Another one bites the dust.
To: Elderberry
To: Elderberry
"After consideration of the motion to consolidate, the opposition, and the applicable law, the motion shall be denied without prejudice as this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear it.""This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her."
Those two statements would seem to be at odds with one another.
3 posted on
04/16/2010 12:10:48 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
To: Elderberry
I wonder if the rat bastards at this kangaroo court decided based on obama’s promises and a newspaper clipping like that stupid @sshole Bill O’reilly.
5 posted on
04/16/2010 12:18:30 PM PDT by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: Elderberry
Long ago when i was in school, we were taught about "checks and balances". In short each branch of government, executive, legislative and judicial held the other branches in check. I see now that learning this was a colossal waste of time, because along the way, this has been discarded.
This is how dictators rise to power.
7 posted on
04/16/2010 12:20:32 PM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(The 0bama regime represents an "Clear and Present Danger" to the US - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: Elderberry
Apparently, no American has standing and no judge has jurisdiction to question the king.
8 posted on
04/16/2010 12:23:56 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
To: BP2; LucyT; hoosiermama; rxsid
i was gonna post something from the ruling, but Lamberth
wrote SOOOO MUCH .....like a pagagraph list of reasons of why the case was dismissed.
10 posted on
04/16/2010 12:31:21 PM PDT by
urtax$@work
(The best kind of memorial is a Burning Memorial.........)
To: Elderberry
No surprise. I said it was coming a few days ago when he “judicially noticed” her.
parsy, who isn’t at all surprised
14 posted on
04/16/2010 12:39:36 PM PDT by
parsifal
(Woe to those who foster stupidity for their own sake, for they shall be drawn and quartered - WEIG)
To: Elderberry
Oh, this is cute! From the decision:
“Ironically enough, Ms. Taitz could never establish such an injury becauseas far as the Court is awareshe was not elected president nor could she be as she is not a natural born citizen herself.”
parsy, who says the Judge is gigging her
16 posted on
04/16/2010 12:47:38 PM PDT by
parsifal
(Woe to those who foster stupidity for their own sake, for they shall be drawn and quartered - WEIG)
To: Elderberry
I’m shocked I tell you shocked...
To: Elderberry
"The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once".
JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI
30 posted on
04/16/2010 1:53:20 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Elderberry
This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her. This is a misstatement of fact by the judge. The suits have not been an "attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen." They have been an attempt to force the man known as Obama to prove that he is constitutionally-qualified to be President.
There is a world of difference between these two things.
The judge's inaccurate construction places a burden on the people to prove something they can't prove sans the court's power to force the production of all relevant documents; documents Obama has consistently covered up, when they are easily producible by him.
The latter puts the burden where it belongs: on the office-seeker/holder to prove that he is actually constitutionally-qualified.
66 posted on
04/16/2010 6:37:51 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(No sane man loves war. But all decent men realize there can be no peace with tyrants or terrorists.)
To: Elderberry
83 posted on
04/17/2010 2:35:23 AM PDT by
Dajjal
(Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
To: Elderberry
88 posted on
04/17/2010 8:51:58 AM PDT by
bitt
("WE THE PEOPLE" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson