Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”
naturalborncitizen ^ | 4/26/2010 | Leo Donofrio

Posted on 04/26/2010 10:21:49 AM PDT by rxsid

"Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”

It looks like Nbc-Gate is hitting top volume. I’ve witnessed some very desperate blogging propaganda trying to stop the bleeding as the nation finally wakes up to the fact that President Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth. Having been born with dual nationality, he was born with a recognized allegiance to a foreign nation. I have explained previously in great detail why this disqualifies him from being President.

The historical dam is breaking as more and more evidence surfaces proving Obama is not eligible. A reader of this blog who has asked to remain anonymous recently provided further historical proof that Obama is not eligible to be president. The New Englander And Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845) states

The expression ‘citizen of the United States occurs in the clauses prescribing qualifications for Representatives, for Senators, and for President. In the latter, the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.
That is serious on point historical research. At the time of his birth, Obama owed allegiance to Great Britain. That is not disputed, it is admitted by the President himself. And this admission is the true problem Obama faces should this issue ever make its way to the Supreme Court. Obama owed allegiance to great Britain when he was born."

Continued:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/educating-the-really-really-confused-about-nbc-gate/

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; citizen; donofrio; dualcitizenship; naturalborncitizen; nbc; nbcgate; obama; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 next last
To: OldDeckHand

“Donofrio has never “reached the SC”.”


A misleading statement (as usual)!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS1oxyfSSQ0


201 posted on 04/27/2010 2:57:20 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

I did not know that.


202 posted on 04/27/2010 3:00:18 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (Just another loony nationalistic egotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: danamco
"A misleading statement (as usual)!!!"

I'm going to give you a pass, because as you have explained, English is not your first language. Donofrio petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. In layman's terms, he asked the Supreme Court to review his case. The Supreme Court denied his petition (frequently called "denied cert") without comment. That is NOT "reaching the Supreme Court". "Reaching the Supreme Court", means that you have been granted cert. To date, neither Donofrio, or ANY birther case has been granted cert.

I also believe, but am not completely positive, that NO birther case has even been given a date for oral arguments at the Circuit Court level. Oral arguments or not, not a single motion to appeal dismissal has prevailed at the Circuit Court. Not once. You could argue that Donofrio has reached the Circuit Court, primarily because the Circuit Court affirmed the lower court's decision. But, the Supreme Court has never even agreed to hear the case.

So much for me "misleading" anyone. You might want to verify your understanding of English as well as legal terminology before you accuse people of misleading statements.

203 posted on 04/27/2010 3:37:01 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

Not to worry.

He couldn’t get a clerarance to clean the crapper in the Pentagon


204 posted on 04/27/2010 4:07:50 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
So much for me "misleading" anyone. You might want to verify your understanding of English as well as legal terminology before you accuse people of misleading statements.

It is definitely in the blood of yours to constantly belittle others, whenever you get a chance to do it, thinking that you are superior to any of your follower Freepers with your posting/projection of a Chuck Gibson & elitist's attitude, looking down on others!

If you think that's working here, you are greatly mistaken!!

You have repeatedly proved to be a real FINO!!!

205 posted on 04/27/2010 4:11:11 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Exactly and that’s why “birthers” are ridiculed by our enemies.


206 posted on 04/27/2010 7:42:58 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Spaulding, while your comments about trolls in general are easy to agree with - we’ve all seen the repartee of which you speak - you have made a serious misjudgment in naming Fred Nerks as “the lead troll” on this thread. Have a look at his posting history. He’s no troll and is well regarded here.


207 posted on 04/27/2010 8:16:58 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54; Spaulding; LucyT

Thanks Natural Born, there’s a first time for everything I guess, I was going to ignore the stupid outburst, but the least you could have done, Spaulding, is include my name in the PING. Rather cowardly of you.


208 posted on 04/27/2010 8:25:44 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding; Fred Nerks

Spaulding, you owe Fred Nerks an apology. She is not a troll, but rather a thorough researcher whose posts are almost always sourced and linked. She’s almost anal about it, upbraiding the rest of us when we are lax.

