Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Unemployable,
That's what you are
You're I.Q.,
Is so subpar
Yet, my darling, it's incroyable,
That someone so unemployable
Should think I'm,
Unemployable too
1 posted on 07/08/2010 9:22:47 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: decimon

I see the only solution is to outsource our kids to China.

Let them get a Chinese education. (Probably a lot cheaper than an Ivy League degree)


2 posted on 07/08/2010 9:27:04 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
But I bet we have better Womyn Studies and Black Studies graduates...
3 posted on 07/08/2010 9:29:19 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Just off the top of my head, this is another affirmative action, screw the man bag of crap!!!

Just my 2 cents.

WAKE UP AMERICA




4 posted on 07/08/2010 9:29:27 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
How embarrassing for the U.S., no one to blame except the schools and affirmative action.
5 posted on 07/08/2010 9:30:00 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

wow they require a 140 IQ. That is setting the bar pretty high. Good for them I guess.

I have a high IQ but it’s not all it’s cracked up to be. Often it results in people who can’t feel empathy or compassion as everything is logic driven. It’s hard to communicate with others because they can’t follow. So if they need some number crunchers or programmers high IQs are good. But if they need leaders often times it gets in their way. Not saying all leaders have small IQs either.


6 posted on 07/08/2010 9:30:41 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
"And at least one executive of an Indian firm complained that American graduates were "unemployable". "

Interesting since almost all Indians I've worked with were terrible. Sure they'd put the hours in, but they couldn't problem solve and most lied about their knowledge base. This dude wants to create the image of "bad American workers" for a vested interest... to lure businesses into using firms like his to replace those "unemployable" Americans.
9 posted on 07/08/2010 9:36:09 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
And at least one executive of an Indian firm complained that American graduates were "unemployable".

Indian firms trying to defend their syphoning off of American tech sector jobs.

11 posted on 07/08/2010 9:36:31 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

US demographics have been shifting in favor of lower IQ segments.

Unmarried teenage mothers whom the government subsidizes to have babies (the hallowed “single moms” who are the mascot class of progressives) average one of the lowest IQ levels of the population.

Also, the tens of millions of illegals who have crossed the southern border significantly lower the average IQ of the country. The high school dropout rate for foreign-born hispanics is appallingly high. The argument by progressives that the children and grandchildren of this population will be widely engaged in high value-added economic activity, such as high-tech entrepreneurs or inventors of medical devices, is nonsense as the data show that the American-born generations following the immigrant generation still have ridiculously high dropout rates, not to mention 50% illegitimacy rates.

As the average IQ of the American population falls relative to other competing world economic zones, and as our economy and politics becomes more socialistic and sclerotic, the standard of living of the US will begin falling farther and farther behind.


13 posted on 07/08/2010 9:44:25 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

The natural result of “No Child Left Behind.” When no child is left behind, the educational system has been dumbed down until no child is educated.


15 posted on 07/08/2010 9:48:44 AM PDT by spaced
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Wasn't Einstein 166? Get any higher than that and you have someone who is unstable. Now, here's another teachable moment. While I can cuss and discuss the pros and cons of a superior IQ score, it must be noted that China isn't willing to take our poor, tired, humble masses yearning for work. THEY have standards (debatable as they might be), yet WE will take anybody (legally or illegally) just warm bodies (4 to be exact) to replace the income taxes I currently pay. China has all the cheap, uneducated bodies it can handle (as did we), so they want the best educated, highest intelligence to take on their entry into the industrial age.

We USED to do that. Now, we've lowered our standards to fit just about anyone who can fog a dental mirror. I guess China is willing to put up with those zany quirks that high IQs bring to the table. I would argue that I'd rather see an average IQ with study skills and a willingness to put forth the effort to master any given subject -- that would leave us with the task of finding educators who can manage to give that average IQ enough material (minus the liberal "world view") to see what they can do with it and insist that they meet a high bar to achieve the mastery.

16 posted on 07/08/2010 9:49:07 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
You're I.Q.,

Right. "You're" part of the problem.

17 posted on 07/08/2010 9:50:31 AM PDT by Doohickey ("It Takes A Spillage." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

ROFLMAO!!


22 posted on 07/08/2010 9:58:35 AM PDT by Cheesel (So this how democracy dies...with thunderous applause, March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

“Yet, my darling, it’s incroyable,
That someone so unemployable
Should think I’m,
Unemployable too”

Excellent.


24 posted on 07/08/2010 10:04:07 AM PDT by flaglady47 (To bastardize Samuel Johnson, tyranny is the last refuge of scoundrels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

A very bright friend who worked at Nasa, etc told me America isn’t producing the bright people anymore, they are coming from places like India.

Doesn’t have to be, but Anmerica is immersed in liberal politics which is just a time waster, accomplishes nothing.


26 posted on 07/08/2010 10:09:41 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Follow and observe a few Chinese drivers then get back to me on this vast IQ difference.


28 posted on 07/08/2010 10:11:16 AM PDT by WinMod70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Japanese enrollment is down as U.S. universities are slowly falling out of favor.

As they should. American universities have strayed so far away from their original purpose that, had I not completed my college education decades ago, I might consider an alternative to college today rather than pay for the junk that passes for college curricula today.

Women's studies? Black studies? the History of Pornography? Digital Gaming?

And, we wonder why Johnny can't read and is still as dumb as a bucket of hair after getting his Bachelor's degree!!

33 posted on 07/08/2010 10:30:34 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

One thing we should note is that American companies (in America) are forbidden by law to administer IQ tests to applicants. Some try to get around this via other means, but no US company can directly ascertain a prospective employee’s Stanford-Binet (or other) score.


36 posted on 07/08/2010 10:34:15 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Whoever disagrees with me at any point is a RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Bleum says the move is meant as no affront to the U.S. Its founder and CEO Eric Rongley is actually an American himself. He says that in China his firm gets thousands of applications a week from eager college grads. With about 1,000 employees, his firm hires less than 1 percent of those who apply. He states, "It is much harder to get into Bleum than it is to Harvard."

This article might not mean very much when the details are looked at. That firm gets 1,000s of applications per week in China, and they hire <1% of those who apply. The are getting their average 140 IQ for a huge pool of applicants in China. Probably a much, much smaller number apply in the US, and I bet they aren't gettting 1,000s of US applicants for each hire.

This tells us little or nothing, beyond that China has 1.3 billion people, and many of them are unemployed and underemployed.

And, we hear so much about the China miracle, but when we get more information, we realize the benefits are still only accruing to about 10% - 15% of their population. I don't think Chinese education is vastly superior to the US if you take the entire nation into account.

51 posted on 07/08/2010 11:04:31 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson