Posted on 02/18/2010 11:19:58 PM PST by Perchant
Why did Beck say that "birthers" are as dangerous as Timothy McVeigh and that only Democrats and Republican are normal but those who aren't associating themselves with Democrats and Republicans are dangerous? Up until today, he was portraying himself as someone that thought those people were the problem.
Yea you’re right, the Constitution is outdated.
One easy way to do that. Release the long form.
So people who demand that the Constitution be upheld need to “shut up”? There is much less chance of that than there is of BO producing his REAL birth certificate. I suppose you’re uninterested in seeing his college and medical records as well. Oh well, I’m a little more curious about Marxists than the MSM. Bob
Well your mindless, pathetic, waste of time actions based on no evidence may potentially hand the man we loathe a 2nd term.
You birthers are all a bunch of lunatics.
“Beck is right. The Birther crowd needs to shut down and shut up.”
So, like the liberals, you are picking and choosing which part of the Constitution you want to enforce.
Congratulations, you’re an anti-American liberal every bit as much as Clinton, Obama, Pelosi, et al.
“based on no evidence “
There is plenty of evidence, you liberals just like to ignore facts and common sense to uphold your agenda.
Also, the candidate for President is required to prove they are qualfied; we are not required to prove he is not. So, what proof do you have that Obama is qualified? Nothing? Then shut the Hell up.
Why did Beck attribute just as much blame for the economy/national debt to Bush as he does to Obama? Why doesn’t Beck ever mention the FACT that the DemocRats have had control of Congress and spending since the year 2006, for the past three years? Before the DemocRATS took control of Congress, under Bush, we had what economists called a “Goldilocks Economy”...
(http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/934wpftm.asp)...
not too hot and not too cold but just right. Nobody...not Beck, not Rush, no Republican ever wants to mention that fact. Maybe because, like the article states, not even GWB seemed to want to mention the wonderful economy we had under his last year before the DemocRATS took over the purse strings. Had GWB been one tenth as egotistic and arrogant as Zero, he would surely have gone on air and boasted a bit about his success. But noooooooo!
Beck is supposed to be concerned about the direction this country is headed and he mentions a lot of things on his show...and yet he fails to be fair in his assessment concerning Bush. Why does Beck not mention the fact that the DemocRats are more to blame than Bush? Because he doesn’t like either D or R party. He’s more a Libertarian. And as such, I don’t even trust him at this point.
We We We We We We We We We We
The only difference between me and you is that you are a lunatic.
Free Republic is it when it comes to exploring and keeping alive valid issues that everyone else wants buried. Anyone that doesn't like that needs to find another website IMO.
He hasn't.
In fact, he has spent millions in legal fees already just to prevent it from being released.
What does it say? I don't know. It could very well be that he is in fact a US Citizen. Easy enough to put this to rest.
But the question is kind of important don't you think? It is a qualification that was deemed important enough that the Founders included it in the Constitution.
Right now... There's a bunch of smoke. It's no great logical leap that we should probably check to see whats on fire...
Until he no longer associates with Bill O’Bonehead. I will be muting his message.
Pathetic.
#1. Maybe he hasn’t released to keep loons barking about it.
#2. It’s quite possible there’s something else on there, besides his residency, that he doesn’t want people to know. His father? I personally couldn’t care less about this either.
#3. Hillary’s team had people in Kenya looking for evidence, couldn’t find any, Hillary certaintly friends in Hawaii who could of shed light on it with $$$ in their pocket. If there was anything, it would of been uncovered by the Clinton Political Machine.
2. Doesn't negate previous point.
3. Doesn't negate previous point. Plus, Hillary is a Dem. There could be other reasons, like preserving her campaign war chest, that she stopped spending money on it.
The questions still needs to be resolved. It's the Constitution. Unless we want to do away with the rule of law altogether.
I'm not necessarily against that either. Especially seeing as how we have about 4 million too many laws on the books as it is.
“I would prefer that conservatives take over the party from the ground up”
I’m with you . Either the GOP goes full our conservative or we start a new party. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt but not for very long. I say %90 of those in office need to be scrapped and a new breed of non professional politicians and public servants take over.
The point is you have no way out. You’re never going to win this battle, pick the battle you can win, the Presidency in 2012. When you win, get your justice department on it.
Those fighting this are fighting a hopeless battle. Use your brains.
Any other words of wisdom skippy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.