Posted on 04/23/2010 12:39:03 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hey I have a great idea, Sullivan—why don’t you accuse your opponent of that which your side perpetrates. That way you can be real smart.
Oh, I see. You’re already doing it. Isn’t it just brilliant. You must be a genius.
Marcuse, Alinsky and Marx. How proud you must be.
I haven’t paid much attention to the guy, but you may be right. Poor bastard if that is the case.
Sarah is starving the lamestream media, and is still able to reach all the real Americans without their "help".
So that writer was utterly insincere the way he bashed her then. Dang.
The economy too — it would require a vibrant economy to sustain a city contaminated by a strategically placed dirty nuke. The panic, loss of land and property, the need for more security measures inside our borders — a vibrant economy could bounce back the way we did after 9-11. But as weak as we are right now, I don’t see us absorbing the shock with any kind of grace.
Another thing to consider is that while other nations can safely build nuclear power plants, we have the added risk of terrorists wanting to destroy the “Great Satan” combined with an illegal labor pool.
they use half truths or outright lies to make a point then simply report the talking point and never reference back to the lie they used to start it.
I am sick and tired of the Stalinists using Pravda in this way. I demand truth in reporting
That drops the creds of those particular Palin bashes to rock bottom. And as it stands, your credibility is way up in my book. Thank you.
What a hater. A real tiger for love and peace that one.
Take a break with the claws and teeth for a sec Andrew...you can continue the attempts to consume her earthly vessel at a later date./s
Nah, no carpet for Sullivan, he's into hardwood.
“. If she’s clear that her plan for “path to citizenship” is nothing like amnesty”
No sale, Arthur. A “path to citizenship” IS amnesty.
” Palin never actually provides numbers in her book, but she does write that she “had made the largest veto totals in the state’s history.” Well, context is important. An observer parachuting into a state without knowing all the local factors can think something is utterly inexplicable which in truth is easily defensible. Still, the results of Palin’s efforts seem strongly to belie her claims of fiscal conservatism. The first two general-fund budgets for which she was responsible showed spending hikes of 16.4 percent (from fiscal year 2007 to ‘08) and a mind-boggling 21.8 percent the next year. Total government expenditures (a slightly different measure) grew 38.6 percent in those two years combined. This record is to fiscal discipline as the Grateful Dead was to sobriety.
Similarly, as has been well documented, Palin’s original claims about the “bridge to nowhere” were flat-out false. She campaigned in favor of the funds for the bridge; then even after killing the bridge project once it became infamous, she kept the federal money and used part of it for a “road to nowhere” that leads to where the bridge was meant to begin. “
Hillyer is not “trashing” anyone. I went back and reviewed Palin’s record in Alaska, and was similarly unimpressed.
I know what you mean — that was the way they pushed for “guest worker”. If she runs, she needs a tougher path than that.
She is still under McCain’s thumb. A real shame.
Almost as good as “ I Walk the Line” ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.