Palin's Didier Endorsement Monumental; Discusses Policy On Freedom Watch

TheCypressTimes.com ^ | 06/14/2010 | Ron Devito

[Patriot1259]

Gov. Palin’s Endorsement Monumental to Didier Campaign

Gov. Palin visited Clint Didier Saturday, June 12, 2010 at his home in the Tri-Cities. The US Senatorial candidate expressed his gratitude to Gov. Palin for her endorsement, which he attributed to a 106,000-hit spike over 24 hours on his website. “That’s how powerful this woman is,” he said. Didier said the effect of her support on his campaign was “monumental” and that “you could not ask for better support.”

News anchor, Terry Chick, of KPER spoke about Gov. Palin putting “her considerable political weight” behind Clint Didier. “It is incredible. She is a woman of grit. She’s got fire in her belly to save this country just like the rest of the people stepping forward to run,” he said.

[FrankR]

“That’s how powerful this woman is,” he said."

Those who have the trust, support, and admiration of the people are indeed the ones with the true power. Fortunes come and go, but the truth and trust are forever.

Soros' money and obama's tyranny will be temporary, at best...but America was built on the backs of the people, and the people shall carry her through.

I keep wondering, if the Purple Lipped Peacock cannot handle an oil spill, what makes him think he could "rule" America?

[Parmy]

Speaking as one who lives in Eastern Washington, Rossi is an establishment pubbie. At best a RINO. He is a two-time loser, regardless of the circumstances. He didn't' fight the corruption of the election process the first run against Crissie. And, his second campaign was dismal. That is being kind.

He does nothing but mouth the platitudes of the establishment talking points.

For instance, he mentions 'immigration reform'. Just what does that mean?

How about advocating the enforcement of the existing laws?

[ConservativeMind]

Sarah probably needs to stop endorsing questionable candidates. There are places where endorsing a RINO can have great effect, such as with Scott Brown, whose mere presence and his one extra promised vote against 0bama makes a true threat. However, others are just seemingly on the stupid fringe. This sounds like another of them.

[Parmy]

Well, Scott Brown has not been a true-blue conservative. If you have noticed, he has voted several times with the dems to the detriment of ordinary citizens. Not Good! Better than a kick in the crotch, but not the best.

[Parmy]

Furthermore, most of the candidates she has endorsed have, in fact, won their primaries. It remains to be seen what happens in the general election.

[SoConPubbie]

Sarah probably needs to stop endorsing questionable candidates. There are places where endorsing a RINO can have great effect, such as with Scott Brown, whose mere presence and his one extra promised vote against 0bama makes a true threat. However, others are just seemingly on the stupid fringe. This sounds like another of them.

Yea, her list of endorsements are just chock full of endorsing questionable candidates:

Why don't you pick out the overwhelming number of bad endorsements from this almost complete list of her endorsements for us?

1. Nikki Haley
2. Michelle Bachmann
3. Scott Brown
4. Doug Hoffman
5. Rand Paul
6. Marco Rubio
7. Chris Christie
8. Bob McDonnell
9. Sean Duffy
10, Susana Martinez
11. Tom Emmer – MN Governor
12. Tim Burns - PA 12th Congressional District
13. Lt Colonel Allen West – FL Congressional District 22
14. Major Vaughn Ward - Idaho’s 1st Congressional District
15. Captain Adam Kinzinge - Illinois’ 11th Congressional District 16. Clint Didier – WA U.S. Senate
17. Cecil Bledsoe
18. Joe Miller
19. John Koster - Washington’s 2nd Congressional District
20. Terry Branstad
21. Carly Fiorina
22. John McCain

2 out of 22 is a real horrible average now isn't it?

Furthermore, her purpose is to get the most conservative possible candidate elected who can win, not tilting at windmills with a purity test.

[Parmy]

I don't understand your point. She has the right to endorse anyone she desires.

Furthermore, I regard most of the Pubs that now hold office to be questionable. And, the dems are without a doubt questionable,

Furthermore, just what is the qualifications that make a candidate questionable, or not questionable.

[ConservativeMind]

Your list is wrong. You forgot the money and endorsements she gave to:

3. Lindsay Graham
4. Lisa Murkowski
5. Orrin Hatch

You have a very convenient memory, or lack there of. If you defend these people as “starters for her PAC”, I suggest that she could have picked other more conservative senators to give to than these POS.

[kevkrom]

The donations to Graham and Hatch were essentially repayments of loans they gave her PAC as startup seed money (which they likely gave her as a favor to McCain). If she actually endorses or campaigns for either of them, then you may have a point, but a one-time repayment of a loan isn't an endorsement.

The Murkowski donation was a "peace offering" and a sign that she wasn't going to run against her for the Senate seat. Since then, Murkowski has been bad-mouthing Palin and Palin has endorsed Murkowski's challenger.

[SoConPubbie]

Your list is wrong. You forgot the money and endorsements she gave to:

Sorry, but we were talking endorsements.

Furthermore, the money paid to Lindsay Graham has already been explained "ad nauseum" here on FreeRepublic as a repayment of the money Graham gave to her PAC when it was first created as a matter of necessity because of the Laws involved.

Furthmore, do you think Ronald Reagan, or any other conservative has not given at one time or another to a PAC or a candidate that was less than conservative?

If you do, please provide examples to prove your point?

Your purity test is ridiculous and short-sighted.

There is no one that passes it, no matter how conservative they are, and makes your point moot.

It has no value!

[Mojave]

The donations to Graham and Hatch were essentially repayments of loans they gave her PAC as startup seed money

Source?