Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuking Oil Well Gains Popular Support
Indy Posted ^ | May 31, 2010 | Rudi Stettner

Posted on 05/31/2010 11:05:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Closing the Gulf oil well leak with a nuke sounds like a bad action cartoon. The only problem is that it has been tried successfully before by the Soviets. And it worked Mother Jones reports as follows on the latest buzz from that 24/7 town meeting known as the internet.

Let’s start with the Russians. According to Vladimir Lagovsky of Komsomolskaya Pravda (once a Soviet communist paper), “In the USSR, a few such leaks were plugged with the help of the peaceful atom.” Five leaks, all underground, were plugged thusly, the paper says—starting with a 1966 natural gas fissure in Uzbekistan. That one was snuffed using a 30-megatonkiloton blast six kilometers deep—about one and a half times the size of the Hiroshima bomb. “The idea of the method is simple,” Lagovsky writes. “An underground explosion pushes the rock, compresses it, and actually squeezes the channel well shut.”

The supporters of the nuke strategy are not raving right wing lunatics either. Christopher Brownfield, military proponent of the strategy, supports socialized medicine in the military and opposed John MCCain in 2008. The comment string on the Mother Jones article treated the nuke idea very fairly.

The stakes are very high. A hurricane could multiply the damage of the gushing oil leak exponentially. The damage to the economy and the ecosystem could be devastating.

We are hearing that we have to expect 2 more months of possibly increased oil spill. Can we wait? Is BP protecting its investment instead of the public. A decision needs to be made on using nuclear or non nuclear explosives to close the oil leak. Things are getting worse. A 22 mile long, thick oil plume has been discovered, smothering marine life in its path, according to Yahoo News. Is BP protecting its profits instead of the public? It seems that BP is in charge of closing the leak. That sounds an awful lot like privatization. That makes Obama sound like a right wing Republican. Life sure is strange.

(VIDEO AT LINK)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: bhonukes; energy; obama; oil; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is stupid talk, on top of stupid thinking on top of stupid consideration.

Put me in charge this will be managed in less than two weeks!

Everyone is just putzing around as if they have lost their brains; or is Coyote managing and ACME Incorporated in charge of supplying solutions?


21 posted on 06/01/2010 12:09:39 AM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Flat Toad

>rupture the ocean floor and let ALL the crude out<

Yikes! I wondered if that was possibly happening already.


22 posted on 06/01/2010 12:17:35 AM PDT by Califreak (A man is defined by the nature of his enemies-Preach it Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ntmxx

>Coyote managing and ACME Incorporated in charge of supplying solutions?<

Maybe Zero is a stockholder?


23 posted on 06/01/2010 12:19:09 AM PDT by Califreak (A man is defined by the nature of his enemies-Preach it Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Now whys you have to go do that to Slim Pickens?


24 posted on 06/01/2010 12:20:36 AM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

The hope, I believe, is that the nuke burns off, or vaporizes much of the oil that has already escaped. Makes sense to me.

It is not like nukes have not been used in the ocean or over the ocean. We, Russia, France.. all have tested nukes over or in the ocean. One Russia used was 100 megatons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxD44HO8dNQ&NR=1 done over the Sakhalin islands.

Here is a hydrogen nuke France tests over a pacific atoll http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln9mhlJ-yCo.

So it has been done over water. Of course we tested on Bikini atoll.


25 posted on 06/01/2010 12:48:43 AM PDT by JSteff ((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

It doesn’t make sense to me because it would be detonated far underground in order to crush the channel of the well. They wouldn’t want any of it to explode in contact with the water where the escaped gas and oil is.


26 posted on 06/01/2010 12:53:12 AM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

-you may be right.
There is speculation that this leak is actually a fissure on the ocean floor:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDGAoU1H2gM&feature=player_embedded


27 posted on 06/01/2010 1:27:08 AM PDT by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

THAT IS FREAKING HILARIOUS!


28 posted on 06/01/2010 4:16:03 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just my 2 cents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sten

Someone else has proposed a similar idea on EVERY oil spill thread in every blog and publication I’ve read (and that is many).

This person keeps mentioning a Tyvek Corral. Anyone here know what that is? I didn’t have much luck from Google.


29 posted on 06/01/2010 4:18:15 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just my 2 cents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

yep, and we are hearing THAT particular oil field would make Saudi jealous, etc.

The way that is gushing, I’d say there is PLENTY.
The msm tries to spin it to say BP was drilling so far out because we are running out of oil and they have to go further out searching for it.

Nobody will give credit to the EPA for forcing them so far from shore.

That said, until companies can get their sh!t together, they have no business deep water drilling. There was obviously either NO emergency plan or NO WAY of executing a plan, or NO equipment available for whatever plan may have existed.

One accident is one too many. We cannot afford it.
This coming from a conservative.

OTOH, the gulf is DONE as far as fishing and tourism, so I guess there is nothing left to do there except “drill baby drill.” Oil jobs will be the only jobs!


30 posted on 06/01/2010 4:23:01 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just my 2 cents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oil is bad.

I kinda think radioactive oil would be worse.


31 posted on 06/01/2010 4:25:16 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntmxx

Just give me a big box of cotton balls, some duct tape, and a REALLY long stick and I will fix that sucker.


32 posted on 06/01/2010 4:26:11 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just my 2 cents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Squantos

You have asked an important question.


33 posted on 06/01/2010 4:32:58 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Exactly. So, from now on there will be no need for engineers and we will leave all engineering to Gallup Research.

That's cuz Obamalamadingdong is calling the shots now and everybody knows that politicians don't take a whiz without first taking a poll.....

34 posted on 06/01/2010 4:37:38 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

An insane proposition I believe Obama would be stupid enough to try.


35 posted on 06/01/2010 5:12:15 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

“Conservatives should be screaming at the top of their lungs that this is an idiot idea. Circulating this by conservatives only makes them look like idiots.”

Got that right. But, unfortunately, some conservatives think that every problem should be “solved” with nukes.


36 posted on 06/01/2010 5:59:33 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bikini is still "Hot" 60 years later. And nobody knows how to cool it down. I'm fairly sure that we can get the oil cleaned up in 60 years. We know how to clean oil. It is hard work and it isn't cheap, but at least we know how to do it.

Since cleaning up the oil is a known quantity. Takes less time. And has known health risks I say just build giant fire booms and clean up the oil. Anybody who wants to use a nuke on the sea floor can do so, right after they finish detoxing Bikini Atoll as a proof of concept.
37 posted on 06/01/2010 6:08:01 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“BP oil disaster: how a deadly methane bubble triggered explosion”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7696596/BP-oil-disaster-how-a-deadly-methane-bubble-triggered-explosion.html

Wonderful. Lets nuke the sea floor and release ALL the methane. Dr. Gregory Ryskin believes a methane explosion triggered the Permian-Triassic Extinction Event that killed off 95 percent of life on this planet. But who gives a damn. Nukes are the only answer. sarc/

“History Channel Mega Disasters - Methane Explosion”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25BE42PzZZc


38 posted on 06/01/2010 6:25:33 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Yes, these Acme Inc. procedures are strickly for Roadrunner cartoons!


39 posted on 06/01/2010 6:48:07 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The former Soviets don’t ell you of the side effects,and the other instances werw underground,not underwater


40 posted on 06/01/2010 7:09:15 AM PDT by screaming eagle2 (No matter what you call it,a pre-owned automobile is STILL A USED CAR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson