Posted on 04/25/2010 11:06:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Shuns challenger who promised "pro-family" judges. Conservatives sell out in droves.
The Massachusetts Republican Party has nominated the most extreme pro-homosexual, anti-family candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor ever to run as Republicans for a state's top offices. Predictably, the results were greeted by cheers in homosexual blogs and websites across the country. The delegates to the Massachusetts State Republican Convention last Saturday overwhelmingly nominated Charlie Baker for Governor and his hand-picked running mate Richard Tisei for Lt. Governor.
As some observers put it, the RINO takeover of the Massachusetts Republican party is now complete. Vast numbers of social conservatives essentially sold out their principles in favor of the party establishment's wishes.
Charlie Baker publicly supports homosexual "marriage" and abortion. While CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care the company had a policy of supporting "gender identity or expression." In 2008 Harvard Pilgrim scored a perfect 100% from the national homosexual group Human Rights Campaign for its employment policies. (This means it even paid for employees' "sex-change" procedures!)
Baker's fiscal history is also troubling. He was Gov. Bill Weld's budget chief during the expansion of the "Big Dig" -- the most expensive public works project in history -- in the 1990s. For the last ten years Baker has made millions as head of Harvard Pilgrim, as premiums went up by several times the rate of inflation. Baker also supports the Quinn Bill, seen as a fiscal boondoggle by many conservatives.
Richard Tisei, a state senator and Baker's hand-picked running mate, is probably the most left-wing Republican officeholder in history. He is openly homosexual and is a co-sponsor of the radical "Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes" bill (H1728) currently in the Legislature. He strongly supports same-sex "marriage" and voted NOT to let the people vote on it. He appears in a hideous pro-homosexual "marriage" propaganda video produced by the homosexual lobby (complete with phony statistics). He has a 100% rating by NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and a 100% rating by Planned Parenthood. He co-sponsored the expanded buffer zone bill. He also co-sponsored the "emergency contraception bill" that was vetoed by Gov. Mitt Romney. On the fiscal side, Tisei has voted against bills to reduce taxes earning him the wrath of Citizens for Limited Taxation.
The "right" to "choose" to kill an innocent person. Duh.
The cornerstone of the gay agenda is gay marriage. I oppose that but do support domestic partnerships.
One of the things you'll learn, if you last more than five minutes on this pro-life, pro-traditional-marriage website newbie, is that FReepers aren't stupid.
Unlike yourself, I comprehend that the founders of this republic made it clear that the purpose of government, all government, is to protect the unalienable rights to life and liberty of all persons equally.
A liberal clone is still a liberal clone, whether he has a “D” by his name or an “R”. Choosing one over the other is like choosing which funeral home you want to handle the final arrangements.
This is what you're supporting, Mr. Superior Intelligence.
That was lame, linking to that site to ask them if they can verify your claims is how you expect to fool people?
You are the Party Chairman for the National AIP, you made the claims and you are the source to be asked to verify your own claims.
As AIP National Party Chairman you said that AIP had won an election because the GOP candidate won the state Senate seat, how did your party win that election?
As AIP National Party Chairman you said that GOP candidate Paul Sanford, had been a State Party Chairman for AIP, will you show us what dates that he was?
The Constitution's own stated ultimate purpose is to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity."
Noun
* S: (n) descendants, posterity (all of the offspring of a given progenitor) "we must secure the benefits of freedom for ourselves and our posterity"
* S: (n) posterity (all future generations)
I'm not surprised that you missed that.
I'm also not surprised you missed the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment requirement that "no person shall be deprived of life" without a fair trial.
Again, thanks for bumping the thread, troll.
What difference does it make when the Republicans are nothing but Democrats with Rs by their names?
Experience shows us quite clearly that those who will sell out the babies, and the stated foundational principles of our republic, will sell out anything given the appropriate political pressure. That’s why I don’t believe a word of what you’re saying, newbie.
Hilarious. Like other liberal trolls you're on a thread laying down covering fire for Massachusetts leftist Republicans, the very people who laid the groundwork for ObamaCare.
While people like me have fought them tooth and nail every step of the way.
100% identical, no. But McCain’s compromise-with-the-liberals voting record is close enough. As for Brown,his pro-abortion stance is enough in itself. Mind you, I’m not a one issue person. But such an issue that means the difference between life and death is too important to compromise over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
