Posted on 04/23/2010 9:22:15 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin discusses e-mail hacking trial and the Arizona Immigration law just passed
“This is what you need to know, since you don’t think for yourself:
1) Mark Levin worked for Ronald Reagan.
2) Mark Levin calls Sarah Palin “The Anti-Obama.”
Well, at least you let Levin do YOUR thinking. That is far superior to you left to your own devices ;-)
...and the other comments are actually clearer...
“...if they’re illegal...and don’t follow the rules...they need to get out”
It’s clear her intent in the sum of her opinions is she wants to fight illegal aliens and get them out.
Do you have that transcript in it’s entirety? Since it is different than her other comments it’s possible she made a mistake and misspoke.
Logical fallacies aren’t worthy of a reply. You get one anyway.
“Of course...what does Levin know? Certainly not as much as stephenjohnbankerdude. “
Levin is a good man, and a constitutional scholar. He founded the Landmark Legal Foundation, which has done good work. I disagree with Mark about Palin. I would love to know how he feels about post #114
“” Lars: So you would be in favor, not of a path to create legalization process, but tell them, if you’re not here legally, leave and, in the meantime put up a barrier to keep new illegals out?
Palin: Uh, I would absolutely prefer the latter that you’re suggesting right there””
Lars tried to put the correct words right in Palin’s mouth, and Palin STILL wouldn’t do it.
yeah, but she has other comments that say she is strong against illegal aliens and wants them booted.
When she announces after November, she’ll have her policy out and then you won’t have that issue...unless you’re counting the “she said...she said” argument which is what this boils down to.
You might as well try explaining nuclear fission to a 6 year old child, but nice try FRiend.
“yeah, but she has other comments that say she is strong against illegal aliens and wants them booted.”
WRONG!
really?
“You might as well try explaining nuclear fission to a 6 year old child”
Bring me a six year old, with an IQ above 120, and I’ll take a crack at him ;-)
My objective is not to stop Romney.
My hope is that we nominate the most conservative person that is credible and get get votes on a national scale.
That happens to be Palin.
I think she will run. If by some small chance that she doesn’t I’ll go for the next conservative that is credible and can get votes on a national scale.
Right now, I don’t see any...which is why conservatives attacking Palin is just the wrong tactic.
Is he? Did he?
Well how about that!
Lars: So you would be in favor, not of a path to create legalization process, but tell them, if you’re not here legally, leave and, in the meantime put up a barrier to keep new illegals out?
Palin: Uh, I would absolutely prefer the latter that you’re suggesting right there””
First off: "Uh" is an unnecessary part of her answer, and such reflexes in speech patterns can be left out of any quote without fear of altering the meaning. The only reason to include it is to portray the speaker as someone given to stalling, or nervousness, or stupidity, or some other less-than-flattering trait.
It is instructive that you have chosen to include it.
Now: Of the two scenarios presented, every conservative on earth would prefer the latter to the former.
Logic isn't your strong suit. Neither is conservatism.
If you’re going to post about me, ping me, coward.
“Now: Of the two scenarios presented, every conservative on earth would prefer the latter to the former.”
Thank for proving your inability to understand a simple statement. Palin is clearly for a “path to citizenship; for illegals already here,(amnesty) and she wants to seal the border.
That is not acceptable. Conservatives won’t buy it, and she will lose if she runs.
Pound sand.
These are almost as original and witty as your metaphors.
“
Again...ping me if you’re going to post about me. Chickenshit.
135 posted on Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:19:15 PM by Chunga (
I like your fowl language better than Jessups ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.