Posted on 05/07/2010 9:06:07 AM PDT by Patriot1259
I have been following the GOP Senate primary race for some time. I had studied the candidates and after awhile I came to the conclusion that I wanted to support Chuck DeVore in that race. I followed his campaign, saw him give a speech last month, and even gave him some of my paycheck.
My opinion changed today after Sarah Palin gave her endorsement to DeVore’s challenger, Carly Fiorina. It wasn’t Governor Palin’s endorsement that got me to change my mind about him, it was his reaction to the endorsement that served as a big red flag warning to this man’s leadership capabilities. Plain and simple, Chuck DeVore is no statesmen. The statement he allowed to be released by his campaign was immature and derogatory. It said:
“This grassroots movement is actually a grassroots movement,” said DeVore spokesperson Joshua Trevino. “Carly Fiorina thinks she can find the sheepdog to corral the sheep. Chuck DeVore knows they’re not sheep at all. They’re Americans. And they’ll make their own decisions.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thecypresstimes.com ...
So you like Campbell so much that you are embracing a strongly, openly, aggressively, proabortion, and gay marriage, man to be our Senator?
How do you go from Devore, to that? Does his agenda for our nation bother you at all?
___________________________________
Go ahead. Quote me. You've tried in the past. You've actually spent your time goimng back years, years! I guess you don't have much else to do (again, I feel sorry for you).
What did you get? I'll tell you...
In 2008 you found a post where I decsribed Romney as the perfect example of a successful CEO - the exact opposite of Obama.
In 2008 you found a post where I agreed with another freeper that Romney was dealing with a democrat legislature in MA.
In 2008 you found a post where I called out a freeper for telling the lie that Guiliani marched with NAMBLA and hired NAMBLA members to high positions in NYC.
After searching back years that is what you found.
If you have more...show it.
With these three posts, and I stand by the absolute accuracy of all of them, you have lied about me being a liberal, a romney-bot and tried to paint me as pro-homosexual agenda.
It's very easy to lie anonymously as I demonstrated above on this thread (remember? you wet your pants in indignation and ran crying to the mods). I lied to prove that point. Why do you?
I took the time to look at the posts that you say prove WTC911 is a liberal loving freeper. It was also clear that you were trying to tar him with the "pro-queer" brush.
Gotta say, if those posts are all you have then he's right ----- you do play loose with the truth. As my father, the Good Reverend, would say, you show an unfortunate lacking in the character department.
And, dude, it was funny to watch you go ballistic, running to the mods and yelling and all...
Now, where did he get that idea?
What a maroon.
No, I was accurate when I posted this (below). I can continue with it depending on how much energy I want to devote to it, wtc911, is like many of our Romney/Rudy type trolls, they keep their support of candidates close to the vest and concentrate on attacking conservatives, wtc is relentless and nasty in his attacks on Palin from any and all angles, but get him on a Rudy thread or a Romney thread and he becomes suddenly “fair” minded and protective of boundaries of fair play. That is why with wtc, it takes reading entire threads to try and learn his politics, because he attacks viciously, but only plays softly at indirect defenses of the causes he cares about which are liberal.
If you follow the Romney crowd you see that played out in mass, knowing the climate here for Romney, many of them will not mention his name, they learned to direct their attacks at who challenges him, which of course is Palin, in their attacks they are free and unrestrained, but elusive on who they support now.
“You keep things close to the vest, you attack but almost never defend except obliquely, cagey, and troll like, that is the style that you display as you so relentlessly work the Palin threads.
People can look at this thread for example and see how you handle candidates that you like versus a conservative like Palin.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966970/posts#71
LOL, The all important difference is that I am not a liar.
I can post that spammers freepmails that are coming in, and I can also post all the ones from the other times that he has done this.
I also have to assume that the moderators can tell if freemail is being sent and received.
Interesting how your instincts work, first your radical attempt at lying, claiming you were being freepmailed, and now casually assuming that other people would adopt that as a tactic, you really speak volumes about yourself today.
Devore doesn’t have a chance to win the election.
So the choice is between Fiorino and Campbell.
I don’t go by just someone’s platform. I also look at what they’ve done before. (I did this with Obama also, and didn’t like what I saw.)
I don’t like Fiorino. I don’t care that she says she is anti-abortion. She did not do a good job at HP, but she got paid off.
I think Campbell is much more trustworthy than Fiorino, and I put a high value on that.
The bottom line for me vis a vis you is simple...
You claimed that a total of three posts from two years ago (again, do you have a life?) portray another freeper as liberal, queer-friendly, a romneybot and a rudy-ite. Yet the posts you point to do nothing at all to support your statements which are really lies.
Coming up my father, the Good Reverend, advised me to avoid any interaction with people known to lie. I shall heed his advice and bid you farewell.
You forget she and Carly forged a strong bond during the 2008 election and when the media was totally trashing Palin it was Carly who went out there on the LIBERAL shows and defended her — strongly defended her. IF you all don’t understand that it’s your problem, not Palin’s..... Carly is a hell of a lot better than Boxer and she has been endorsed by the pro-life groups, not just Palin.
These are all the same people who said it would be a good thing is Obama won because the GOP needed to be taught a lesson and who said the GOP should lose in 2006 because they needed to be taught a lesson......... and look what that immature thinking has brought this country to!
Campbell over Carly ... then you are an idiot!
You made five posts when you signed up in July of 2009 and then stopped, and then you show up again today with a post at 3:22pm, 3:33pm, and then straight to me on this thread at 3:40pm to join with wtc911, and then your two accounts start playing tag team.
wtc911, this looks like your own sleeper account, is it?
Have you ever met Campbell? Do you have any friends that worked at HP for years?
Do you live in the Silicon Valley?
If Mrs P opts to run you all will enthusiastically support her. All the rest is merely dross.
Do I live in Silicon Valley — nope..... Do I know about Tom Campbell.. yep.. and I also know when Hannity tried to have all three on his program last month Campbell refused to appear with the other two candidates.. he is also pro-abortion and he used to be Arnie’s Director of Finance....California is bankrupt so don’t tell me Carly’s failure at HP trumps Campbell, because it doesn’t; actually I think she is the only candidate that can soundly beat Boxer and I want Boxer gone...
“...to shock on the idea of some FRs supporting Campbell.”
I got an idea...apparently some FR here are RINO and just bash RINO to appear conservative to be part of the in crowd.
Nope. Until recently I have been a very busy guy. For me, and most freepers I imagine, this is a very part time thing, either lurking or posting. Your bold print screaming caught my attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.