Surely you’ve read the African Colonial thread by now. If not, do.

Sure, Fred Nerks has opinions, and she often states them. This is, after all, a discussion forum.

Your attack was off-base. We have important battles ahead, and infighting is simply unacceptable. Both of you have contributed significantly and intelligently in trying to unravel who this man in the White House is. A FReeper learns to follow well-informed posters, and both of you are among those I look for.

We must pull together. Please play nice.


209 posted on 04/27/2010 10:03:58 PM PDT by Jedidah (Character, courage, common sense are more important than issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Spaulding

thanks, Jedidah, much appreciated.

Spaulding, here’s the link to OBAMA THE AFRICAN COLONIAL:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2278969/posts

Or, for a brief summary, see comment #97 reproduced on my home page.


210 posted on 04/27/2010 10:14:06 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

You’re most welcome. And I still don’t think it’s a coincidence that Stanley Ann named her daughter Maya.


211 posted on 04/27/2010 10:25:51 PM PDT by Jedidah (Character, courage, common sense are more important than issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

“Maya” means “illusion” in Sanskrit. (Actually it has quite a few other meanings too but that is the primary meaning.)

What do you mean by not a coincidence?


212 posted on 04/27/2010 10:30:55 PM PDT by little jeremiah (http://lifewurx.com - Good herb formulas made by a friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bttt


213 posted on 04/27/2010 11:21:17 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Maya actually did say she was named for Maya Angelou...I didn’t bother keeping the link.


214 posted on 04/27/2010 11:25:00 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Fred Nerks; Spaulding; bgill

In defense of Spaulding — he has a point. If the topic of the thread is not of interest to you, then start your own thread instead of hijacking another thread.

Did I get an answer to my question from any of you yet???

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2500780/posts?page=187#187


215 posted on 04/28/2010 5:37:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

No, and you won’t from me because according to you that is off topic and you can’t have that.


216 posted on 04/28/2010 6:39:44 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I have boy/girl twins, now 18 years old (miracles of modern science). I recall often being asked if they were identical— they look NOTHING alike, and we didn’t dress them alike. Our stock response was that our daughter’s penis was slightly larger than our son’s....


217 posted on 04/28/2010 6:53:40 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bgill; Spaulding
I thought so --

Spaulding was right

218 posted on 04/28/2010 7:33:19 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding; Fred Nerks; rxsid

Oh, good grief. What a speech. Back off Fred. If you want to lambaste someone then it should be me. I asked a question related to the usurper’s NBC, not puppies, or Aunt Suzie’s latest ailment, or who gets their panties in wads. Seems you’re getting a bit off the OP yourself with talk of trolls and Orly. Rx was the OP, not you.


219 posted on 04/28/2010 8:05:24 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

OKay, so Frank “the pervert” Davis and Stanley Dunham, Communists for the CIA, knock up the daughter Stanley (there’s a social experiment, a girl named Stanley) with mulatto twins and as a social experiment leaves one in Africa, the other goes back to white America. Until Stanley Anne, Communist for the CIA and MI6 decides to apply anthropology herself and raises Barry as Indonesian for her own social experiment. But some years later, Barry is safely back growing up in White American Hawaii &/or Cali.

But sometime after Barry is a Muslim for the CIA & Zbig in Pockey-stan, he goes to visit Africa and he his killed by his twin DAVIDbarry?! African-raised DAVIDbarry, a Muslim for the MI6 like his grandpa Obongo Obama before him, assumed Barry’s identity? And it is in fact African DAVIDbarry who breezed Harvard, met up with Ayers in Chicago and the rest is history?! President DAVIDbarry?

DAVIDbarry is probably sad that he never met his daddy Frank Marshall. I wonder if Barry told DAVIDbarry about Pops before DAVIDbarry killed him?


220 posted on 04/28/2010 10:01:23 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson