Fred Malek: Palin’s not doing what she needs to do to run

HOTAIR.COM ^ | 16 APRIL 2010 | ALLAHPUNDIT

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Who’s Fred Malek and why should you care? Think of him as sort of the Beltway-insider equivalent of John Ziegler. Like Ziegs, he’s a Sarahcuda defender par excellence, and like Ziegs, he doesn’t think she’s angling for a serious shot at the presidency. From a WaPo profile last year describing him as “the authority on Palin”:

[Man50D]

More love-filled commentary from the Palindrones.

The flack is heaviest nearest the target.

[Man50D]

And Romney.

Very true.

[Man50D]

It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her "loyalty" to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for.

Their other option is to flame you for whoever you supported in the past in order to ignore Plain's contradictory principles.

[SmokingJoe]

That's a new label to minimize her amnesty position

You mean her amnesty position whereby she is against amnesty (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly on every single Palin thread (with links) you have polluted with your presence), right?

“Now you want you turn the clock back 30 years to avoid discussing Palin? “

You have been continually hammered on Palin threads since you started showing spewing your nonsense. Why would anyone be bothered taking you on, given that you are empty barrel that is full of noise but nothing else?

“Why not revert back to the Lincoln-Douglas debates?”

Because the Reagan/Bush example was directly applicable to what you were saying in that post. I notice that you never bothered to answer the question I asked, but instead, have resorted to empty rhetoric which totally avoids the issue, as usual.

“Every time I think I've seen the depth of desperation of Palin supporters you prove me wrong”

Every time you open your mouth, you stink up the joint. People have to hold their noses just to to avoid the acrid stench that emanates from your direction.

[FreeReign]

You are of course a self proclaimed third party supporter. Which third party candidate did you vote for in the last election? Don't you Sarahbots ever get tired of this lame tactic to distract people's attention away from Palin?

I haven't endorsed anybody, so you're "Sarahbots" comment is stupid.

You know I tried to have a normal conversation with you and all I get is your waste-of-time, stupidity.

[SmokingJoe]

It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her “loyalty” to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for.

I take it you don't remember the nasty 1980 primaries fight between Reagan and Bush then?
Or how Bush repeatedly ridiculed Reagan's premise that tax cuts would lead to more money for businesses to invest, higher growth and then higher profits for businesses, which in turn would lead to higher receipts for the federal government? Or how Bush continued to ridicule Reagan's tax/growth ideas as "voodoo economics" throughout the primaries?
Or how Reagan then ended up choosing the very same Bush who had trashed Reagan's tax cuts proposals and belittled Reagan as an intellectual lightweight, as his own VP candidate?
Or how Bush then proceeded to be a loyal VP for Reagan for the next 8 years?

[stephenjohnbanker]

Buzz off you communists!!

[stephenjohnbanker]

Buzz off you Paulbots!!

[stephenjohnbanker]

Thou shalt not question Saint Sarah, you Romney lovers!

[Man50D]

You mean her amnesty position whereby she is against amnesty (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly on every single Palin thread (with links) you have polluted with your presence), right?

Wrong. I mean her position supporting amnesty per her interview at the following link. Palin's Amnesty

You have been continually hammered on Palin threads since you started showing spewing your nonsense.

Not nonsense, just fact.

Because the Reagan/Bush example was directly applicable to what you were saying in that post. I notice that you never bothered to answer the question I asked, but instead, have resorted to empty rhetoric which totally avoids the issue, as usual.

The only thing noticeable is the extent to which you Sarahbots keep trying to shift the focus away from Palin.

Every time you open your mouth, you stink up the joint.

Sometimes the truth stinks.

People have to hold their noses just to to avoid the acrid stench that emanates from your direction.

Hyperbole won't change the fact Palin supports flaming socialist McAmnesty over the conservative candidate because they are of like mind on the amnesty issue.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Hyperbole won’t change the fact Palin supports flaming socialist McAmnesty over the conservative candidate because they are of like mind on the amnesty issue. “

You voted for Obama!

I know your kind!

[Man50D]

I haven't endorsed anybody, so you're "Sarahbots" comment is stupid.

You know I tried to have a normal conversation with you and all I get is your waste-of-time, stupidity.

I never claimed you have endorsed anyone since no one has declared they are running but that doesn't mean you can't agree with her. You use the same misdirection tactics by discussing something other than Palin.

[Man50D]

Buzz off you communists!!

Da Saul! Very good!!!

[Man50D]

Buzz off you Paulbots!!

You Sarahbots need to coordinate better. First you pegged me as a Paulbot, then I was for the Huckster and now it's back to Paul! Don't forget Mitt!!

[Man50D]

You voted for Obama!

You caught me! Very good Sherlock! Now go click the report abuse link to zot me before I report back to BO/BS! Hurry!

[stephenjohnbanker]

S what if Sarah is doing daily radio spots for McCain on Rush & Hannity!

So what if she endorsed McCain!

So what if she thinks Steele is pretty!

So what if she likes Romney!

It’s people like you who cause others to buy plain wrap canned vegetables!

[Man50D]

So what if she endorsed McCain!

So what if she thinks Steele is pretty!

So what if she likes Romney!

So what if millions of illegals who knowingly and willingly violate our existing federal immigration laws and are a threat to our national security are allowed to remain in the country? So what if the unconstitutional, socialist health care bill is patterned after the Massachusetts legislation Romney signed into law? Give them amnesty and bring on socialist health care! Go Juan, Sarah and Mitt!!

[SmokingJoe]

Wrong. I mean her position supporting amnesty per her interview at the following link. Palin's Amnesty

I mean Sarah Palin being against amnesty, posted right here on FR, like this: Interview with Sarah Palin (Palin *NOT* for Amnesty)

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Go Juan, Sarah and Mitt!! “

Now you’re talking!

Just ask Sarah. She has to destroy conservatism in order to save it!

[MikefromOhio]

Why not take her at her word?

Because she's a politician, even one I happen to agree with on a lot of issues.