Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity- Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Vanity | 30 May 2010 | Joesjane

Posted on 05/30/2010 10:53:41 AM PDT by joesjane

So I am sitting here in Baton Rouge thinking about he oil spill. Of course everyone here is worried. I love what God has created. The oceans, the mountains, nature. Numerous families in my subdivision derive their income from oil in the Gulf. I am far from an environmental kook. I grew up in Oregon and saw what happened to families and industry from the spotted owl fiasco but enough is enough! The gulf is dying and obama is playing golf? Maybe from now on we should say he is playing gulf. Here is my question to my brilliant brothers and sisters on FR. I have heard there are ships capable of drawing in the oil contaminated water, filtering the water, capturing the oil and returning the water to the gulf. WHY hasn't obama brought them in if that ability exists? Second question....why haven't they bombed the well? I am no nuclear scientist but couldn't we detonate a small nuke or conventional weapon to collapse the well? I have had it with the ineptitude. obama's admin gave BP waivers and BP didn't follow up on warning signs that there was a mechanical problem. BP wouldn't be drilling that far out if the enviro weenies hadn't driven them out there. The people of the Gulf region are screwed!


TOPICS: Government; Local News; Science
KEYWORDS: bp; costner; gulfofmexico; obama; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: TigersEye
1. Untested in full operation.
2. The largest of which can do 200,000 gallons a DAY.

That is off by 1,000,000 times.

21 posted on 05/30/2010 3:32:47 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't go chasing waterfalls.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
That is off by 1,000,000 times.

? ? ? ? ? ?

22 posted on 05/30/2010 3:41:23 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: joesjane
I have heard there are ships capable of drawing in the oil contaminated water, filtering the water, capturing the oil and returning the water to the gulf.

On CNN this morning, the former president of Shell said supertankers fitted with huge valves & pumps were used 20 years ago to clean up a big oil spill in the Arabian gulf. They sucked the oil off the surface, then separated the oil from the water and pumped the water back in.

He said the same technique could also be used for the oil plume under the surface just by attaching links of pipe to the pumps.

He thinks BP/Obama won't try it because it's "NIH" (Not Invented Here). That seemed far-fetched until I remembered reading weeks ago that 13 countries offered to help with the cleanup but were turned down...

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/05/06/us_not_accepting_foreign_help_on_oil_spill

23 posted on 05/30/2010 3:53:19 PM PDT by abbyg55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

24 posted on 05/30/2010 3:58:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abbyg55
On CNN this morning, the former president of Shell said supertankers fitted with huge valves & pumps were used 20 years ago to clean up a big oil spill in the Arabian gulf. They sucked the oil off the surface, then separated the oil from the water and pumped the water back in.

He said the same technique could also be used for the oil plume under the surface just by attaching links of pipe to the pumps. He thinks BP/Obama won't try it because it's "NIH" (Not Invented Here). Treat the oil spill like salvage - you suck it up - it's yours.

25 posted on 05/30/2010 4:02:44 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I was trying to say that even if they put all 20 of Costner’s machines in service it is a pitiful effort. Might save one beach but in the open ocean it is a very small contribution. Heck the guys with the hay bales could do more - of course then you have to dispose of those.

BTW how the heck are you?

26 posted on 05/30/2010 4:18:00 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't go chasing waterfalls.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Burning it would of been the best option.


27 posted on 05/30/2010 4:18:37 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't go chasing waterfalls.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

That horse left the barn forty days ago. It wouldn’t touch the majority of oil which is below the surface either. Nice straw-man though.


28 posted on 05/30/2010 4:20:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Ah if BP had not put dispersant in the oil it would be on the surface and ready to burn. Same thing should of been done to the Valdez. Thermite and light it off.

Now it is microbes, evaporation and wait until the balls hit the beach along with some pitiful boomimg and skimming efforts. When the stuff hits Miami the $hit will be in the fan.

29 posted on 05/30/2010 4:23:18 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't go chasing waterfalls.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Treat the oil spill like salvage - you suck it up - it's yours.

What a great idea! Not only could sidelined fishermen do something to help save their livelihood (besides watch BP/Obama flail around), they could replace some of their lost income to boot.

30 posted on 05/30/2010 4:31:53 PM PDT by abbyg55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
All of that is true enough. Didn't the EPA force BP to use dispersants? I know they sent BP a directive trying to make them use more toxic dispersants that simply aren't available.

I really think this whole thing would look a lot less like six monkeys boinking a football if the FedGov would just butt out.

31 posted on 05/30/2010 4:34:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: deport

see post #23, this is what I was hearing about.


32 posted on 05/30/2010 4:59:44 PM PDT by joesjane (The strength of the pack is the wolf - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abbyg55

thanks so much for the info...I think this is what I kept hearing mentioned on talk radio.


33 posted on 05/30/2010 5:00:44 PM PDT by joesjane (The strength of the pack is the wolf - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
I guess I was wrong about Costner having 20 machines. Turns out he has 300.

Gulf oil spill: Kevin Costner donates 'Ocean Therapy' invention to clean oil from sea; BP OK's tests

"Costner has 300 of his Ocean Therapy machines in various sizes. The largest, at 2 1/2 tons, is able to clean water at a rate of 200 gallons a minute - faster than the well is leaking, Houghtaling noted."


34 posted on 05/30/2010 6:49:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joesjane
We were listening to the press conference yesterday with the Admiral of the Coast Guard, and the BP spokesman. The Admiral mentioned something about which I was not aware. Apparently the Mexican government owned company, Pemex, had a huge accident back in the late 70's, and the oil gushing from that one went on for almost 8 months! If that didn't ruin the Gulf of Mexico, I don't think this BP accident will either.

The biggest concern I have is for the shrimpers and fishermen, and their livelihood, because of both the oil and the chemicals used to break it up on the surface, and cause it to fall down into the water.

I'm glad BP has the camera on the pipe, too. It shows they're not trying to hide anything, but it will also be a frustration for people wondering why Obama took so long to get engaged with the situation, and still doesn't seem to be too concerned about it. As for his administration's comments about being involved from "Day One", the only group involved directly was the Coast Guard, and that's because they don't need to be deployed by the President for emergencies like this. They were there very soon after the explosion, plucking survivors out of the water. Their response had NOTHING to do with Obama.

35 posted on 05/30/2010 9:32:18 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Outstanding! Good to see that Kevin put his money where his mouth is concerning the environment. Apparently, he funded his brother's research to develop this machine!

Hope they get it working out there, especially near the fishing and shrimping areas FIRST!

36 posted on 05/30/2010 9:47:17 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson