they bother getting divorced if they were never married?

If not, the placement of the birth announcement of “their son” in the Honolulu Advertiser was fraudulent—unless, of course, the “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama (Sr)” was referring to Mr. Obama and his first wife, in which case, Barack Obama Jr. is not really Stanley Ann Dunham’s child.

LOL. Oh wow! This is rich! So now birthers are questionting whether SAD is his mother! Birther stupidity never ceases to amaze me.

•5. Does Barack Hussein Obama Jr know about the circumstances surrounding the fraudulent reporting of his birth?

You have presented no evidence to suggest there was any fraud involved in the reporting of his birth. All you have presented is evidence that Obama Sr. may have defrauded Hawaii and SAD and comitted bigamy.

Unfortunately, the question of whether Bambi's father committed bigamy or not is irrelevant to eligbility.

If so, that may explain his reluctance to come forward with details about it and his propensity to hide the truth whenever anyone questions his background.

I have a simpler explanation. He's already come forward with enough documentation to prove he's eligible for the presidency. He doesn't produce any more because the conspiracy theories inspired by his secrecy amuse him and help him politically.

If they where never really legally married, then, they could not have been divorced, got to be legally married to get a legal divorce.

Obviously. Yet some birthers fail to realize this, claiming that while there is proof of the divorce, there's no proof of a marriage. I have yet to hear a plausible reason why a couple who isn't married would bother going through the hasstle, pain and expense of a divorce.

Perhaps, Stanley found out that Obama SR had other wives in another country and wanted out of the marriage.

The evidence suggests that's what happened. Friends of hers from Seattle are quoted as saying she was very upset about this during the time whe was in Seattle months after little Barry's birth.

“Fact 1: Barack Obama Sr. (the President’s father) was married to another woman (Kezia Aoko)...”

How do you KNOW that’s his father?

How do you KNOW that’s his father?

The same way I know George H.W. Bush is George W. Bush's father.

?how might that be?

The fact he's listed on the birth certificate, the fact that friends of his parents say they were couple around the time he was concieved, the fact that his parents were married at the time of his birth, and the fact that there is no reason to suspect anyone else might be the father.

“Facts” thrown out by the same MSM our fellow Freepers routinely illustrate outright fraudulent statements and activity.

The “fact” about President Whateverhisnameis are such that planted disinformation and lies so envelope his history that it is NOT possible to determine who he himself really is...much less his parentage.

Circumstantial evidence in such a situation outweighs any such “objective”.....and circumstantially speaking, I believe the below is actually a “father-son” photo

< img src=”http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_J9PlRvGGXS8/SwtAxSsc7uI/AAAAAAAACXE/0q_Khp3j-1w/s1600/barack-obama-child-3.jpg";>

“Facts” thrown out by the same MSM our fellow Freepers routinely illustrate outright fraudulent statements and activity.

Suhc as?

The “fact” about President Whateverhisnameis are such that planted disinformation and lies so envelope his history that it is NOT possible to determine who he himself really is...much less his parentage.

I don't see anything that makes his parentage and identity any more in doubt than that of his predecessor. Do you have anything specific that makes you doubt it more than W's?

http://obamacrimes.com/?p=423

Moreover, the Indonesian School Record

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24898751/Barry-Soetoro-Indonesia-School-Record3

shows the name of the child as “Barry Soetoro”;

Citizenship: Indonesia;

and Parent: Lolo Soetoro, M.A.

The Soetoro Divorce shows the parties of the marriage having two (2) children, one under the age of eighteen (18) and one over the age of eighteen (18) (Soetoro/Obama) who was a full time student.

See divorce papers below.

In divorces, you do not name a child as the child of the parents, like in the Soetoro Divorce, unless the child is legally the child of the divorcing parents.

In otherwords, if Lolo Soetoro was only a step-parent with no legal ties to Soetoro/Obama, then Soetoro/Obama would have never been named in the Soetoro Divorce.

You may find some comfort in the following:

I found what I was looking for:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/07/birther-crazy/

imabirthertoo 20. Jul, 2010 at 11:45 am

Bob Ross, (if that is your real name I must applaud your courage)

Why the need to initially respond with an attack on the substance of my comment?

Fear? Sure it is fear. George Washington, in his farewell address, told us to fear usurpation.

Was George wrong to consider such to be guarded against?

I know the fears of millions of Americans could’ve been laid to rest, and I know who has the ability to make that happen. Obama

I don’t dislike Obama. I never have. I think he was the breath of fresh air that this country needed.

Why is it that people think you must dislike him in order to find a need to question him?

Steadfast defense of the unknown is the way many deal with their fear of an outcome they would rather avoid.

I have seen it too many times.

For example, those who developed interstitial lung disease, after many years of smoking, are more likely to blame their exhaustion on getting older.

They don’t want the truth.

Seeking the truth is the only effective way to address a problem.

Many Obama defenders play the race card as if it were the wildward in their defense deck.

As an African-American, I find this disgraceful.

It only serves to delegitimize every valid complaint.

Obama, by failing to nip this thing in the bud, has damaged race relations in this country.

(yes yes yes!!! That’s what I said!)

What makes the cries of racism worse is that they are predominantly being made by white folks who have never been subjected to racism.

I grew up in the south. I’ve seen racism up close and personal.

Questioning Obama is not a matter of race.

Playing the race card to defend him against all questions is the very essence of racism.