Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Praise for Palin
The American Spectator ^ | July 9, 2010 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on 07/10/2010 2:40:20 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

To her great credit, Sarah Palin is absolutely right on target in her insistence on maintaining a strong defense. Yesterday's Washington Post featured a little report about how Palin is "waging a battle inside the "tea party" movement to exempt defense spending from the group's small-government, anti-deficit fervor." Good for her. The GOP Class of 1994 in Congress had too many members who did the same thing Palin warns against: letting their admirable enthusiasm for lower deficits/balanced budgets get in the way of a commitment to putting national defense first. Palin rightly warns against abandoning the central part of the Reagan belief system that insisted that freedom at home is dependent on a strong, unmatched military -- firmly under civilian control, of course, and fully answerable to the need for efficiency and effectiveness, but not subject to arbitrary budget limits.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; bho44; military; navy; obama; palin; palindoctrine; peacethroughstrength; reagan; sarahpalin; teaparty
Notice the shifting towards her vis a vis 2012?
1 posted on 07/10/2010 2:40:22 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good catch.


2 posted on 07/10/2010 2:44:00 AM PDT by agere_contra (Obama did more damage to the Gulf economy in one day than Pemex/Ixtoc did in nine months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


3 posted on 07/10/2010 3:00:00 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s not the defense spending bills, it’s the add ons costing billions that have nothing to do with defense.

We must promote bills that are clean and without pork.


4 posted on 07/10/2010 3:20:25 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As I just now got to watch Palin's appearance on O'Reilly and some of the comments disparaging her comments (at least when she was allowed to speak by Blathering Bill) I must take exception to those fellow freepers.

I personally thought she did well with her no-nonsense and pretty much, self-explanatory plan for securing the border as "Whatever it takes!"

And with regards to what she believes would be the best solution for the millions of illegals, I am "SATISFIED" with her retort that "YOU DON'T REWARD THEM FOR THEIR HAVING BROKEN OUR LAWS," and jobs should "First and foremost, go to American citizen."

That and agreeing with Bill that they should be forced to register would probably create a climate which would lead to self deportation.

SHEESH! What more do the Palin detractors want?

WHICH POL, DEM OR REPUB HAS EVEN SUGGESTED ANYTHING EVEN CLOSELY MORE SPECIFIC THAN THAT? Oh yeah, I forget, the old saw of "Comprehensive Reform," whatever that means other than being a code word for "Amnesty!"

As an aside, while Dana Perino tried valiantly to defend her former Pro-Shamnesty, RINO boss, Bush, in the end, she made a fool of herself when she could not articulate his wishy-washy "must go to the end of the line" proposal.

5 posted on 07/10/2010 3:30:37 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Palin did well. O’Reilly has gone too far for me. Somewhere along the line O’Reilly seemed to make the decision that if the winds were really blowing hard left he would play along to make sure that O’Reilly still survived and got some interviews . . . I’m series. Or O’Reilly really is just fascistic and doesn’t really care about limited government.


6 posted on 07/10/2010 4:26:34 AM PDT by Mere Survival (The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The thing about strong national defense that Sarah seems to understand, and that the other dopes don’t, is that the enemy has landed and seized the capital.


7 posted on 07/10/2010 4:36:56 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Dana Perino continues to defend Jorge Bush and promote Myth Romney. She is definitely NOT a Palin supporter and her comments should be taken with a truckload of salt.


8 posted on 07/10/2010 4:40:34 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Excellent conclusion.

It is unfortunate that others go wandering off into the irrelevant.

9 posted on 07/10/2010 4:47:42 AM PDT by verity (Obama, the bullshit and rhetoric President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; kanawa; Dave W; fanfan; WVNan; rodguy911; Canedawg; TexasCajun; Brices Crossroads; ...

(((((((((Ping)))))))))


10 posted on 07/10/2010 5:22:45 AM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; kanawa; Dave W; fanfan; WVNan; rodguy911; Canedawg; TexasCajun; Brices Crossroads; ...

((((PING)))))


11 posted on 07/10/2010 5:26:16 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Perino is pleasant to look upon but really was pretty much a non-entity in the WH. She is worth bringig to an Estblishment Chadonnay party and looking at while her soothing voice says nothing of not politically.

On the other hand, Palin has been taking on the Leftist Obama or his entire Presidency, in hard and strategic assaults against Big Govt Leftism.


12 posted on 07/10/2010 7:59:57 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (A loud band of PaulBots, Isolationists, Protectionists, 911Inside Jobnuts, 3rdParty Loud Irrelevants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mere Survival
Somewhere along the line O’Reilly seemed to make the decision that if the winds were really blowing hard left he would play along to make sure that O’Reilly still survived and got some interviews . . . I’m series.

I'm parallel, glad to meet you.

13 posted on 07/10/2010 9:19:19 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445
Palin rightly warns against abandoning the central part of the Reagan belief system that insisted that freedom at home is dependent on a strong, unmatched military -- firmly under civilian control, of course, and fully answerable to the need for efficiency and effectiveness, but not subject to arbitrary budget limits.

Good point!

14 posted on 07/10/2010 8:00:23 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Yes it is. Sarah understands the relationship between civilian-military leadership. As you know being Gov. Sarah has experience in this area.


15 posted on 07/10/2010 8:24:27 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve noticed a lot of shifting going on.

The Tea Party is no longer a target of dismissive media disgust. More and more media outlets are actually taking the movement seriously.

Palin, as well, is (it seems) increasingly taken seriously, both as a political force and as an actual, real, honest-to-goodness non-Tina-Fey-stereotype political mover and shaker.

I think the Left is very nervous right now. Some of the more perceptive among them have started thinking that they may have tried to do too much too fast and have “awakened the sleeping giant.”

It’s up to us to prove them correct.

Donate, volunteer, work for good candidates, win this November, and build towards 2012. The future of the Republic is at stake.


16 posted on 07/10/2010 10:07:20 PM PDT by filbert (More filbert at http://www.medary.com--I've gone rogue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson