Skip to comments.
Palin endorsement of Fiorina - you buying it?
The Radio Patriot ^
| May 15, 2010
| Andrea Shea King
Posted on 05/15/2010 10:09:39 AM PDT by patriotgal1787
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: patriotgal1787
Because the lovely Sarah has jumped the shark..
2
posted on
05/15/2010 10:11:08 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(In Obama Land, it is racist to be white..)
To: patriotgal1787
“you buying it?”
Are you?
3
posted on
05/15/2010 10:12:10 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Kagan...Filly-bust-her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
To: patriotgal1787
4
posted on
05/15/2010 10:12:26 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
("Yesterday, I read everything Elena Kagan has ever published. It didn't take long..." -- Paul Campos)
To: rintense
Ping of interest.
Shrewd move? She isn’t exactly liked in California... hmmm...
If this was her plan, this is Ender Wiggin level strategy.
5
posted on
05/15/2010 10:12:37 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: patriotgal1787
It is because Carly Fiorina looks and talks just like the kind of nut-flake job liberal that those stupid Californians would elect. As a so-called Republican she is a train wreck in the mode of Specter, Snowe and that other ditz Senator. As a business woman, she is a train-wreck; just ask former and current HP employees. If she is elected, the designation will be ‘R’ after her name, but her votes will side with Commander Zer0.
6
posted on
05/15/2010 10:12:54 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
To: patriotgal1787
“she sided with Fiorina (who was an economic advisor to McCain during his presidential campaign. That really worked out well, didn’t it?)”
Can you say the Fiorina, McCain, Palin backed...”TARP”????
7
posted on
05/15/2010 10:14:12 AM PDT
by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: patriotgal1787
8
posted on
05/15/2010 10:14:39 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: cardinal4
No, she had a pooch moment as we all do, the big picture for Sarah is still “ballsy conservative.” I am voting for Devore as I believe are most Palin supporters. She must have gotten chummy with Fiorina during the prez campaign and let that influence her.
9
posted on
05/15/2010 10:15:28 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(END THE WAR ON LIBERTY!)
To: patriotgal1787
One of the things that makes me consider someone a leader, at least for me, is that I don't find it difficult to go along with them when their opinion or decision differs from what mine is or was. This is one of those cases. Something deep down inside of me trusts Sarah Palin. And something makes her a leader in my humble opinion.
For me it's a long list of things, each with its own score. I add them all up and if the total is high enough to suit me then I will support that person. Right now Sarah Palin is way ahead of going negative.
This doesn't mean I won't change my mind and my opinion of her. I have a long history of changing horses, sometimes according to my Mom, in the middle of the stream.
Election day 2012 is a long way off, almost two eternities when it comes to politics. I am content to watch it roll along for the next two years or so and make a decision when I have more to go on.
Meanwhile, she's my man!
Sarah Palin must go . . . To the White House!
To: HerrBlucher
iCarly was managing the 2008 campaign, such a swell job. lol.
11
posted on
05/15/2010 10:20:23 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Political Correctness Kills)
To: patriotgal1787
I've still got high hopes for Palin, but her endorsement of Fiorina means nothing to me. I'm voting for DeVore.
Political endorsements in general should be laughed at. Educated voters should study the issues and candidates and make up their own minds - anyone who waits for some politician to give them instructions on who to support is just volunteering to be chum for the sharks.
To: patriotgal1787
I will be voting for DeVore in the primary. And I do not support Palin for President. I like her views, but I do not like the fact that she has quit every elective office she has held rather than sticking it out until the end of the term.
But having said that, I do understand her strategy. She is endorsing an entire slate of candidates that she believes can win. If she endorses say 50 candidates for office and 47 or 48 of them win, it will create the perception that it was her endorsement that made the difference, thus strengthening her chances of gaining the nomination in 2012.
Her interest is not in California. Her interest is not in conservatism. Her interest is in winning. It is true that to be able to make a difference, one must first win the office. But in my humble opinion, one must also show a little principle here and there. Endorsing Fiorina does the opposite.
13
posted on
05/15/2010 10:25:52 AM PDT
by
Guyin4Os
(A messianic ger-tsedek)
To: Gaffer
I think this is pretty close to the nub of it. If CA elects a Republican, it will be a CA Republican, not a conservative republican.
I’m not happy about it.
I will be voting for DeVore in the primary.
But if Carly is what we get in Nov, that’s what we get. I’ll support a piano playing chicken if it means being rid of Boxtard.
Oh hell, the chicken doesn’t even have to play the piano & it will still be a huge improvement. It can be taught to peck at the “no” button.
To: patriotgal1787
I think Palin is bright enough to "tap" the conservative market. She says the right words and people pay her. Many people are truly wanting someone to stand up for America. Palin will speak well but acts at variance to her expressed views. Cynical but probably true.
15
posted on
05/15/2010 10:26:09 AM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: AuntB
Can you say the Fiorina, McCain, Palin backed...TARP????
I've always said that some of her positions on issues worry me more than her endorsements. She also stood fast in her support for the Law of the Sea Treaty when even McCain had the sense to back track on his earlier support for this abomination. I like Sarah and think that she would make a good media figure who rallies the conservative base, but do not see in her the consistent conservative leader she is protrayed as.
16
posted on
05/15/2010 10:28:25 AM PDT
by
rob777
To: jazminerose
I sympathize with you. Of course, you realize that I wasn’t thinking about you or other Freepers as “one of those stupid Californians”....damn, it’s just that you guys are all just simply outnumbered by illegal invaders, idiot liberals and other leeches.....I also agree. A piano playing chicken would be more entertaining and put an end to her ‘legacy’....
17
posted on
05/15/2010 10:28:27 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
To: Gaffer
Understood. We’re on out way out along with the rest of the productive citizenry.
I need to stay long enough to vote against Boxtard one last time for the fun of it.
And because we’ll still own real estate here and be stuck with it for decades to come if CA doesn’t turn it around.
To: jazminerose
Well, good luck to you when you leave....a word of warning. If you cash out, ‘cash’ out.....don’t put your faith in taking a check out of California from a California Bank. Take the cash with you. Cash it out right away and put it in an out-of-state bank, preferably one where you plan to move to...believe me....California Government will be looking for new and innovative ways to find new cash through fees, transfer taxes, processing fees, and just plain holding-of-funds for nebulous reasons. It will be bad......
19
posted on
05/15/2010 10:34:12 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"Palin will speak well but acts at variance to her expressed views. Cynical but probably true."
I am not so sure that it is a matter of calculated cynicism. In my opinion, she is basically a populist with conservatve instincts but not a consistent ideological compass. This means that it is hit or miss when it comes to issues. It also means that personal ties may at times outweigh ideological considerations when it comes to endorsements. She reminds me of former President Bush, a basically decent person who does not have a strong ideological compass.
20
posted on
05/15/2010 10:34:13 AM PDT
by
rob777
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson