Skip to comments.
Fred Malek: Palin’s not doing what she needs to do to run
HOTAIR.COM ^
| 16 APRIL 2010
| ALLAHPUNDIT
Posted on 04/16/2010 5:28:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Whos Fred Malek and why should you care? Think of him as sort of the Beltway-insider equivalent of John Ziegler. Like Ziegs, hes a Sarahcuda defender par excellence, and like Ziegs, he doesnt think shes angling for a serious shot at the presidency. From a WaPo profile last year describing him as the authority on Palin:
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: fredmalek; malek; malek4romney; malekantipalin; operationleper; palin; palin2012; palinistasattack; romney; romneyantipalin; romneythrewelection; saboteurromney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 621 next last
To: EveningStar
More love-filled commentary from the Palindrones.
The flack is heaviest nearest the target.
241
posted on
04/17/2010 11:20:16 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Mojave
And Romney.
Very true.
242
posted on
04/17/2010 11:21:41 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: rabscuttle385
It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her "loyalty" to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for.
Their other option is to flame you for whoever you supported in the past in order to ignore Plain's contradictory principles.
243
posted on
04/17/2010 11:23:55 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
That's a new label to minimize her amnesty position You mean her amnesty position whereby she is against amnesty (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly on every single Palin thread (with links) you have polluted with your presence), right?
“Now you want you turn the clock back 30 years to avoid discussing Palin? “
You have been continually hammered on Palin threads since you started showing spewing your nonsense. Why would anyone be bothered taking you on, given that you are empty barrel that is full of noise but nothing else?
“Why not revert back to the Lincoln-Douglas debates?”
Because the Reagan/Bush example was directly applicable to what you were saying in that post. I notice that you never bothered to answer the question I asked, but instead, have resorted to empty rhetoric which totally avoids the issue, as usual.
“Every time I think I've seen the depth of desperation of Palin supporters you prove me wrong”
Every time you open your mouth, you stink up the joint. People have to hold their noses just to to avoid the acrid stench that emanates from your direction.
To: Man50D
You are of course a self proclaimed third party supporter. Which third party candidate did you vote for in the last election? Don't you Sarahbots ever get tired of this lame tactic to distract people's attention away from Palin? I haven't endorsed anybody, so you're "Sarahbots" comment is stupid.
You know I tried to have a normal conversation with you and all I get is your waste-of-time, stupidity.
To: rabscuttle385
It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her “loyalty” to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for. I take it you don't remember the nasty 1980 primaries fight between Reagan and Bush then?
Or how Bush repeatedly ridiculed Reagan's premise that tax cuts would lead to more money for businesses to invest, higher growth and then higher profits for businesses, which in turn would lead to higher receipts for the federal government? Or how Bush continued to ridicule Reagan's tax/growth ideas as "voodoo economics" throughout the primaries?
Or how Reagan then ended up choosing the very same Bush who had trashed Reagan's tax cuts proposals and belittled Reagan as an intellectual lightweight, as his own VP candidate?
Or how Bush then proceeded to be a loyal VP for Reagan for the next 8 years?
To: Man50D; EveningStar
Buzz off you communists!!
247
posted on
04/17/2010 12:26:07 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: Man50D; EveningStar
248
posted on
04/17/2010 12:28:25 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: Man50D; EveningStar
Thou shalt not question Saint Sarah, you Romney lovers!
249
posted on
04/17/2010 12:31:51 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: SmokingJoe
You mean her amnesty position whereby she is against amnesty (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly on every single Palin thread (with links) you have polluted with your presence), right?
Wrong. I mean her position supporting amnesty per her interview at the following link.
Palin's Amnesty
You have been continually hammered on Palin threads since you started showing spewing your nonsense.
Not nonsense, just fact.
Because the Reagan/Bush example was directly applicable to what you were saying in that post. I notice that you never bothered to answer the question I asked, but instead, have resorted to empty rhetoric which totally avoids the issue, as usual.
The only thing noticeable is the extent to which you Sarahbots keep trying to shift the focus away from Palin.
Every time you open your mouth, you stink up the joint.
Sometimes the truth stinks.
People have to hold their noses just to to avoid the acrid stench that emanates from your direction.
Hyperbole won't change the fact Palin supports flaming socialist McAmnesty over the conservative candidate because they are of like mind on the amnesty issue.
250
posted on
04/17/2010 12:35:36 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
“Hyperbole won’t change the fact Palin supports flaming socialist McAmnesty over the conservative candidate because they are of like mind on the amnesty issue. “
You voted for Obama!
I know your kind!
251
posted on
04/17/2010 12:41:18 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: FreeReign
I haven't endorsed anybody, so you're "Sarahbots" comment is stupid.
You know I tried to have a normal conversation with you and all I get is your waste-of-time, stupidity.
I never claimed you have endorsed anyone since no one has declared they are running but that doesn't mean you can't agree with her. You use the same misdirection tactics by discussing something other than Palin.
252
posted on
04/17/2010 12:42:56 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Buzz off you communists!!
Da Saul! Very good!!!
253
posted on
04/17/2010 12:43:41 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Buzz off you Paulbots!!
You Sarahbots need to coordinate better. First you pegged me as a Paulbot, then I was for the Huckster and now it's back to Paul! Don't forget Mitt!!
254
posted on
04/17/2010 12:45:38 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: stephenjohnbanker
You voted for Obama!
You caught me! Very good Sherlock! Now go click the report abuse link to zot me before I report back to BO/BS! Hurry!
255
posted on
04/17/2010 12:47:41 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D; EveningStar
S what if Sarah is doing daily radio spots for McCain on Rush & Hannity!
So what if she endorsed McCain!
So what if she thinks Steele is pretty!
So what if she likes Romney!
It’s people like you who cause others to buy plain wrap canned vegetables!
256
posted on
04/17/2010 12:49:51 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
So what if she endorsed McCain!
So what if she thinks Steele is pretty!
So what if she likes Romney!
So what if millions of illegals who knowingly and willingly violate our existing federal immigration laws and are a threat to our national security are allowed to remain in the country? So what if the unconstitutional, socialist health care bill is patterned after the Massachusetts legislation Romney signed into law? Give them amnesty and bring on socialist health care! Go Juan, Sarah and Mitt!!
257
posted on
04/17/2010 12:55:47 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
To: Man50D; EveningStar
“Go Juan, Sarah and Mitt!! “
Now you’re talking!
Just ask Sarah. She has to destroy conservatism in order to save it!
259
posted on
04/17/2010 1:00:13 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: FreeReign
Why not take her at her word?
Because she's a politician, even one I happen to agree with on a lot of issues.
260
posted on
04/17/2010 1:05:22 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(There is no truth to the rumor that Ted Kennedy was buried at sea.....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 621 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson