Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duncan Hunter for President 2012 - Reasons 18 through 24
Congressional Record ^ | 1990-1994 | Duncan Hunter

Posted on 04/15/2010 8:57:36 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: patriot08

Good info! I wish all the people voting in the primary could see it.


21 posted on 04/15/2010 10:40:01 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Duncan has to get out there and become known. Folks like what they here when I talk about him but have never heard of him or know little.


22 posted on 04/15/2010 10:51:19 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I really like DH. But he has got to get on the radar or it will be pointless. Once again he needs to do a book outlining what he believes and how he intends to govern and do a big book tour.

Whoever he has doing PR needs to be fired because DH is not getting any press. As Diamond David Lee Roth once said quoted “Love Me, or Hate Me, but Don't Ignore Me.” when comes to press releases for a new album. Duncan has got to get in the public eye and start doing a contrast between him and BO and pointing out what Lil’ Barry is doing wrong plus firing up the base to get behind him.

23 posted on 04/15/2010 10:59:19 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

B4DH


24 posted on 04/15/2010 11:14:56 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What took you so long to post the Duncan Hunter for President 2012? I have been waiting fpr ti.


25 posted on 04/15/2010 11:46:44 PM PDT by Fred (Anybody but Stinky Pinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Hunter may be the conservative’s dream for political policy, but he is a charismatic as paint drying on the wall.
26 posted on 04/16/2010 1:00:34 AM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar; pissant
"...but as good and, indeed, as brilliant as Hunter is, he can not be elected in today’s political arena."

That's only because the bipartisan plutocrats who sponsor the mainstream media--including Fox News--won't allow him into televised debates with the other lame candidates. He would take them to the woodshed--every one of them.

Duncan Hunter Press Conference
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju604DgiGf4

There won't be a woman president. The bipartisan campaign for that is hysterical and unrealistic. It's not going to happen before Baby Boomer feminists go to their nursing homes and graves. But if our perverted oligarchs want to try that again, they're welcome to a replay.

No one can force us to buy more. The various sales tax schemes aren't going to work. More job positions of no real importance will be lost every month. Good riddance. We're taking out the trash.

Until a man like Duncan Hunter is elected, don't expect to see a real and ongoing economy in our country. A strong and continuous economy is not possible without such men in business, academic and government leadership. The spoiled, rotten and unrealistic world that we've known is artificially constructed from debt-for-foreign-product (Ponzi) schemes and is in the process of declining. Every day, many more proud, middle class people are beginning to see the harsh reality of the global economy for the first time.

And one way or another, sooner or later, we will have real men in leadership in the USA. All avenues forward in time point toward going socially back to the future. The effete whined about the discontinuation of their pathological social desires during the Depression, and they'll whine about their losses again soon. Immoral weirdness and fiscal crookery require big revenues that won't be available. ...can't get revenues or votes out of a non-political populace.


27 posted on 04/16/2010 1:02:59 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
"Hunter may be the conservative’s dream for political policy, but he is a charismatic as paint drying on the wall."

There have been some interesting charismatic leaders throughout history.


28 posted on 04/16/2010 1:25:19 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

No Conservative can generate enthusiasm from appearances via the socialist media.

We have to stop letting them choose our candidates! The trick is to start getting enthusiastic about him, then our energy will energize others.


29 posted on 04/16/2010 3:21:57 AM PDT by Shimmer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Coming from his big government district in New York, Mr. Schumer probably would have preferred a movie entitled `Pharoah Knows Best.' Charlton Heston did not kill the crime bill. The American people looked at the promise of the gentleman from New York [Mr. Schumer] to make the rest of the country as safe as New York City, and the American people said `that is what we are afraid of.'

ROTFLOL

30 posted on 04/16/2010 4:48:53 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Want real change? Vote out Pelosi, Reid and Franks! They've held office since 1980s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

He had me a decade ago.


31 posted on 04/16/2010 5:11:45 AM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; All

“Now McCain is lying through his teeth about supporting a real border fence. He has opposed Hunter every step of the way.”

GOOD NEWS!!

J.D.Hayworth started his first statewide radio ad here yesterday. The first one on border security is a KILLER !!


32 posted on 04/16/2010 5:27:47 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I met Hunter at a Roger Hedgecock function about 12 years ago. Darrell Issa was there too. Hunter was much more gregarious, and warm in person, compared to when he is giving a speech....almost Reaganesque. Somehow, there must be a way for Hunter to be less rigid as a speaker.


33 posted on 04/16/2010 5:46:51 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

BTTT for DH


34 posted on 04/16/2010 6:29:43 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

In view of your post, I think that only persons who own property should be allowed to vote. That they own property indicates they have the brain necessary to acquire said property, and pay the taxes on it as well, which gives them prime interest in the vote.
That a candidate must appeal to lesser persons in rock star mode in order to be voted for is why we find ourselves where we do today.
How those persons sank to such shallow straits is another story.


35 posted on 04/16/2010 8:49:26 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

BTT


36 posted on 04/16/2010 9:13:20 AM PDT by AuntB (WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
” ... have the brain necessary ... “
Yes I agree 99 44/100 % - which in my book is Correcto Mundo!
Not sure I agree with that part quoted above, I would say “ ... have the necessary stake and/or interest ... “ This was the original intent of the Founding Fathers to limit voting to 'property owners'!
37 posted on 04/16/2010 4:41:50 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson