[Hodar]

The inexcuseable part of all this, is the data they DESTROYED. If you are allowed to destroy actual data, you can form legitimate data to fit any paradigm you like.

Then we have the data was was modified (algorythym used is ‘lost’, and the origional data is discarded - so the raw data cannot be analyzed, questioned or investigated.

So, we have actual data, manufactured data, and a large pile of missing data. This does not include the data that exists, but these points do not support the theory they are proposing, thus that data (while not destroyed) is simply ignored.

Guys, that ain’t science.

[VRWCmember]

Guys, that ain’t science.

No, it's HUMOR, satire, and pretty darn funny too.

[ZirconEncrustedTweezers]

“If you are allowed to destroy actual data, you can form legitimate data to fit any paradigm you like.”

Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.

[cpdiii]

The inexcuseable part of all this, is the data they DESTROYED. If you are allowed to destroy actual data, you can form legitimate data to fit any paradigm you like. Then we have the data was was modified (ALGORythym used is ‘lost’, and the origional data is discarded - so the raw data cannot be analyzed, questioned or investigated. So, we have actual data, manufactured data, and a large pile of missing data. This does not include the data that exists, but these points do not support the theory they are proposing, thus that data (while not destroyed) is simply ignored. Guys, that ain’t science

If I submitted a paper like that during my time at University, my professor would have rejected it and chewed me out and ask me "what the hell are you doing and why are you doing it."

What they did violates just about every premise of legitimate science research.

THEY ARE FRAUDS!!!!!!!!!!!