Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass GOP convention nominates most extreme pro-gay anti-family Gov & Lt. Gov candidates ever
MassResistance ^ | April 21, 2010

Posted on 04/25/2010 11:06:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

Shuns challenger who promised "pro-family" judges. Conservatives sell out in droves.

The Massachusetts Republican Party has nominated the most extreme pro-homosexual, anti-family candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor ever to run as Republicans for a state's top offices. Predictably, the results were greeted by cheers in homosexual blogs and websites across the country.  The delegates to the Massachusetts State Republican Convention last Saturday overwhelmingly nominated Charlie Baker for Governor and his hand-picked running mate Richard Tisei for Lt. Governor.

As some observers put it, the RINO takeover of the Massachusetts Republican party is now complete. Vast numbers of social conservatives essentially sold out their principles in favor of the party establishment's wishes.

Charlie Baker publicly supports homosexual "marriage" and abortion. While CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care the company had a policy of supporting "gender identity or expression." In 2008 Harvard Pilgrim scored a perfect 100% from the national homosexual group Human Rights Campaign for its employment policies. (This means it even paid for employees' "sex-change" procedures!)

Baker's fiscal history is also troubling. He was Gov. Bill Weld's budget chief during the expansion of the "Big Dig" -- the most expensive public works project in history -- in the 1990s. For the last ten years Baker has made millions as head of Harvard Pilgrim, as premiums went up by several times the rate of inflation. Baker also supports the Quinn Bill, seen as a fiscal boondoggle by many conservatives.

Richard Tisei, a state senator and Baker's hand-picked running mate, is probably the most left-wing Republican officeholder in history. He is openly homosexual and is a co-sponsor of the radical "Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes" bill (H1728) currently in the Legislature. He strongly supports same-sex "marriage" and voted NOT to let the people vote on it. He appears in a hideous pro-homosexual "marriage" propaganda video produced by the homosexual lobby (complete with phony statistics). He has a 100% rating by NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and a 100% rating by Planned Parenthood. He co-sponsored the expanded buffer zone bill. He also co-sponsored the "emergency contraception bill" that was vetoed by Gov. Mitt Romney. On the fiscal side, Tisei has voted against bills to reduce taxes earning him the wrath of Citizens for Limited Taxation.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: baker4obamacare; baker4romneycare; brown; brown4obamacare; brown4romneycare; charliebaker; deathcare; deathpanels; education; elections; government; healthcare; homosexual; homosexualagenda; illegalaliencare; ma2010; military; moralabsolutes; nothealthcare; obama; palin; proaborts; romney; romney4obamacare; romneycare; teaparties
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last
To: EternalVigilance

Massachusetts GOP, that’s funny! And everyone is still all giddy over Scott Brown. There is no such thing as a free lunch and there is no such thing as a conservative politician in the state of Taxachusetts! They preferred to be called a commonwealth. What a bunch of panzies!


61 posted on 04/25/2010 12:37:09 PM PDT by klimeckg ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Please send all comments and complaints to Whitey Bulger!


62 posted on 04/25/2010 12:40:50 PM PDT by klimeckg ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

To any and all conservatives still living in the Bay State. MOOOOOOOVE ! Strengthen some wobbly state with your conservative outlook and ideals. Leave the nest of lefties and join us.


63 posted on 04/25/2010 12:43:24 PM PDT by CARTOUCHE (The game continues. Let them come for me and mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

I think I will be voting for Cahill also. Since there is no difference between Baker and Patrick, we may as well lob a few molotov coctails (figuratively speaking).


64 posted on 04/25/2010 12:51:30 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Cahill may be the same as the other two, but don’t you want to kick Baker in the nuggets? That is the point. The only message we can send at this point is to show our anger by punishing those who betray us. You expect this nonsense from the Dems but when “your side” knifes you in the back, it is time to punish them right back.


65 posted on 04/25/2010 12:57:11 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

If a state can be an antichrist I know which one is the leading contendah


66 posted on 04/25/2010 1:01:48 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I am not against a third party but we have to be smart about it. It would be Quixotic to run a third party candidate against Obama but it would not be a bad idea in areas where there are no real viable Republicans such as in Massachusetts today. We have to be selective. Pick districts where there are no Republicans running (which is not uncommon in Mass) and enter an independent. There is also a Constitutional Party in Mass. It would be worth trying to build a conservative movement in Mass. It doesn’t matter if it is called the Republican Party or some other name. What’s in a name?


67 posted on 04/25/2010 1:08:54 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Michele Bachmann has gotten my check, even though I live in Mass. We have to support people like her wherever they are from. People like Michele Bachmann help to create a conservative climate in congress which pulls the RINOS and moderates to the RIGHT. RINOS may have no moral compass but they sure know where the wind blows politically speaking.

