Explosive Report Shows Kagan Supports Censorship of TV, Radio, Posters and Pamphlets

Conservative Examiner ^ | 5/11/2010 | Anthony G. Martin

[Welshman007]

According to an explosive special report on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's views on the First Amendment right to free speech, in September of 2009 Kagan encouraged the Court to adhere to a new philosophy on the First Amendment that would allow the government to censor posters, pamphlets, and TV and radio content--and the Internet.

(AP Photo/Steven Senne). Liberal elitist minions at Harvard applaud Kagan's nomination.

In a stunning news report issued today by CNS, the following information was disclosed:

[Safrguns]

And yet the democrats in congress will confirm her.

[Jane Long]

True, and sadly some Repubs may too.

[bgill]

it is clear that the nomination of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court is intended, in part, to bolster the Obama Administration's intention to censor the Internet, radio and TV, posters and pamphlets, and, as an extension, books

Not shocking nor explosive news. Seems on par with the administration and right on target with the destruction of America.

[Freedom56v2]

This report would explain why she would be dear leader’s pic!

[Constitution Day]

BTTT for later

[Oldpuppymax]

And you can BET this won’t be enough to deter Orrin Hatch from supporting her!!!

[GeronL]

Of course she will be confirmed.

Idiots.

[TigersEye]

She’s a shoe in for McCain’s vote.

[Brilliant]

The Axis of Ivy expands its tenacles.

[spokeshave]

Kaganaroo court.

[LearnsFromMistakes]

But these are just her views. I am certain they won’t interfere when her job is simply to ‘interpret the constitution’. If conservatives would just abandon principles and work for social justice a little more often, they would be, ah, liberals...

[Carpe Cerevisi]

I’m sure she’s got Lindsey Grahamnesty’s vote.

[wmap]

I agree with those who say she is not a shoe in. That if the Rep delay this nomination, in order to make it an election issue. Politicians would have to defend their support of her .

[Comparative Advantage]

I pray that Ginsbarf doesn’t retire in the next year. That would mean 3 liberals barely 50 years old. The GOP would have to pull off a political straight to match that down the road.

[opentalk]

bump

[backhoe]

I kepp telling you all what we are really facing here:

 

[RedMonqey]

And yet the democrats in congress will confirm her.

Not all. Bet some think she is too conservative

[RedMonqey]

While she will replace another liberal, there is a HUGE difference in having another liberal and having a RADICAL activist liberal on the court. Too many IMPORTANT cases before the Court boil down to 5-4 decisions. to put a a radical like her on the court would be a disaster.

IF she is willing to eviscerate the First Amendment,( a”sacred” lamb among liberals and conservatives) upon the alter of Political Correctness. imagine what she would do to the Second Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, private property, etc.

Be Afraid. Be very Afraid.....