[ConservativeMind]

Your list is wrong. You forgot the money and endorsements she gave to:

3. Lindsay Graham
4. Lisa Murkowski
5. Orrin Hatch

You have a very convenient memory, or lack there of. If you defend these people as “starters for her PAC”, I suggest that she could have picked other more conservative senators to give to than these POS.

[kevkrom]

The donations to Graham and Hatch were essentially repayments of loans they gave her PAC as startup seed money (which they likely gave her as a favor to McCain). If she actually endorses or campaigns for either of them, then you may have a point, but a one-time repayment of a loan isn't an endorsement.

The Murkowski donation was a "peace offering" and a sign that she wasn't going to run against her for the Senate seat. Since then, Murkowski has been bad-mouthing Palin and Palin has endorsed Murkowski's challenger.

[SoConPubbie]

Your list is wrong. You forgot the money and endorsements she gave to:

Sorry, but we were talking endorsements.

Furthermore, the money paid to Lindsay Graham has already been explained "ad nauseum" here on FreeRepublic as a repayment of the money Graham gave to her PAC when it was first created as a matter of necessity because of the Laws involved.

Furthmore, do you think Ronald Reagan, or any other conservative has not given at one time or another to a PAC or a candidate that was less than conservative?

If you do, please provide examples to prove your point?

Your purity test is ridiculous and short-sighted.

There is no one that passes it, no matter how conservative they are, and makes your point moot.

It has no value!