The far left has known for years that if they pull hard enough to the left, they will bring the moderates (including moderate Republicans) to the left. That is called strategy. We need a whole lot of strategizing on our side.

68 posted on 04/25/2010 1:20:50 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Gee the GOP once against showing how truly unconservative and Marxist like they are.

But remember vote early and vote often!


69 posted on 04/25/2010 1:27:22 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb
I wouldn't stick with the “Deval” I know, I would rather vote for Cahill, with no illusions, only to scare the devil out of both Mass Repubs and Dems. I think the party apparatchiks are scared stiff of alternatives to their two parties. They are used to dealing with the other party, but they would have no clue about what to do with an independent. That would be a sea change. Even if the candidate is not any hero, it would show them that the people are in a rebellious spirit. This is why they are so scared of the Tea Party movement. They just don't know what to make of it. Think about it, how long have the Dems and Repubs been in power? My grandparents were born in the late eighteen hundreds and both parties were already firm ensconced at the time of their birth. If independents start winning in strategic elections throughout the country it will rattle the cages of the political insiders. Look at what happened in the 23rd district of NY? If independents keep showing up in elections, the political elite will realize that it is not a flash in the pan but a real movement. This could also move the Republicans in a more conservative direction.
70 posted on 04/25/2010 1:37:52 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

I held my nose and voted for McCain because I figured he was a dope and Obama was a mad Marxist. So if you have such a pathetic choice you have to go with the dope. And remember this was the presidency. A president has more power than anyone else. A governor or congressman can’t do nearly as much damage as a president. You have to take that into account.

But when the choices are so bad and you realize that they are thumbing their noses at you because they know that you have no place to go — that is when you use the nuclear option. In these dire circumstances, you switch from voting for the least bad (since there is no choice) and you go into fire-and-brimstone mode. Hell hath no fury as a conservative scorned! This is why I am voting for Cahill, just to put the fear of G-d in them.


71 posted on 04/25/2010 1:55:45 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
So what if Baker wins? Is he any different from Deval? It's like, what would you prefer—arsenic or strychnine?
72 posted on 04/25/2010 2:13:29 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Well, I’m an Independent who has voted third-party from time to time when the two major party candidates were atrocious. But I am thinking of the average MA voter who might have been fed up with Deval’s incompetence and “mini-me” status. If he/she feels there is no real alternative, he/she might stick with the Deval they know or just stay home.

The other very bad thing is that there is NO Republican running for Attorney General. Coakley has a truly horrible record (think Fells Acres), and was severely weakened by her run for Senate (even though people voted against obama, not Coakley). So she could be easily beaten by a reasonably decent candidate.


73 posted on 04/25/2010 4:03:43 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Jacob Kell; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Here's an interesting question: Has the American Independence Party (which is the pissant little third party that EternalVigilance is always shilling for, since he has a financial interest in it) ever actually managed to get somebody elected?

"Yes, we have. One of our original state chairmen ran for the state senate in AL as a Republican in a special election and won."

So a guy left your party and became a Republican, and won an election, how did you get him elected?

Do you have the link to when Paul Sanford was the America's Independent Party's, State Party Chairman?

74 posted on 04/25/2010 4:10:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney-"I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; EternalVigilance; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

As docbj said: “NY allows a candidate to be listed by more than one party. Thus the Conservative Party can nominate the same candidate as the Republicans, or a different one, should the situation dictate.”

In other words, in some states, a candidate can be a member of more than one party. I think that’s what EV meant. That the guy in AL was part of both the AIP and the GOP. OK?:-)


75 posted on 04/25/2010 7:45:44 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (For he is B. Hussein Obama, King of the RDDBs, and may all lesser RDDBs bow before him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

>> I believe in and support a women’s right to choose.

Choose what exactly, to kill?


76 posted on 04/25/2010 7:50:25 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

That’s what the candidate said, yep.


77 posted on 04/25/2010 7:51:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I don't believe in athiests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; EternalVigilance

>> I believe in and support a women’s right to choose.

Quoting Tim Cahill, not EV


78 posted on 04/25/2010 7:52:06 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

TRANSLATION: Mass Gop intentionally abdicate’s election.


79 posted on 04/25/2010 7:53:51 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
Our affiliates can be registered as Republicans if they see fit. We don't care. Our only concern that they stick to America's founding principles.

From our affiliation agreement:

Principle before Party

Personal affiliation with America's Independent Party is made without regard to your existing party voter registration.


80 posted on 04/25/2010 7:56:54 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I don't believe in athiests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson